| Literature DB >> 31731793 |
Jia Wang1, Cuili Zhang1, Chunmei Guo1, Xinli Li1.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been identified as one of the inflammatory diseases. Intestinal mucosal barrier function and microflora play major roles in UC. Modified-chitosan products have been consumed as effective and safe drugs to treat UC. The present work aimed to investigate the effect of chitosan (CS) on intestinal microflora and intestinal barrier function in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced UC mice and to explore the underlying mechanisms. KM (Kunming) mice received water/CS (250, 150 mg/kg) for 5 days, and then received 3% DSS for 5 days to induce UC. Subsequently, CS (250, 150 mg/kg) was administered daily for 5 days. Clinical signs, body weight, colon length, and histological changes were recorded. Alterations of intestinal microflora were analyzed by PCR-DGGE, expressions of TNF-α and tight junction proteins were detected by Western blotting. CS showed a significant effect against UC by the increased body weight and colon length, decreased DAI (disease activity index) and histological injury scores, and alleviated histopathological changes. CS reduced the expression of TNF-α, promoted the expressions of tight junction proteins such as claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 to maintain the intestinal mucosal barrier function for attenuating UC in mice. Furthermore, Parabacteroides, Blautia, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella were dominant organisms in the intestinal tract. Blautia and Lactobacillus decreased with DSS treatment, but increased obviously with CS treatment. This is the first time that the effect of original CS against UC in mice has been reported and it is through promoting dominant intestinal microflora such as Blautia, mitigating intestinal microflora dysbiosis, and regulating the expressions of TNF-α, claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1. CS can be developed as an effective food and health care product for the prevention and treatment of UC.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; intestinal microflora; tight junction protein; ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31731793 PMCID: PMC6888260 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Effects of CS on body weight (A) and the disease activity index (DAI) (B) in DSS-induced UC mice. Control: normal mice; DSS: mice treated with 3% DSS alone; CSH: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (250 mg/kg); CSL: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (150 mg/kg). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). ** p < 0.01 versus control; ## p < 0.01 versus DSS-alone.
Figure 2Effects of CS on colon length and histopathology in DSS-induced UC mice. Representative colons (A). Colon length (B). Histopathology (magnification 200×) (C). Histopathological scores (D). Arrows indicated the inflammatory infiltration, mucosal erosion, and damage of crypts. Control: normal mice; DSS: mice treated with 3% DSS alone; CSH: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (250 mg/kg); CSL: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (150 mg/kg). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus control; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 versus DSS-alone.
Figure 3Effects of CS on protein expression of TNF-α, claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1. Control: normal mice; DSS: mice treated with 3% DSS alone; CSH: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (250 mg/kg); CSL: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (150 mg/kg). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10).
Figure 4Representative denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles (A) and unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrograms (B) of intestinal microflora at different time intervals. D11: the 11th day of the experiment. D11-Group 1: mice treated with normal water; D11-Group 2: mice treated with 3% DSS alone; D11-Group 3: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (250 mg/kg); D11-Group 4: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (150 mg/kg). D15: the 15th day of the experiment. D15-Group 1: mice treated with normal water; D15-Group 2: mice treated with normal water; D15-Group 3: mice treated with chitosan (250 mg/kg); D15-Group 4: mice treated with chitosan (150 mg/kg). Bands marked with letters a–g were excised and proceeded for sequencing.
Sequences of bands a–g based on the BLAST database.
| Selected Band | Most Similar Sequence Relative (GenBank Accession Number) | Bacteria Genus | Identity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a |
| 83 | |
| b | 91 | ||
| c |
| 97 | |
| d |
| 92 | |
| e | 91 | ||
| f |
| 87 | |
| g | 89 |
Microflora diversity indexes analysis.
| Group | S | E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D11-Group1 | 20.50 ± 1.29 | 3.0679 ± 0.1258 | 1.0165 ± 0.0439 |
| D11-Group2 | 18.50 ± 0.58 * | 2.7446 ± 0.0469 ** | 0.9410 ± 0.0259 * |
| D11-Group3 | 20.25 ± 0.96 | 2.9627 ± 0.0473 | 0.9852 ± 0.0111 |
| D11-Group4 | 18.75 ± 0.50 * | 2.9097 ± 0.0270 | 0.9929 ± 0.0218 |
| D15-Group1 | 19.75 ± 0.96 | 2.9585 ± 0.0480 | 0.9922 ± 0.0226 |
| D15-Group2 | 20.25 ± 0.50 | 2.8867 ± 0.0244 * | 0.9597 ± 0.0145 * |
| D15-Group3 | 19.25 ± 0.96 | 2.9241 ± 0.0270 | 0.9889 ± 0.0267 |
| D15-Group4 | 20.00 ± 0.82 | 2.9269 ± 0.0409 | 0.9775 ± 0.0279 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus control (D11-Group 1). H’ = −∑ (p) (lnp), p was the proportion of the bands in the track, p = n/∑n, n was the average density of peak i in the densitometric curve. E = H’/ln S, S was the number of bands. D11: the 11th day of the experiment. D11-Group 1: mice treated with normal water; D11-Group 2: mice treated with 3% DSS alone; D11-Group 3: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (250 mg/kg); D11-Group 4: mice treated with DSS plus chitosan (150 mg/kg). D15: the 15th day of the experiment. D15-Group 1: mice treated with normal water; D15-Group 2: mice treated with normal water; D15-Group 3: mice treated with chitosan (250 mg/kg); D15-Group 4: mice treated with chitosan (150 mg/kg).