Literature DB >> 31731474

Emerging Anticancer Potentials of Selenium on Osteosarcoma.

Kok-Lun Pang1, Kok-Yong Chin1.   

Abstract

Selenium is a trace element essential to humans and forms complexes with proteins, which exert physiological functions in the body. In vitro studies suggested that selenium possesses anticancer effects and may be effective against osteosarcoma. This review aims to summarise current evidence on the anticancer activity of inorganic and organic selenium on osteosarcoma. Cellular studies revealed that inorganic and organic selenium shows cytotoxicity, anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on various osteosarcoma cell lines. These actions may be mediated by oxidative stress induced by selenium compounds, leading to the activation of p53, proapoptotic proteins and caspases. Inorganic selenium is selective towards cancer cells, but can cause non-selective cell death at a high dose. This condition challenges the controlled release of selenium from biomaterials. Selenium treatment in animals inoculated with osteosarcoma reduced the tumour size, but did not eliminate the incidence of osteosarcoma. Only one study investigated the relationship between selenium and osteosarcoma in humans, but the results were inconclusive. In summary, although selenium may exert anticancer properties on osteosarcoma in experimental model systems, its effects in humans require further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; cancer; chemoprevention; osteoblasts; oxidative stress; trace elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731474      PMCID: PMC6862058          DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


1. Introduction

Selenium is an essential trace element in humans and is a non-metal from Group 16 of the periodic table that shares some similar physicochemical properties with sulphur. This element is rarely found in its elementary state but rather in its inorganic or organic forms in natural compounds [1,2]. The examples of inorganic selenium are selenium dioxide (SeO2), selenite (SeO32−) and selenate (SeO42−), whereas those for organic selenium are selenide, diselenides, selenol or selenothiol and seleninic acid (selenium-based acid; RSeOH) [2,3,4,5]. Selenium can be obtained mainly from food, such as Brazil nuts, garlic, onion, mushroom, broccoli, meat, egg, seafood and internal organs and in negligible quantity from drinking water [6,7,8]. The main selenium species present in food are selenomethionine (SeMet), selenocysteine (SeC), selenium-methylselenocysteine (Se-MSC), SeO32 and SeO42− [9]. The organic forms of selenium are present in greater amount in food, and their bioavailability is higher because they are absorbed easily compared with inorganic selenium [7,8,10]. The US-recommended dietary allowance and UK-recommended reference nutrient intake of selenium for an adult are 55 and 60 µg/day, respectively [11,12]. The average dietary intake of selenium varies across countries [10,13,14,15,16]. People from several countries, such as the UK, China, New Zealand and Finland, are traditionally deficient in selenium dietary intake [7,8,10,15,16]. Selenium is vital in various physiological processes and can incorporate into a protein as selenoproteins (SeC-containing protein), selenium-binding proteins (without SeC) and certain proteins rich in cysteine or methionine (such as SeMet), where sulphur is replaced by selenium in a nonspecific manner [1,17]. This element is required as a cofactor in more than 25 selenoproteins including glutathione peroxidase, thioredoxin reductase and iodothyronine deiodinase [1,18]. Selenoproteins are essential in oxidative defence, detoxification, immune response and thyroid hormone regulation [8,18,19]. Minor selenoproteins, such as selenoprotein-P, -W and -R, have antioxidant functions [8,20,21]. Selenoprotein-S is involved in inflammatory response and protein quality control [1,8]. Inadequate selenium uptake is related to cardiovascular diseases (Keshan disease), muscular diseases and bone diseases (osteopenia and Kashin-Beck disease) [2,18,22]. Selenium also exhibits potential in vivo and in vitro anticancer activities. Inorganic and organic selenium induce cell cycle arrest, cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction on cancerous cell lines from colon, breast, lung or prostate origins [2,5,23,24,25,26,27]. High levels of inorganic and organic selenium induce oxidative stress in cancer cells by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [5,28]. Selenium also prompts oxidative damage on DNA and mitochondria, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction in caspase-dependent or -independent apoptosis [2]. Organic selenium, such as methyseleninic acid (MSeA) inhibits angiogenesis by downregulating integrin β3 signalling [29]. Inorganic and organic selenium activate calcium influx, endoplasmic reticulum stress, 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), AKT, tumour suppressor protein phosphatase and tensin homolog (pTEN) and p53 signalling upstream of apoptosis events [24,27,30,31,32]. The potency of selenium in cytotoxicity depends greatly on chemical forms, cancer cell types and bioavailability [5]. With the use of human findings, the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer (NPC) trial showed that selenium intake decreases the risk of lung, colorectal and prostate cancer [33,34,35]. The Linxian Nutritional Intervention Trials also reported that a high level of basal serum selenium is associated with a marked reduction in mortality among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer [33,36]. Bone cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers with the lowest long-term survival rate among children and adolescents [37]. Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant primary bone tumour in children and teenagers with 400 new cases annually in the US [38]. Its annual incidence rate is relatively low, with approximately 2–3.4 per million people worldwide [39,40], as compared with the most common childhood malignancy, childhood leukaemia (46.7 per million people) [41]. Osteosarcoma can be classified histopathologically into low-, intermediate- and high-grade, and more than 90% of osteosarcomas are high-grade malignancies [42]. Osteosarcoma is commonly found at the metaphyseal of long bones and its aetiology remains unknown [43]. Patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma have a 65–70% five-year survival rate, whereas those with metastatic osteosarcoma have a poor survival rate of 19–30% [38,42]. The relapse rate for osteosarcoma is high, whereby nearly 40% of patients initially diagnosed with non-metastatic disease develop recurring osteosarcoma [44]. The current treatment options for osteosarcoma include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy [38,40,45]. Adjuvant chemotherapy can greatly improve the quality of life and 5-year survival rate of these patients, but 30–50% of them still die because of lung metastasis [43,46]. Selenium is crucial in bone metabolism and health [47,48]. The therapeutic effect of selenium against osteosarcoma has been widely explored. Given its anticancer potential, selenium may serve as a prophylaxis or therapeutic option for osteosarcoma. Therefore, this review aims to summarise the anticancer effects of selenium in primary osteosarcoma from pre-clinical and clinical studies.

