Literature DB >> 31730766

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia and/or Early Cancer: Expert Review.

Prateek Sharma1, Nicholas J Shaheen2, David Katzka3, Jacques J G H M Bergman4.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this best practice advice article is to describe the role of Barrett's endoscopic therapy (BET) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and/or early cancer and appropriate follow-up of these patients.
METHODS: The best practice advice provided in this document is based on evidence and relevant publications reviewed by the committee. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: In BE patients with confirmed low-grade dysplasia, a repeat examination with high-definition white-light endoscopy should be performed within 3-6 months to rule out the presence of a visible lesion, which should prompt endoscopic resection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Both BET and continued surveillance are reasonable options for the management of BE patients with confirmed and persistent low-grade dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: BET is the preferred treatment for BE patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: BET should be preferred over esophagectomy for BE patients with intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1a). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: BET is a reasonable alternative to esophagectomy in patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1b) with low-risk features (<500-μm invasion in the submucosa [sm1], good to moderate differentiation, and no lymphatic invasion) especially in those who are poor surgical candidates. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In all patients undergoing BET, mucosal ablation should be applied to 1) all visible esophageal columnar mucosa; 2) 5-10 mm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction and 3) 5-10 mm distal to the gastroesophageal junction, as demarcated by the top of the gastric folds (ie, gastric cardia) using focal ablation in a circumferential fashion. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Mucosal ablation therapy should only be performed in the presence of flat BE without signs of inflammation and in the absence of visible abnormalities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: BET should be performed by experts in high-volume centers that perform a minimum of 10 new cases annually. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: BET should be continued until there is an absence of columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus on high-definition white-light endoscopy and preferably optical chromoendoscopy. In case of complete endoscopic eradication, the neosquamous mucosa and the gastric cardia are sampled by 4-quadrant biopsies. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: If random biopsies obtained from the neosquamous epithelium demonstrate intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia or subsquamous intestinal metaplasia, a repeat endoscopy should be performed and visible islands or tongues should undergo targeted focal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia (without residual columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus) should not warrant additional ablation therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: When consenting patients for BET, the most common complication of therapy to be quoted is post-procedural stricture formation, occurring in about 6% of cases. Bleeding and perforation occur at rates <1%. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: After complete eradication (endoscopic and histologic) of intestinal metaplasia has been achieved with BET, surveillance endoscopy with biopsies should be performed at the following intervals: for baseline diagnosis of HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma: at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter; and baseline diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia: at 1 and 3 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Endoscopic surveillance post therapy should be performed with high-definition white-light endoscopy, including careful inspection of the neosquamous mucosal and retroflexed inspection of the gastric cardia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: The approach to recurrent disease is similar to that of the initial therapy; visible recurrent nodular lesions require endoscopic resection, whereas flat areas of columnar mucosa in the tubular esophagus can be treated with mucosal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 16: Patients should be counseled on cancer risk in the absence of BET, as well as after BET, to allow for informed decision-making between the patient and the physician.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s Esophagus; Dysplasia; Endoscopic therapy; Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31730766     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  30 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Wide-area transepithelial sampling for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Kenneth K Wang; David A Katzka; John R Goldblum; Prashanthi N Thota; Gary W Falk; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Endoscopic Treatment and Follow-Up of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-18

4.  Outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of pathologically staged T1b esophageal cancer: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Abel Joseph; Peter V Draganov; Fauze Maluf-Filho; Hiroyuki Aihara; Norio Fukami; Neil R Sharma; Amitabh Chak; Dennis Yang; Salmaan Jawaid; John Dumot; Omar Alaber; Tiffany Chua; Rituraj Singh; Lady Katherine Mejia-Perez; Ruishen Lyu; Xuefeng Zhang; Suneel Kamath; Sunguk Jang; Sudish Murthy; John Vargo; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 10.396

5.  External validation of a model determining risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus in a cohort of U.S. veterans.

Authors:  Theresa H Nguyen; Aaron P Thrift; Gyanprakash A Ketwaroo; Xianglin L Du; Luis Leon Novelo; Rollin George; Daniel G Rosen; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 10.396

Review 6.  Evolutionary dynamics in Barrett oesophagus: implications for surveillance, risk stratification and therapy.

Authors:  Melissa Schmidt; Richard J Hackett; Ann-Marie Baker; Stuart A C McDonald; Michael Quante; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Economic evaluation of Cytosponge®-trefoil factor 3 for Barrett esophagus: A cost-utility analysis of randomised controlled trial data.

Authors:  Nicholas Swart; Roberta Maroni; Beth Muldrew; Peter Sasieni; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Stephen Morris
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-06-18

8.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: neoplasia detection rate and post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Nour Hamade; Amrit K Kamboj; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Siddharth Singh; Leslie C Hassett; David A Katzka; Charles J Kahi; Hala Fatima; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 9.524

Review 9.  Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's oesophagus: state of the art.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett's oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro; Maria O'Donovan; Roberta Maroni; Beth Muldrew; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Marcel Gehrung; Judith Offman; Monika Tripathi; Samuel G Smith; Benoit Aigret; Fiona M Walter; Greg Rubin; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.