Literature DB >> 317331

Intramural resistivity of cardiac tissue.

A van Oosterom, R W de Boer, R T van Dam.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1979        PMID： 317331     DOI： 10.1007/bf02443820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN： 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Specific electric resistance of body tissues.

Authors:  H C BURGER
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  EPICARDIAL AND INTRAMURAL EXCITATION IN CHRONIC MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.

Authors:  D DURRER; J BUELLER
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Resistivity of body tissues at low frequencies.

Authors:  S RUSH; J A ABILDSKOV
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Specific resistance of body tissues.

Authors:  C F KAY; H P SCHWAN
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Electrical properties of platinum electrodes: impedance measurements and time-domain analysis.

Authors:  R W de Boer; A van Oosterom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Electrical constants of trabecular muscle from mammalian heart.

Authors:  S Weidmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 5.182
  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  Effects of nonocclusive mesenteric hypertension on intestinal function: implications for gastroschisis-related intestinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Shinil K Shah; Kevin R Aroom; Peter A Walker; Hasen Xue; Fernando Jimenez; Brijesh S Gill; Charles S Cox; Stacey D Moore-Olufemi
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Sensor spacing affects the tissue impedance spectra of rabbit ventricular epicardium.

Authors:  Charlotte Mae K Waits; Roger C Barr; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Effect of radial position on volume measurements using the conductance catheter.

Authors:  J C Woodard; C D Bertram; B S Gow
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A critique of impedance measurements in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  R Plonsey; R C Barr
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  A comparison of two models for calculating the electrical potential in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  B J Roth; F L Gielen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Model of electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle based on tissue structure.

Authors:  F L Gielen; H E Cruts; B A Albers; K L Boon; W Wallinga-de Jonge; H B Boom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Dependence of anisotropic myocardial electrical resistivity on cardiac phase and excitation frequency.

Authors:  P Steendijk; E T van der Velde; J Baan
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

8.  Effects of anisotropic myocardial conductivity in model of defibrillation current density distribution.

Authors:  M Malik; K F Smits; F W Lindemans
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle tissue: experimental results from different muscles in vivo.

Authors:  F L Gielen; W Wallinga-de Jonge; K L Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Comparison of electrode impedances of Pt, PtIr (10% Ir) and Ir-AIROF electrodes used in electrophysiological experiments.

Authors:  F L Gielen; P Bergveld
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.602
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.