| Literature DB >> 31732375 |
Christopher W Baugh1, Michael Levine2, David Cornutt3, Jason W Wilson4, Richard Kwun5, Charles E Mahan6, Charles V Pollack7, Evie G Marcolini8, Truman J Milling9, W Frank Peacock10, Rachel P Rosovsky11, Fred Wu12, Ravi Sarode13, Alex C Spyropoulos14, Todd C Villines15, Timothy D Woods16, John McManus17, James Williams18.
Abstract
Bleeding is the most common complication of anticoagulant use. The evaluation and management of the bleeding patient is a core competency of emergency medicine. As the prevalence of patients receiving anticoagulant agents and variety of anticoagulants with different mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, and corresponding reversal agents increase, physicians and other clinicians working in the emergency department require a current and nuanced understanding of how best to assess, treat, and reverse anticoagulated patients. In this project, we convened an expert panel to create a consensus decision tree and framework for assessment of the bleeding patient receiving an anticoagulant, as well as use of anticoagulant reversal or coagulation factor replacement, and to address controversies and gaps relevant to this topic. To support decision tree interpretation, the panel also reached agreement on key definitions of life-threatening bleeding, bleeding at a critical site, and emergency surgery or urgent invasive procedure. To reach consensus recommendations, we used a structured literature review and a modified Delphi technique by an expert panel of academic and community physicians with training in emergency medicine, cardiology, hematology, internal medicine/thrombology, pharmacology, toxicology, transfusion medicine and hemostasis, neurology, and surgery, and by other key stakeholder groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31732375 PMCID: PMC7393606 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Emerg Med ISSN: 0196-0644 Impact factor: 5.721