Literature DB >> 31732947

Superior "green" electrode materials for secondary batteries: through the footprint family indicators to analyze their environmental friendliness.

Haohui Wu1, Yuan Gong2, Yajuan Yu3,4, Kai Huang5,6, Lei Wang1.   

Abstract

As secondary batteries are becoming the popular production of industry, especial for lithium ion batteries (LIBs), the degree of environmental friendliness will gather increasing attention to their products of the whole life cycle. The research combines the life cycle assessment (LCA) and footprint family definition to establish a framework to calculate the footprint family of secondary battery materials. Through the method, we calculated the values of carbon footprint, water footprint, and ecological footprint about this eight kinds of secondary cathode battery materials with Ni-MH, Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2/C, LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2/C, LiNi0.8Co0.2O2/C, LiFePO4/C, LiFe0.98Mn0.02PO4/C, FeF3(H2O)3/C, and NaFePO4/C. When comparing and analyzing their values in each footprint, it can summarize the evaluation method for some secondary batteries by footprint indicators and construct the evaluation system. Through the comprehensive evaluation of footprint family system, the NaFePO4/C battery gets the best performance of three main footprints when combining 1 kg of cathode materials, while Ni-MH is opposite. Hence, among these eight batteries environmental impacts evaluation, the NaFePO4/C battery is regarded as the superior "green" battery, albeit the current application is restricted because of the synthesis limitation on large scale and energy density of storage. In LIBs comparison, the FeF3(H2O)3 material shows its characteristics of environmental friendliness, which is expected to be a greener battery material of LIB. In conventional LIBs, the iron-containing cathode materials show lower environmental burden than ternary cathode materials. We can reduce environmental impacts through developing new advanced materials and reducing the content of high sensitivity element in raw materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Element analysis; Environmental friendliness; Footprint family; LCA; LIBs; Secondary cathode battery materials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31732947     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06865-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  14 in total

1.  Recent Advances and Prospects of Cathode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Xingde Xiang; Kai Zhang; Jun Chen
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Primary and secondary battery consumption trends in Sweden 1996-2013: method development and detailed accounting by battery type.

Authors:  João Patrício; Yuliya Kalmykova; Per E O Berg; Leonardo Rosado; Helena Åberg
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 7.145

3.  Quantifying the environmental impact of a Li-rich high-capacity cathode material in electric vehicles via life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Yajuan Yu; Kai Huang; Bo Chen; Wensheng Deng; Ying Yao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Convergence in CO 2 emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: evidence from OECD countries.

Authors:  Sakiru Adebola Solarin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Research on the influencing factors of reverse logistics carbon footprint under sustainable development.

Authors:  Qiang Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  The role of the water footprint in the context of green marketing.

Authors:  Stella Symeonidou; Dimitra Vagiona
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Environmental friendly leaching reagent for cobalt and lithium recovery from spent lithium-ion batteries.

Authors:  Li Li; Jing Ge; Renjie Chen; Feng Wu; Shi Chen; Xiaoxiao Zhang
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.145

8.  Magnetic structures of NaFePO4 maricite and triphylite polymorphs for sodium-ion batteries.

Authors:  Maxim Avdeev; Zakiah Mohamed; Chris D Ling; Jiechen Lu; Mao Tamaru; Atsuo Yamada; Prabeer Barpanda
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 9.  Prussian Blue Analogs for Rechargeable Batteries.

Authors:  Baoqi Wang; Yu Han; Xiao Wang; Naoufal Bahlawane; Hongge Pan; Mi Yan; Yinzhu Jiang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-04-18

10.  Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.

Authors:  Maria Anna Cusenza; Silvia Bobba; Fulvio Ardente; Maurizio Cellura; Franco Di Persio
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 9.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.