2. Literature Search

The literature search was performed between 1st–25th March 2019 on PubMed and Scopus using the keywords ‘Selenium’ OR ‘Selenite’ OR ‘Selenate’ OR ‘Selenide’ OR ‘Selenol’ OR ‘Organoselenium’ OR ‘Selenocysteine’ OR ‘Selenomethionine’ OR ‘Selenoprotein’ AND ‘Osteosarcoma’. We also examined the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Original research articles regarding the anticancer effects of selenium in osteosarcoma published in English were included. A total of 20 relevant studies were included in this review.

3. Evidence from In Vitro Study

3.1. Selenium Exerts Cytotoxicity, Anti-Proliferation and Pro-Apoptotic Activities on Osteosarcoma Cells

Inorganic and organic forms of selenium including SeO2 [49], SeO32− [50], selenium-polysaccharide (Se-Poly) [51], MSeA [52,53], Se-MSC [54] and SeC [55] induce cytotoxicity, anti-proliferation and apoptosis on osteosarcoma cells. These anticancer properties of inorganic and organic selenium were studied using mouse osteosarcoma K7M2 cells [56,57] and several human osteosarcoma cell lines, such as MG-63 [49,54,55,58,59,60], U-2 OS [49,50,51,52,53,61], Saos-2 [49,62], drug-resistant Saos-2/MTX300 [54], 143B [63,64,65] and MNNG/HOS cells [66]. SeO32− concentration (as low as 10 µM) inhibits the 12−day colony formation activities of U-2 OS cells [50]. Organic selenium, such as SeC and Se-MSC, also induces cell cycle arrest and sub-G1 accumulation in MG-63 cells [54,55]. SeC-induced S-phase arrest is associated with the downregulation of cyclinA and cyclin-dependent kinase-2 (CDK-2) proteins [55]. Most of the cytotoxicity and anti-proliferation effects of selenium species are time-, concentration- or cell type-dependent [49,50,51,54,55]. For example, MSeA significantly increases the level of necrosis in U-2 OS cells within a longer treatment time period (48 h) [52]. Se-MSC inhibits the growth of MG-63 cells, but enhances that of U-2 OS cells in a concentration-independent manner [54]. This finding indicates that each selenium species may exert different effects on osteosarcoma cell models. At present, the most effective selenium species against osteosarcoma is difficult to determine on the basis of cellular findings. Direct comparison is impossible due to differences in treatment time, concentration and osteosarcoma cell models used. To date, only two studies reported the IC50 value of selenium (SeO32− and MSeA) in osteosarcoma cells [50,52]. Other selenium species such as SeO42−, selenide, selenol and selenoproteins have not been tested on osteosarcoma.

3.2. Molecular Mechanism of Selenium-Induced Osteosarcoma Cell Death

Various forms of selenium species, including SeO2 [49], SeO32− [50], Se-MSC [54] and SeC [55] induce apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells by showing typical apoptotic morphological and ultrastructural changes. However, the molecular mechanism of selenium-induced cell death is poorly characterised. Selenium-induced osteosarcoma cell death may be modulated via ROS production. SeO32− [50] and SeO32−-substituted hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles (SeHAN) [60,66] induce early ROS production in U-2 OS, MG-63 and MNNG/HOS cells. SeC also induces ROS production as shown by dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate and Mito-SOX staining [55]. ROS is an important modulator in p53 activation [67,68]. SeC also induces early p53 activation by phosphorylating the Ser 15, Ser 20 and Ser 392 sites of p53 protein [55]. Furthermore, ROS upregulation is crucial because glutathione pretreatment almost completely abrogates SeC-induced apoptosis and partially reduces p53 phosphorylation [55]. The crosstalks among p53, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) and forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) have been identified [69]. However, MSeA induces U-2 OS cell death via ATM (Ser1981) and FOXO3a activation that is independent of ROS induction and phosphorylated H2A histone family member X (γH2AX) activation [52,53]. MSeA, not SeO32−, induces the nuclear translocation of FOXO3a protein [53]. The knockdown of ATM (by KU55933 inhibitor) and FOXO3a (by hairpin RNA vector transfection) further suppressed MSeA-induced cytotoxicity [53]. Additionally, Werner Syndrome protein (WRN) serves as a potential combinational target, and its downregulation further increased the MSeA-induced U-2 OS cell death [52]. A comprehensive molecular study is required to elucidate the upstream molecular mechanisms of different selenium species in p53/ATM/FOXO3a/WRN signalling pathway axis. SeC also induces early mitochondrial dysfunction via mitochondrial fragmentation (from protonema to punctiform phenotype) and mitochondrial membrane potential loss, a possible result of p53 activation [55]. Additionally, proapoptotic proteins Bax, Bad and pTEN are transcriptionally upregulated by p53 activation [70,71]. In line with this finding, SeO32− [50], Se-MSC [54] and SeC [55] also downregulate the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL protein and upregulate the Bax and Bad protein in osteosarcoma cells. SeO32− treatment significantly increases the P53 and PTEN mRNA levels [50]. Caspase-9 is activated upon the assembly of the apoptosome after increase in the level of Bax or Bad protein, mitochondrial dysfunction and the release of mitochondrial apoptotic proteins, such as cytochrome c [70]. The activated caspase-9 subsequently activates the downstream executioner caspases (caspase-3, -6 and -7) and cleaves cellular proteins including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [72,73]. SeC activates caspase-9 and caspase-3/7 and induces PARP cleavage [55]. SeO32− also increases CASP9 and CASP3 mRNA levels and caspase-3 protein level [50]. The mRNA levels for CASP6 and CASP8 are unaffected by SeO32− treatment [50]. The current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of selenium-induced osteosarcoma apoptosis is summarised in Figure 1.
Figure 1

