| Literature DB >> 31731408 |
Chiara Ceresa1, Francesco Tessarolo2,3, Devid Maniglio2, Erica Tambone1,2, Irene Carmagnola4, Emanuele Fedeli1, Iole Caola5, Giandomenico Nollo2,3, Valeria Chiono4, Gianna Allegrone1, Maurizio Rinaldi1, Letizia Fracchia1.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are considered two of the most important pathogens, and their biofilms frequently cause device-associated infections. Microbial biosurfactants recently emerged as a new generation of anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm agents for coating implantable devices to preserve biocompatibility. In this study, R89 biosurfactant (R89BS) was evaluated as an anti-biofilm coating on medical-grade silicone. R89BS is composed of homologues of the mono- (75%) and di-rhamnolipid (25%) families, as evidenced by mass spectrometry analysis. The antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus spp. planktonic and sessile cells was evaluated by microdilution and metabolic activity assays. R89BS inhibited S. aureus and S. epidermidis growth with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC99) of 0.06 and 0.12 mg/mL, respectively and dispersed their pre-formed biofilms up to 93%. Silicone elastomeric discs (SEDs) coated by R89BS simple adsorption significantly counteracted Staphylococcus spp. biofilm formation, in terms of both built-up biomass (up to 60% inhibition at 72 h) and cell metabolic activity (up to 68% inhibition at 72 h). SEM analysis revealed significant inhibition of the amount of biofilm-covered surface. No cytotoxic effect on eukaryotic cells was detected at concentrations up to 0.2 mg/mL. R89BS-coated SEDs satisfy biocompatibility requirements for leaching products. Results indicate that rhamnolipid coatings are effective anti-biofilm treatments and represent a promising strategy for the prevention of infection associated with implantable devices.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus spp.; anti-adhesive; anti-biofilm; antimicrobial; biofilm; biomaterials; biosurfactants; medical devices; silicone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31731408 PMCID: PMC6864460 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Negative electrospray ionization ((−)ESI) MS analysis (direct infusion) of rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 89. Two clusters of peaks revealed two sets of homologue molecules. The first set evidenced three main signals corresponding to the [M − H]− of mono-rhamnolipids. The second set evidenced three main signals corresponding to the deprotonated molecules of di-rhamnolipids.
Effect of R89 biosurfactant (R89BS) on Staphylococcus spp. planktonic cells. Results are represented as means and standard deviations (SD). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values are provided, as observed with the unaided eye. OD—optical density.
| Test Strain | R89BS Concentration (mg/mL) | OD at 595 nm ( |
|---|---|---|
| Ctrl | 0.847 ± 0.013 | |
| 0.03 | 0.772 ± 0.017 | |
| 0.06 | 0.004 ± 0.006 | |
| 0.12 | 0.001 ± 0.006 | |
| 0.25 | 0.001 ± 0.006 | |
| Ctrl | 0.918 ± 0.039 | |
| 0.03 | 0.768 ± 0.065 | |
| 0.06 | 0.630 ± 0.062 | |
| 0.12 | 0.001 ± 0.004 | |
| 0.25 | 0.001 ± 0.007 |
Figure 2Staphylococcus spp. biofilm disruption by R89 biosurfactant (R89BS). S. aureus and S. epidermidis pre-formed biofilms were co-incubated with R89BS at concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 2 mg/mL. The disrupting activity of R89BS on Staphylococcus spp. biofilms was evaluated after 24 h at 37 °C. Dots (six for each concentration) represent single experimental data.
Figure 3ATR-FTIR spectra of silicone elastomeric discs (SEDs) and SEDs coated with R89BS.
Figure 4Anti-biofilm activity of R89BS deposited on the surface of silicone discs (SEDs) by direct physical adsorption. The anti-biofilm activity of R89BS-coated SEDs on Staphylococcus spp. biofilm formation was evaluated in terms of both biofilm biomass (A) and cell metabolic activity (B) after 24, 48, and 72 h.
The 95% confidence intervals and p-values calculated for Staphylococcus spp. biofilm total biomass and cell metabolic activity in pre-coating assays. Ctrl—control.
| Time (h) | Strain | Total Biomass | Cell Metabolic Activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% Confidence Interval for the Ratio Ctrl/R89BS | 95% Confidence Interval for the Ratio Ctrl/R89BS | ||||
| 24 |
| (4.33, 5.35) | 1.50 × 10−7 | (3.65, 5.35) | 4.77 × 10−6 |
|
| (2.65, 3.04) | 2.22 × 10−8 | (3.65, 4.36) | 1.09 × 10−7 | |
| 48 |
| (4.50, 5.10) | 2.28 × 10−10 | (3.95, 4.89) | 3.27 × 10−8 |
|
| (2.30, 2.54) | 3.63 × 10−9 | (2.83, 3.10) | 4.30 × 10−11 | |
| 72 |
| (3.13, 3.49) | 6.36 × 10−9 | (3.29, 3.95) | 4.22 × 10−10 |
|
| (1.95, 2.08) | 6.43 × 10−11 | (2.56, 2.88) | 4.08 × 10−10 | |
Inhibition percentages of Staphylococcus spp. biofilm formation detected by CV and MTT assays. Relative inhibitions in the percentage of biofilm-covered surface obtained from SEM analysis are also reported.
| Time (h) | Strain | Biomass (CV) | Metabolic Activity (MTT) | Surface Coverage (SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 |
| 79.2% | 77.1% | 69.9% |
|
| 64.6% | 74.9% | 40.3% | |
| 48 |
| 79.1% | 77.2% | 81.4% |
|
| 58.4% | 66.2% | 51.1% | |
| 72 |
| 69.6% | 72.3% | 78.0% |
|
| 50.2% | 63.1% | 52.8% |
Mean absorbance values (A570) ± standard deviation obtained in the MTT assays for evaluation of live cells in the supernatants of R89BS-coated silicone elastomeric discs (SEDs) and control SEDs at the different time points.
| Time (h) |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control SEDs | R89BS-Coated SEDs | Control SEDs | R89BS-Coated SEDs | |
| 24 h | 3.06 ± 0.05 | 9.09 ± 0.19 | 18.74 ± 1.88 | 31.24 ± 4.05 |
| 48 h | 7.73 ± 0.63 | 9.79 ± 0.62 | 37.90 ± 5.12 | 45.73 ± 3.38 |
| 72 h | 8.47 ± 1.20 | 11.42 ± 1.58 | 51.09 ± 5.46 | 60.94 ± 2.86 |
Figure 5Quantitative evaluation of the biofilm surface coverage. Biofilm coverage surface was obtained by the analysis of a set of low-magnification SEM images obtained collecting a backscattered electron signal over a total surface of 29 mm2 at the SED center. R89BS-coated SEDs showed lower coverage values with respect to control SEDs, irrespectively of the incubation time points (24 h, 48 h, 72 h) for both the tested Staphylococcus spp.
Figure 6Micromorphology of the biofilm on the SED surface. Coccoid microbial cells and an extracellular matrix were present at the SED surface in different amounts according to incubation time (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) and type of sample (Ctrl: uncoated controls; R89BS: coated silicone discs). A three-dimensional architecture was also revealed in control samples at incubation times longer than 24 h. Images were captured using scanning electron microscopy, high vacuum mode (primary electron beam energy, 2 keV; original magnification 5000×).
Figure 7Cytotoxicity of R89BS on human normal lung fibroblasts (MRC5). Cytotoxicity level of different concentrations of R89BS solution. The negative control is represented by cells in standard growth medium, and the positive control is represented by fully lysate cells (0.5% Triton X).