| Literature DB >> 31730042 |
Mengting Zhu1, Weiping Cai2, Linghua Li2, Yan Guo1,3,4, Aliza Monroe-Wise5, Yiran Li1, Chengbo Zeng6,7, Jiaying Qiao1, Zhimeng Xu1, Hanxi Zhang8, Yu Zeng1, Cong Liu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several studies have investigated the effects of mobile health (mHealth) interventions on depression among people living with HIV, few studies have explored mediators of mHealth-based interventions to improve mental health in people living with HIV. Identifying influential mediators may enhance and refine effective components of mHealth interventions to improve mental health of people living with HIV.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; depression; longitudinal studies; mobile health; randomized controlled trial
Year: 2019 PMID: 31730042 PMCID: PMC6884715 DOI: 10.2196/15489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Participants’ characteristics for the intervention and control groups at baseline.
| Characteristics | Total (n=300) | Intervention (n=150) | Control (n=150) | |
| Age (years), median (interquartile range, IQR) | 27.5 (24.5-31.3) | 27.4 (24.3-31.1) | 27.8 (24.6-32.2) | .40a |
| Male, n (%) | 277 (92.3) | 142 (94.7) | 135 (90.0) | .19b |
| Educational level > high school, n (%) | 182 (60.7) | 98 (65.3) | 84 (56.0) | .12b |
| Homosexual/bisexual/uncertain, n (%) | 245 (81.7) | 130 (86.7) | 115 (76.7) | .04b |
| Married, n (%) | 38 (12.7) | 18(12.0) | 20 (13.3) | .73b |
| Employed, n (%) | 251 (83.7) | 123 (82.0) | 128 (85.3) | .53b |
| Family monthly income ≥7000 (yuan), n (%) | 124 (41.3) | 68 (45.3) | 56 (37.3) | .20b |
| Duration since HIV diagnosis (years), median (IQR) | 1.7 (0.6-3.7) | 1.7 (0.6-4.0) | 1.8 (0.6-3.9) | .62c |
| Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, mean (SD) | 24.1 (6.6) | 23.9 (6.4) | 24.3 (6.9) | .68a |
| SWCQd, positive coping, mean (SD) | 18.4 (5.8) | 18.4 (5.5) | 18.3 (6.2) | .92a |
| SWCQ, negative coping, mean (SD) | 11.8 (3.9) | 11.8 (3.9) | 11.8 (3.9) | .94a |
| HIV Stigma Scale, mean (SD) | 37.5 (7.6) | 37.1 (7.7) | 38.0 (7.5) | .31a |
aBased on t test.
bBased on chi-square test, the Fisher exact P values were used.
cBased on Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
dSWCQ: Simplified Ways of Coping Questionnaire.
Repeated measurements of depressive symptoms and potential mediators in the Run4Love randomized controlled trial.
| Variables, group | Baseline, mean (SD) | 3-month follow-up, mean (SD) | 6-month follow-up, mean (SD) | 9-month follow-up, mean (SD) | |
|
| |||||
|
| Intervention | 23.93 (6.39) | 17.87 (9.44) | 17.60 (10.06) | 17.86 (10.72) |
|
| Control | 24.25 (6.86) | 23.85 (10.11) | 24.11 (11.42) | 23.43 (11.45) |
|
| |||||
|
| Intervention | 18.39 (5.45) | 20.79 (7.33) | 21.03 (7.48) | 20.95 (7.75) |
|
| Control | 18.32 (6.15) | 17.70 (5.88) | 17.38 (6.59) | 18.31 (6.41) |
|
| |||||
|
| Intervention | 11.78 (3.85) | 11.12 (4.26) | 11.33 (4.38) | 11.71 (4.09) |
|
| Control | 11.75 (3.88) | 11.43 (3.71) | 11.32 (4.14) | 11.87 (4.09) |
|
| |||||
|
| Intervention | 37.10 (7.67) | 34.28 (9.19) | 34.30 (8.52) | 33.98 (9.01) |
|
| Control | 37.99 (7.54) | 37.50 (8.27) | 37.35 (9.92) | 37.79 (9.99) |
Figure 1Measurements of depressive symptoms, coping, and HIV-related stigma over time. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2Conditional latent growth curve modeling examining the effects of the mobile health intervention on the outcome and potential mediators. Continuous lines with arrows indicate statistically significant paths. Dotted lines indicate nonsignificant paths. The first and second factor loadings of the latent slope of all models were set to 1, the third and fourth factor loadings of the latent slope of all models were freely estimated. Group: intervention or control group; DS: depressive symptoms; HS: HIV-related stigma; PC: positive coping; NC: negative coping.
Model fit indices of all latent growth curve models.
| Model | CFIa | RMSEAb | SRMRc | Relative chi-square ratio (df) |
| Reference | >0.90 | <0.08 | <0.08 | <3.0 |
| LGCMd for depressive symptoms | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.4 (7) |
| LGCM for positive coping | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.8 (7) |
| LGCM for negative coping | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 1.1 (7) |
| LGCM for HIV-related stigma | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.8 (7) |
| Final LGCM | 0.98 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.7 (56) |
aCFI: comparative fit index.
bRMSEA: root mean square error of approximation.
cSRMR: standardized root mean square residual.
dLGCM: latent growth curve model.
Figure 3Latent growth curve modeling examining mediating effects between the mobile health intervention and changes in depressive symptoms. Continuous lines with arrows indicate statistically significant paths. Dotted lines indicate nonsignificant paths. The first and second factor loadings of the latent slope of the model were set to 1, the third and fourth factor loadings of the latent slope of the model were freely estimated. Group: intervention or control group; PC: positive coping; HS: HIV-related stigma; DS: depressive symptoms.
Coefficients and bootstrapping CIs of the final parallel-process latent growth curve modeling.
| Effect | Estimate | 95% BCIa | Standardized estimate | |
|
| ||||
|
| Slope of positive coping | −1.26b | −1.89 to −0.62 | −0.59 |
|
| Slope of HIV-related stigma | 0.87b | 0.48 to 1.27 | 0.52 |
|
| Group | −0.06 | −2.15 to 2.03 | −0.00 |
|
| Intercept of positive coping | −0.22 | −0.47 to 0.04 | −0.15 |
|
| Intercept of HIV-related stigma | 0.08 | −0.06 to 0.22 | 0.08 |
|
| ||||
|
| Group | 2.28b | 1.06 to 3.50 | 0.37 |
|
| Intercept of depressive symptoms | 0.20b | 0.04 to 0.36 | 0.37 |
|
| Intercept of HIV-related stigma | −0.10 | −0.22 to 0.02 | −0.21 |
|
| ||||
|
| Group | −1.96b | −3.22 to−0.70 | −0.25 |
|
| Intercept of positive coping | −0.35b | −0.57 to−0.13 | −0.40 |
|
| Intercept of depressive symptoms | −0.14b | −0.28 to−0.01 | −0.21 |
|
| ||||
|
| Via the slope of positive coping | −2.86b | −4.78 to−0.94 | −0.22 |
|
| Via the slope of HIV-related stigma | −1.71b | −3.03 to−0.40 | −0.13 |
| Total indirect effect | −4.57b | −7.01 to −2.14 | −0.35 | |
aBCI: bootstrapped CIs.
bCI does not contain zero.