Literature DB >> 31731258

Absence of XRCC4 and its paralogs in human cells reveal differences in outcomes for DNA repair and V(D)J recombination.

Brian Ruis1, Amy Molan1, Taylor Takasugi1, Eric A Hendrickson2.   

Abstract

The repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is an essential function performed by the Classical Non-Homologous End-Joining (C-NHEJ) pathway in higher eukaryotes. C-NHEJ, in fact, does double duty as it is also required for the repair of the intermediates formed during lymphoid B- and T-cell recombination. Consequently, the failure to properly repair DSBs leads to both genomic instability and immunodeficiency. A critical DSB protein required for C-NHEJ is the DNA Ligase IV (LIGIV) accessory factor, X-Ray Cross Complementing 4 (XRCC4). XRCC4 is believed to stabilize LIGIV, participate in LIGIV activation, and to help tether the broken DSB ends together. XRCC4's role in these processes has been muddied by the identification of two additional XRCC4 paralogs, XRCC4-Like Factor (XLF), and Paralog of XRCC4 and XLF (PAXX). The roles that these paralogs play in C-NHEJ is partially understood, but, in turn, has itself been obscured by species-specific differences observed in the absence of one or the other paralogs. In order to investigate the role(s) that XRCC4 may play, with or without XLF and/or PAXX, in lymphoid variable(diversity)joining [V(D)J] recombination as well as in DNA DSB repair in human somatic cells, we utilized gene targeting to inactivate the XRCC4 gene in both parental and XLF- HCT116 cells and then inactivated PAXX in those same cell lines. The loss of XRCC4 expression by itself led, as anticipated, to increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents as well as an increased dependence on microhomology-mediated DNA repair whether in the context of DSB repair or during V(D)J recombination. The additional loss of XLF in these cell lines sensitized the cells even more whereas the presence or absence of PAXX was scarcely negligible. These studies demonstrate that, of the three LIG4 accessory factor paralogs, the absence of XRCC4 influences DNA repair and recombination the most in human cells.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative-EJ (aEJ); Classic non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ); Paralog of XRCC4 and XLF (PAXX); Variable(Diversity)Joining recombination [V(D)J recombination]; X-ray cross complementing 4 (XRCC4); XRCC4-like factor (XLF)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731258      PMCID: PMC6952554          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  86 in total

Review 1.  Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature's Toolbox for Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Addison V Wright; James K Nuñez; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Mutations in XRCC4 cause primary microcephaly, short stature and increased genomic instability.

Authors:  Nadine Rosin; Nursel H Elcioglu; Filippo Beleggia; Pinar Isgüven; Janine Altmüller; Holger Thiele; Katharina Steindl; Pascal Joset; Anita Rauch; Peter Nürnberg; Bernd Wollnik; Gökhan Yigit
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Cernunnos, a novel nonhomologous end-joining factor, is mutated in human immunodeficiency with microcephaly.

Authors:  Dietke Buck; Laurent Malivert; Régina de Chasseval; Anne Barraud; Marie-Claude Fondanèche; Ozden Sanal; Alessandro Plebani; Jean-Louis Stéphan; Markus Hufnagel; Françoise le Deist; Alain Fischer; Anne Durandy; Jean-Pierre de Villartay; Patrick Revy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Endogenous DNA Damage as a Source of Genomic Instability in Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Tubbs; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Alternative end-joining pathway(s): bricolage at DNA breaks.

Authors:  Philippe Frit; Nadia Barboule; Ying Yuan; Dennis Gomez; Patrick Calsou
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-06

6.  DNA repair. PAXX, a paralog of XRCC4 and XLF, interacts with Ku to promote DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Takashi Ochi; Andrew N Blackford; Julia Coates; Satpal Jhujh; Shahid Mehmood; Naoka Tamura; Jon Travers; Qian Wu; Viji M Draviam; Carol V Robinson; Tom L Blundell; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Cellular response to etoposide treatment.

Authors:  Alessandra Montecucco; Giuseppe Biamonti
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  The catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates proliferation, telomere length, and genomic stability in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Brian L Ruis; Kazi R Fattah; Eric A Hendrickson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Mechanisms of programmed DNA lesions and genomic instability in the immune system.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Yu Zhang; Fei-Long Meng; Chunguang Guo; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Sister chromatid telomere fusions, but not NHEJ-mediated inter-chromosomal telomere fusions, occur independently of DNA ligases 3 and 4.

Authors:  Kate Liddiard; Brian Ruis; Taylor Takasugi; Adam Harvey; Kevin E Ashelford; Eric A Hendrickson; Duncan M Baird
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit: The Sensor for DNA Double-Strand Breaks Structurally and Functionally Related to Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Matsumoto; Anie Day D C Asa; Chaity Modak; Mikio Shimada
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 2.  Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing.

Authors:  Akhtar Ali; Wei Xiao; Masroor Ellahi Babar; Yanzhen Bi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Functional analysis of XRCC4 mutations in reported microcephaly and growth defect patients in terms of radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Anie Day D C Asa; Rujira Wanotayan; Mukesh Kumar Sharma; Kaima Tsukada; Mikio Shimada; Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  DNA End Joining: G0-ing to the Core.

Authors:  Richard L Frock; Cheyenne Sadeghi; Jodie Meng; Jing L Wang
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-09

5.  XRCC4 and MRE11 Roles and Transcriptional Response to Repair of TALEN-Induced Double-Strand DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Ronald Benjamin; Atoshi Banerjee; Xiaogang Wu; Corey Geurink; Lindsay Buczek; Danielle Eames; Sara G Trimidal; Janice M Pluth; Martin R Schiller
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.