The molecular mechanisms of selenium-induced osteosarcoma cell death. The arrow boxes with selenium species showed the reported effects of selenium species on the apoptosis pathway. The red arrows indicate the sequent of events in apoptosis pathway.

3.3. Role of Selenium in the Tumour Microenvironment

The bone tissue is made up of several cells, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells, blood cells and endothelial cells. The osteoclasts play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma, especially in the progression and metastasis of the cancer [74]. Osteoclasts formation and activation are tightly regulated through both receptor-activation of nuclear factor κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) and macrophage-colony stimulating factor [75]. The naturally-occurring inhibitor of RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG) synthesised by osteoblasts, protects against bone loss by acting as a negative regulator for RANK/RANKL pathway [75]. The RANKL is secreted by osteocytes, osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells, as well as osteosarcoma cells [76,77]. RANKL activates its receptor, RANK, and then triggers the bone resorption by osteoclasts, which in turn promotes invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma [74]. RANKL inhibitors such as denosumab (currently in phase II clinical trial) may be effective against osteosarcoma [78,79]. Thus far, the effects of selenium on the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway remain inconclusive. SeO32− suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis through inhibition of ROS-induced signalling pathways in mouse bone marrow-derived monocytes and RAW 264.7 cell line [48,80]. Additionally, selenium (unknown species) was reported to inhibit the transcription activity of RANKL and downregulate the mRNA levels of OPG in human osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells [81] More research is required to confirm the effects of selenium in the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. Additionally, mesenchymal stem cells serve as an important modulator in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma, wherein it supports the osteosarcoma progression and metastasis via the secretion of cytokines/growth factors [74,82]. Mesenchymal stem cells can be targeted in osteosarcoma treatment via the restoration of cytokines/growth factors signalling, or transforming the stem cells into mature osteoblasts [82]. The effects of selenium on mesenchymal stem cells are not conclusive. SeO32− was reported to protect bone marrow stromal cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced inhibition of osteoblastic differentiation through inhibiting oxidative stress and ERK activation [83]. A ruthenium (II) functional selenium nanoparticles and citrate functionalised selenium nanoparticles were reported to promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells [84]. Recently, Ahmed et al. demonstrated that 48 h of SeO2 nanoparticles treatment (2−25 μg/mL) significantly increases the proliferation of rat adipose stem cells and bone marrow stem cells [85]. The induction of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells may interfere with metastasis of osteosarcoma. However, further study is required to confirm the role of mesenchymal stem cells and their therapeutic potentials in osteosarcoma. Regarding anticancer selectivity, selenium selectively exerts anticancer actions on osteosarcoma cells. Both inorganic and organic selenium exhibit no or marginal toxicity on several primary and non-tumourigenic cells including primary rat growth plate chondrocytes [86], primary mouse lung fibroblasts [57], primary human calvarial osteoblasts [87], human bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) [60,88], human umbilical cord stem cells [84], human lymphocytes [61], mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells [57,58,86], mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes [89], rat skeletal muscle L6 cells [50], human embryonic kidney 293 cells [50] and human osteoblast hFOB1.19 cells [56,59]. Additionally a low concentration (0.01–1 µM) and 1 h transient treatment of SeO32− exert radioprotective effects on chondrocytes and osteoblasts by protecting them from 20-Gy irradiation-induced cytotoxicity [86]. SeO32− (0.01–1 µM) is also not genotoxic to human blood lymphocytes and does not cause mitotic index change, chromosomal aberration or chromatid break [61]. However, SeO32− (1 µM for 1 h) substantially increases the frequency of dicentric chromosomes (but not deletion and chromatid break) in γ rays-irradiated human blood lymphocytes via an unknown mechanism [61]. Additionally, selenium nanoparticles (500–6000 nm size, 0.005 mg/mL for 1 week) also induce significant cytotoxic effects and apoptosis events on mesenchymal stem cells via morphological observation [90]. These findings require further investigation to ensure the safety of selenium in daily consumption. The molecular mechanisms on the selectivity of selenium have not been studied in detail in osteosarcoma cell models. Generally, cancerous cells are more sensitive to oxidative stress compared with normal cells [91,92]. This characteristic has been exploited by current chemotherapeutic agent, such as doxorubicin, to selectively induce osteosarcoma cell death via oxidative stress [93,94]. Therefore, the selective cytotoxicity of selenium toward osteosarcoma cells may be due to oxidative stress. A high concentration of inorganic or organic selenium induced non-selective cell death on non-tumourigenic cells and osteosarcoma cells [50,52,57,62], probably due to the overwhelming ROS production.

3.4. Selenium as a Bone Implant Material

Selenium serves as a potential candidate for bone implant material, especially for patients with osteosarcoma. In vitro osteogenic studies were conducted on selenium-doped titanium substrates [56,87], calcium phosphate [58], poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) nanocomposites [59] or HA [57,60,62,66]. These selenium (SeO32−)-doped substrates suppress the growth of mouse and human osteosarcoma cells including K7M2 [56,57], MG-63 [58,59,60], Saos-2 [62] and MNNG/HOS cells [66]. In parallel with the in vitro studies, selenium-substituted HA substrate and nanoparticles induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells with early ROS generation, mitochondria dysfunction, cytochrome c release, tBid upregulation and caspase-8,-9,-3 activation [60,66]. The addition of manganese (III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin (MnTMPyP; an oxidative stress inhibitor) inhibits selenium-substituted HA nanoparticles-induced ROS generation and osteosarcoma apoptosis [66], thus, further emphasising the importance of ROS in anticancer activities of selenium. The addition of SeO32− into bone implant substrates does not affect their basic reaction chemistry [56]. Physicochemical analysis revealed that SeO32− is dose-dependently released from the substrate surface, thereby explaining its anticancer effects [56]. Similarly, acellular media collected from SeO32−-doped substrate are proven effective against mouse osteosarcoma cells [56]. Wang et al. reported that SeO32−-doped HA nanoparticles are directly internalised into the osteosarcoma cells via nonspecific endocytosis [66]. SeO32− in the vesicles is then released into the cytosol upon the degradation of HA nanoparticles during the merger of endosome and acidic lysosome in a pH-dependent manner [66]. The release of SeO32− increases ROS generation, leading to osteosarcoma cell apoptosis in 6% and 10% SeHANs and 2µM SeO32−, but not in HA nanoparticles control and 3% SeHAN groups [66]. SeO32−-doped substrates also showed osteoinductive activities by promoting the growth of non-cancerous human osteoblast hFOB 1.19 cells [56], non-cancerous human preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells [58] and primary human calvarial osteoblasts [87]. SeO32−-doped substrates increased the growth of mouse primary lung fibroblasts [57] and BMSCs [60] under a similar treatment. SeO32−-doped titanium substrate [56], selenium (SeO32−)-doped calcium phosphate coating [58] and SeO32−coated-PLLA nanocomposites (SeNP-PLLA) [59] promote bone-forming activities, as evidenced by the increase in alkaline phosphatase activities and extracellular calcium deposition. Furthermore, SeO32−-substituted HA exhibits osteoinductive activity on partially differentiated MC3T3-E1 cells by increasing the mRNA expression of bone γ-carboxyglutamate protein 3 (BGLAP3; osteocalcin-related protein) [57]. The cytotoxicity of SeO32−-doped substrates and nanoparticles relies on its pH-dependent release into the medium and a high concentration of selenium is suggested to induce non-selective cytotoxicity [57,59,62]. A high SeO32− content (3.0 wt%) induces non-cancerous MC3T3-E1 cell death with abnormal morphological changes as early as 24 h of treatment [57]. SeO32−-containing HA (SeHA) 3.0 wt% treatment also decreases BGLAP3 expression due to its cytotoxic effect [57]. SeNP-PLLA reduces the viability of human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and non-cancerous hFOB cells, though the effects are more selective on former than on the latter [59]. Additionally, the media after overnight incubation with selenium-containing hydroxyapatite/alginate (SeHA/ALG) composite microgranules are cytotoxic to human osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells and non-cancerous hFOB 1.19 cells with almost 90% reduction on viability [62]. According to the authors, this non-selective cytotoxicity of SeHA/ALG microgranules may be due to the rapid release and accumulation of selenium in the culture media [62]. As previously discussed, excessive ROS production is one of the mechanisms of selenium in inducing unspecific cell death [95,96]. The in vitro studies of selenium and its derivatives on osteosarcoma cells are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1

The anticancer effects of selenium from in vitro studies.

Selenium TypesIn vitro ModelsTreatment ConditionResultsRef
SeO2Human osteosarcoma MG-63, U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells0.02−20 µg/mL (equivalent to 0.18–180.25 µM) for 24 h

Inhibited osteosarcoma cells proliferation in concentration (18.02 µM and above) and time-dependent (4 h and above) manner

Induced apoptosis with morphological and ultrastructural changes

[49]
SeO32−Primary rat growth plate chondrocytes and non-tumourigenic mouse osteoblast MC3T3 cellsTreatment with SeO32− (0.005–25 µM). Treatment time not indicated.

Non-cytotoxic up to 25 µM

[86]
Pretreatment with 0.05 µM SeO32−. Treatment time not indicated.

Protected primary rat growth plate chondrocytes and mouse osteoblast MC3T3 cells from 20-Gy irradiation-induced cytotoxicity

Human osteosarcoma U-2 OS cellsPretreatment of SeO32− (0.01–10 µM) for 1 h, followed by 24 h cisplatin treatment

SeO32− was non-cytotoxic to U-2 OS cells up to 10 µM

Protected U-2 OS cells from cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity

Reduced the transcription-coupled repair pathway

[61]
Human blood lymphocytesPretreatment of SeO32− (0.01–10 µM) for 1 h, followed by 150 cGy γ irradiation

Cytotoxic to lymphocytes at the highest concentration (10 µM)

Did not exert genotoxic effect or alter mitotic index up to 1 µM

Human osteosarcoma U-2 OS cells, non-tumourigenic human embryonic kidney 293 cells and rat skeletal muscle L6 cellsTreated (5–40 µM) for 24–48 h

Induced early ROS production (1 h) in U-2 OS cells via a concentration and time-dependent manner

Increased proapoptotic genes mRNA levels (PTEN, P53, BAX, CASP9 and CASP3) and decreased antiapoptotic gene BCL-2 mRNA level in U-2 OS cells (20 µM) after 48 h treatment

Increased proapoptotic proteins (Bax and caspase-3) expression and reduced anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein level in U-2 OS cells

Induced U-2 OS cell death (IC50 of 20 µM) with typical apoptotic morphology changes after 24-h treatment

Suppressed the 12−days colony formation of U-2 OS cells at 10 µM

No/less cytotoxic to 293 and L6 cells in similar concentrations

[50]
Se-PolyHuman osteosarcoma U-2 OS cellsTreated with 25–200 µg/mL of purified Se-Poly for 24 to 72 h

Treatment ≥ 50 µg/mL was cytotoxic to U-2 OS cells in a concentration-dependent manner, whereby LDH leakage was detected 24 h post treatment

[51]
MSeAHuman osteosarcoma U-2 OS cellsTreated with MSeA (0–10 µM) for 48 h with or without the knockdown of WRN

Induced cytotoxicity (IC50 value of 4 µM) after 48-h treatment

Significantly increased the event of necrosis at 4 µM concentration after 48-h treatment

Increased the phosphorylation of ATM but not H2Ax

ATM inhibitor (KU55933) reduced the MSeA-induced cytotoxicity

Knockdown of WRN further potentiated MSeA-induced cytotoxicity

[52]
Treated with 1.5 and 5 µM MSeA up to 72 h

Significantly inhibited the growth of U-2 OS cells that stably expressed with FOXO3a protein

Induced nuclear translocation of FOXO3a protein after 6-h treatment

Knockdown of FOXO3a suppressed the MSeA-induced ROS reduction, G1 arrest, cytotoxicity and apoptosis

[53]
Se-MSCHuman osteosarcoma MG-63 and U-2 OS cellsDrug-resistant human osteosarcoma Saos-2/MTX300 cellsTreated with Se-MSC (0–150 µM) up to 96 h

Slightly promoted the growth of U-2 OS cells

Induced cytotoxicity, G1 arrest and apoptosis in MG-63 cells

Induced downregulation of Bcl-2 protein and upregulation of Bax protein in MG-63 cells

[54]
Treated with Se-MSC (0–250 µM) up to 96 h

Inhibited the growth of Saos-2/MTX300 cells in a concentration and time-dependent manner

SeCHuman osteosarcoma MG-63 cellsTreated with SeC (0–20 µM) up to 72 h

Cytotoxic to MG-63 cells in a concentration and time-dependent manner

Induced S-phase arrest and downregulated of cyclinA and CDK-2 proteins

Induced MG-63 cells apoptosis with early mitochondrial membrane potential loss, mitochondrial fragmentation, ROS production, p53 activation, upregulation of Bax and Bad proapoptotic protein, downregulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL antiapoptotic protein, caspase-9 activation, caspase-3/7 activation and PARP cleavage

SeC-mediated ROS production in p53 activation

[55]
SeO32−-doping titanium substrateMouse osteosarcoma K7M2−pCl Neo cells and non-tumourigenic human osteoblast hFOB 1.19 cellsCultured on selenite-doping titanium surface for 4, 24 and/or 72 h

Reduced mouse osteosarcoma cell density after 4- and 72−h incubation

Increased the normal osteoblast cell density, ALP activity and extracellular calcium deposition of hFOB 1.19 cells after 4- and 24-h treatment

[56]
Cultured K7M2−pCl Neo cells and hFOB 1.19 cells with acellular media that collected from selenium-doping orthopaedic implant material (3 days incubation) for 3 days

Selenium was dose-dependently released into culture media after 2−3 days incubation

Significantly decreased the cellular density of mouse osteosarcoma cells but had no effect on normal osteoblast cell density

Mouse osteosarcoma osteoblast from ATCC (unknown cell types) and normal primary human calvarial osteoblastCultured on SeO32−-doping titanium surface for 3 days

Decreased the mouse osteosarcoma osteoblast density and promoted the growth of normal osteoblast

[87]
Both cancerous and normal osteoblast were co-cultured on the uncoated or SeO32−-doping titanium surfaces for 4–65 h

Suppressed the growth of osteosarcoma cells and increased the normal osteoblast density after 53 and 65 h of co-culturing

Selenium-doped calcium phosphate coatingHuman osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and non-tumourigenic preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cellsCultured the cells with selenium-doped coatings (0.6 and 2.7 at% selenium) for 24 h or up to 21 days incubation

All coatings are non-cytotoxic to MC3T3-E1 cells up to 21 days incubation

2.7at% selenium-doped coating induced osteogenic activity by increasing ALP activity in MC3T3-E1 cells after 21 days incubation

2.7at% selenium-doped coating suppressed the growth of osteosarcoma cells and promoted the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells as early as 24 h of treatment. Selenium-doped coating with 0.6at% selenium gave a similar finding only after 72 h of treatment

[58]
SeNP-PLLA nanocompositesHuman osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and non-tumourigenic foetal osteoblast hFOB cellsIncubated with SeNP-PLLA (0.025M SeO32−) for 48 h

Increased normal osteoblast bone forming activity marked by increased ALP activities

Reduced both osteosarcoma cells and normal osteoblasts but more selective on osteosarcoma cells with greater reduction of growth rate

[59]
SeHANHuman osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and normal human BMSCsSeHAN with different preparation concentration and treatment concentration (50–200 µg/mL) was added into culture medium with a monolayer of osteosarcoma cells for 3 days

SeHAN prepared from 0.882mM SeO32− (concentration not indicated) induced osteosarcoma cell death and supported the growth of normal BMSCs after 48−, 60− and 72−h incubation

Induced cytotoxicity (100–200 µg/mL) and apoptosis (200 µg/mL) in MG-63 cells after 48-h incubation

Induced early ROS production (30 min) and mitochondrial transmembrane potential loss (48 h) on MG-63 cells after 200 µg/mL treatment

[60]
Human osteosarcoma MNNG/HOS cellsSeHANs (3, 6 and 10% molar ratio of selenium and phosphate) in pH 5.0 and pH 7.4 were added to a monolayer of osteosarcoma cells at 50 µg/mL up to 24 h (2 µM sodium SeO32− as control)

More selenium was released from SeHANs in the acidic cell-free solution than neutral solution

Uptake of SeHANs by osteosarcoma transpired through endocytosis. Release of the intracellular selenium occurred via pH-dependent degradation of SeHANs during the merging of endosome and acidic lysosome

SeHAN (6 and 10%) and SeO32− increased early ROS production (6–24 h) and led to MNNG/HOS cell apoptosis after 48 h treatment

MnTMPyP inhibited SeHAN (6 and 10%) and SeO32−-induced ROS production and apoptosis in MNNG/HOS cells

10% SeHAN induced the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c, caspase-8 activation, tBid upregulation, caspase-9 activation and caspase-3 activation as early as 12 h treatment

[66]
SeHAMouse osteosarcoma K7M2 cells and normal primary mouse lung fibroblast (isolated from C57B/6/J mouse lungs)SeHA (0.102−3.0 wt%) in 2 mg/mL were added to monolayer cells for 48 h

SeHA (1.922 and 3.0 wt%) significantly reduced the viability of osteosarcoma cells and promoted the growth of normal fibroblasts

[57]
Non-tumourigenic mouse calvarial preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 cellsSeHA (0.102−3.0 wt%) in 5 mg/mL were added to fibroblast for 72 h

Exerted osteoinductive activity marked by increased BGLAP3 mRNA level (1.238–3.0 wt% SeHA)

Increased GAPDH mRNA level with the highest induction at 1.922 wt% SeHA

High SeO32− content (3.0 wt%) was cytotoxic to MC3T3-E1 cells

SeHA/ALGHuman osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells and non-tumourigenic hFOB 1.19 cellsTreated with supernatant extracts (50 and 100%) from SeHA/ALG, SeHA/ALG/RIS I and II for 24 h

Non-selective cytotoxicity (50 and 100% supernatant extracts) to both osteosarcoma cells and normal osteoblasts, marked by > 90% reduction in viability

[62]

4. Evidence from Animal and Human Studies

Several animal studies were conducted to determine the effects of selenium on osteosarcoma [49,51,55,66,97,98]. Bierke and Svedenstal initiated the study on the effects of inorganic selenium in radioactive strontium (90Sr)-induced osteosarcoma mice [98]. Vitamin E (α-tocopherol acetate) with or without SeO32− (10 µg) was administrated intraperitoneally to the mice with osteosarcoma every 2 weeks from day 105 after the 90Sr exposure until 14 months [98]. The same injection was continued after 14 months but was changed to 30-day intervals for the rest of the life span [98]. Oestrogen (polyestradiol phosphate) was administered in certain groups during 30, 60 and 90 days after the 90Sr exposure. The results showed no significant difference in osteosarcoma tumour incidence after treatment with vitamin E with or without SeO32−. Post-exposure of antioxidants, including selenium and vitamin E, is not beneficial to prevent the development of 90Sr-induced osteosarcoma. The combined treatment somehow hastened the onset of osteosarcoma regardless of oestrogen induction [98]. Several studies of inorganic and organic selenium were conducted using osteosarcoma xenograft animal models [49,51,55,66,97]. Some in vitro human osteosarcoma cell lines were used, including human osteosarcoma KOS [49], U-2 OS [51], MG-63 [55] and SOSP-9607 cells [97]. Hiraoka et al. investigated the effect of SeO2 in BALB/c nude mice implanted with osteosarcoma xenograft [49]. The back of nude mice was subcutaneously inoculated with KOS cells, and the mice were fed with SeO2−containing drinking water (0.2 and 2 µg/mL) until day 44 after inoculation [49]. SeO2 dose-dependently decreased the tumour volume to 2.5-fold lower compared with that of control [49]. SeO2 also induces apoptosis in xenograft tumour tissues without affecting visceral organs. However, this compound does not prevent tumour incidence [49]. For the organic selenium, Wang et al. reported that daily oral administration of Se-Poly isolated from Ziyang green tea (200 and 400 mg/kg) for 28 days significantly reduces tumour volume and weight of U-2 OS xenograft in BALB/c nude mice [51]. Similar to that used by Hiraoka et al., the Se-Poly is non-toxic to nude mice where it does not affect the body weight or cause any lethal incidence [51]. Wang et al. showed that the intravenous injection of SeC (5 and 10 mg/kg; every other day for 2 weeks) significantly and dose-dependently reduces the osteosarcoma MG-63 tumour xenograft volume and weight in nude mice [55]. Mechanistically, SeC induces p53 phosphorylation (Ser 15) and caspase-3 activation in tumour xenograft in a dose-dependent manner [55]. SeC also significantly suppresses cell proliferation and angiogenesis of tumour xenografts as evidenced by the downregulation of Ki-67 and CD-34 biomarkers [55]. Similar to other selenium species, SeC does not affect the body weight, suggesting the lack of systemic toxicity in nude mice [55]. The anticancer effect of SeO32−-doped substrates on osteosarcoma xenograft animal models has also been reported [66,97]. Wang et al. revealed that intratumoural injection of SeHAN for 30 days significantly reduces the tumour volume of intrafemoral human osteosarcoma SOSP-9607 xenograft in nude mice [97]. SeHAN also inhibits osteosarcoma tumour metastasis into the lung and protects other vital organs, such as liver, kidney and cardiac muscles from osteosarcoma-mediated damages [97]. The anticancer effect of SeHAN is mediated by the suppression of tumour invasion but not proliferation, as indicated by the reduction of matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9; invasion marker) and the lack of change in Ki-67 level (mitotic marker) [97]. Intratumour 10% SeHAN injection (every 3 days for 30 days) significantly reduces the tumour size, weight and volume of osteosarcoma MNNG/HOS tumour xenograft in BALB/c nude mice [66]. SeHAN induces oxidative DNA damage, which will hypothetically trigger the subsequent activation of caspases and the apoptosis in tumour tissues [66]. In parallel with in vitro studies, the anticancer effect of SeHAN is related to the release of SeO32− ions into aqueous solution [97]. SeHAN is completely degraded within tumour tissues with less calcium aggregation and blood vessel vascularization upon histological analysis [66]. Similar to findings in other selenium studies, SeHAN does not cause any significant systemic toxicity in nude mice and has no effect on body weight, lethality, haematological indices and serum biochemical profile, including aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase levels [66,97]. Furthermore, no pathological change has been detected in the liver of nude mice that received SeHAN treatment [66]. One human study was conducted by Huang et al. to identify the relationship between selenium level and osteosarcoma disease [54]. No significant difference was found in the plasma selenium levels between patients with and without osteosarcoma [54]. Selenium levels were significantly higher in osteosarcoma tissues compared with those in normal bone tissues among patients with osteosarcoma [54]. However, further investigation is needed to identify the role of high selenium levels in osteosarcoma tissues. To date, no human study has revealed the beneficial effect of selenium supplementation in preventing osteosarcoma and no clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effect of selenium in patients with osteosarcoma. Several epidemiological studies and clinical trials were conducted to determine the relationship between selenium intake and the risk of other solid cancers; however, the findings are heterogeneous [5,34,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. The NPC and Linxian Nutritional Intervention Trials reported that selenium intake reduces the risk of lung, colorectal and prostate cancer and mortality related to oesophageal and gastric cancer [33,34,35,36]. The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) and Selenium and Celecoxib (Sel/Cel) Trial showed that selenium does not reduce the risk of prostate [33,101] and colorectal cancer [106]. Additionally, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis by Vinceti et al. concluded that selenium supplementation does not reduce the overall cancer incidence or mortality [103,107]. The contradicting findings may be confounded by experimental biases, chemical forms of selenium, basal selenium status, nutritional status and lifestyle factors of the subjects [35,107]. Vinceti et al. emphasised on randomised controlled clinical trials of selenium on various cancers [103]. The osteosarcoma is not involved as currently the relevant clinical trial is not available. Further studies are required to confirm the relationship of selenium and cancer risk, especially on osteosarcoma. Table 2 summarises the effects of selenium in osteosarcoma in vivo.
Table 2

The effects of selenium in osteosarcoma animal and human studies.

Selenium TypesIn vivo Models and TreatmentPositive ResultsNegative ResultsRef
SeO2BALB/c nu/nu mice with subcutaneous human osteosarcoma KOS xenograft were fed with SeO2−containing drinking water (0.2 and 2 µg/mL) until day 44 after inoculation

Tumour xenograft volume was reduced (2 µg/mL treatment) via apoptosis induction

Did not induce apoptosis on other visceral organs

Did not suppress the tumour incidence

[49]
SeO32−α-tocopherol acetate (0.5 mg) with or without SeO32− (10 µg) was injected intraperitoneally into 90Sr-induced osteosarcoma mice every 2 weeks, starting from day 105 after exposure until 14-month. The regime changed to 30-day intervals for the rest of the life-span.

Post-exposure of antioxidants like α-tocopherol acetate and SeO32− did not prevent the development of 90Sr-induced osteosarcoma.

[98]
Se-PolyU-2 OS xenograft (100 mm3) BALB/c nude mice were orally treated with Se-Poly from Ziyang green tea (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg) daily for 28 days.

Tumour volume and tumour weight were reduced at 200 and 400 mg/kg treatment without affecting body weights or cause any lethality

[51]
SeCNude mice with MG-63 xenograft (50 mm3) was treated with intravenous injection of SeC (5 and 10 mg/kg/day) every other day for 2 weeks

Tumour xenograft volume and weight were reduced

Tumour xenografts cell proliferation and angiogenesis were suppressed

p53 phosphorylation and caspase-3 activation were induced

Body weight of nude mice was reduced

[55]
SeHANNude mice with an orthotopic intrafemorally injection of SOSP-9607 xenograft were treated with intratumoural injection of SeHAN for 30 days

Tumour volume of xenograft was reduced

Tumour metastasis into the lung was inhibited

Tumour invasion but not proliferation was suppressed

Other organs (liver, kidney and cardiac muscles) were protected from osteosarcoma-mediated damages

Good compatibility with no or lesser effect on lethality, systemic toxicity, haematological indices and biochemical profile

[97]
BALB/c nude mice with osteosarcoma xenograft (100 mm3) were treated with intratumoural injection of 10%SeHAN every 3 days for 30 days

Tumour size, weight and volume of xenograft were reduced via apoptosis induction with oxidative DNA damage and caspases activation

No effects on lethality, body weight, pathological liver changes and serum biochemical profile

SeHAN was completely degraded within tumour tissues with lesser calcium aggregation and vascularization

[66]
Selenium levelsNine osteosarcoma patients and nine non-osteosarcoma patients

No significant difference in the serum selenium levels between osteosarcoma and non-osteosarcoma patients

[54]
Paired osteosarcoma and normal bone tissues from 14 osteosarcoma patients

Higher selenium levels in osteosarcoma bone tissues

5. Conclusions

Selenium and selenium-containing proteins possess potential anticancer activity, as evidenced from cellular and animal studies. Evidence was provided that the underlying mechanism for their anticancer effects involves increased intracellular ROS generation, leading to activation of the p53/ATM/FOXO3a pathway, proapoptotic proteins and caspases. This results in cytotoxicity, antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of selenium compounds on osteosarcoma. The action of selenium can be selective on osteosarcoma cells without affecting adjacent normal cells, such as chondrocytes and fibroblasts. Moreover, this element is osteogenic for normal bone tissues. Developing SeO32−-doped bone biomaterials, which release this essential element in a controlled manner for therapeutic purposes, remains a challenge because SeO32− at a high concentration exerts non-specific cell death via oxidative stress. Another challenge is identifying the most active selenium form and dose that exert the best anti-osteosarcoma effects in the various cellular models used in previous experiments. In vivo studies showed that selenium can reduce the tumour size in animals with osteosarcoma, but does not diminish the incidence of the tumour. However, the effects of selenium on osteosarcoma have not been validated in a clinical trial. A paucity of epidemiological data revealed a relationship between selenium intake and osteosarcoma. Thus, the role of inorganic and/or organic selenium on osteosarcoma tumour formation remains unknown. These gaps in our knowledge should be filled by researchers to determine the role of selenium in preventing or treating osteosarcoma.
  99 in total

1.  Methylseleninic acid promotes antitumour effects via nuclear FOXO3a translocation through Akt inhibition.

Authors:  Míriam Tarrado-Castellarnau; Roldán Cortés; Miriam Zanuy; Josep Tarragó-Celada; Ibrahim H Polat; Richard Hill; Teresa W M Fan; Wolfgang Link; Marta Cascante
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Anticancer Drugs: Selective oxycution?

Authors:  Darren J Burgess
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Selenite activates the ATM kinase-dependent DNA repair pathway in human osteosarcoma cells with mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Marta Wojewoda; Jarosław Walczak; Jerzy Duszyński; Joanna Szczepanowska
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  Dual functional selenium-substituted hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Yanhua Wang; Jun Ma; Lei Zhou; Jin Chen; Yonghui Liu; Zhiye Qiu; Shengmin Zhang
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  L C Clark; G F Combs; B W Turnbull; E H Slate; D K Chalker; J Chow; L S Davis; R A Glover; G F Graham; E G Gross; A Krongrad; J L Lesher; H K Park; B B Sanders; C L Smith; J R Taylor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Inorganic phosphate enhances sensitivity of human osteosarcoma U2OS cells to doxorubicin via a p53-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Annamaria Spina; Luca Sorvillo; Francesca Di Maiolo; Antonietta Esposito; Raffaella D'Auria; Davide Di Gesto; Emilio Chiosi; Silvio Naviglio
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  The metastasectomy and timing of pulmonary metastases on the outcome of osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Yu-Min Huang; Chun-Han Hou; Sheng-Mou Hou; Rong-Sen Yang
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-09-14

Review 8.  Selenium as an anticancer nutrient: roles in cell proliferation and tumor cell invasion.

Authors:  Huawei Zeng; Gerald F Combs
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Selenium improves stem cell potency by stimulating the proliferation and active migration of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.

Authors:  Shin-Hyung Park; Jeong-Hwan Kim; Soo-Wan Nam; Byung-Woo Kim; Gi-Young Kim; Wun-Jae Kim; Yung Hyun Choi
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  The pro-longevity gene FoxO3 is a direct target of the p53 tumor suppressor.

Authors:  V M Renault; P U Thekkat; K L Hoang; J L White; C A Brady; D Kenzelmann Broz; O S Venturelli; T M Johnson; P R Oskoui; Z Xuan; E E Santo; M Q Zhang; H Vogel; L D Attardi; A Brunet
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  7 in total

1.  Potential Chemotherapeutic Effect of Selenium for Improved Canceration of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Anil Ahsan; Zhiwei Liu; Ruibing Su; Chencai Liu; Xiaoqi Liao; Min Su
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Selenium Compounds as Novel Potential Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Dominika Radomska; Robert Czarnomysy; Dominik Radomski; Krzysztof Bielawski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Loading and Releasing Behavior of Selenium and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride in Hydroxyapatite with Different Morphologies.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Jinhui Huang; Rui Shi; Jiawei Wei; Xiaoyu Lei; Yichen Dou; Yubao Li; Yi Zuo; Jidong Li
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Thyroid-Modulating Activities of Olive and Its Polyphenols: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kok-Lun Pang; Johanna Nathania Lumintang; Kok-Yong Chin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Antioxidant stress and anticancer activity of peptide‑chelated selenium in vitro.

Authors:  Xian Li; Xianjue Wang; Gang Liu; Yanan Xu; Xinlin Wu; Ru Yi; Feng Jin; Chula Sa; Xiulan Su
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 6.  Selenium Anticancer Properties and Impact on Cellular Redox Status.

Authors:  Lolita Kuršvietienė; Aušra Mongirdienė; Jurga Bernatonienė; Jurgita Šulinskienė; Inga Stanevičienė
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-17

7.  MicroRNA-208a-3p promotes osteosarcoma progression via targeting PTEN.

Authors:  Yutuo Fu; Yan Wang; Ke Bi; Lei Yang; Yi Sun; Boyuan Li; Zhenzhong Liu; Fulin Zhang; Yuan Li; Chao Feng; Zhenggang Bi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.