| Literature DB >> 31729383 |
Jongha Lee1,2, Hye Rim Cho1,3, Gi Doo Cha1,2, Hyunseon Seo1,2,4, Seunghyun Lee3, Chul-Kee Park5, Jin Wook Kim5, Shutao Qiao6, Liu Wang6, Dayoung Kang1,2, Taegyu Kang1,2, Tomotsugu Ichikawa7, Jonghoon Kim1,2, Hakyong Lee1,2, Woongchan Lee1,2, Sanghoek Kim8, Soon-Tae Lee9, Nanshu Lu6, Taeghwan Hyeon1,2, Seung Hong Choi10,11, Dae-Hyeong Kim12,13.
Abstract
Implantation of biodegradable wafers near the brain surgery site to deliver anti-cancer agents which target residual tumor cells by bypassing the blood-brain barrier has been a promising method for brain tumor treatment. However, further improvement in the prognosis is still necessary. We herein present novel materials and device technologies for drug delivery to brain tumors, i.e., a flexible, sticky, and biodegradable drug-loaded patch integrated with wireless electronics for controlled intracranial drug delivery through mild-thermic actuation. The flexible and bifacially-designed sticky/hydrophobic device allows conformal adhesion on the brain surgery site and provides spatially-controlled and temporarily-extended drug delivery to brain tumors while minimizing unintended drug leakage to the cerebrospinal fluid. Biodegradation of the entire device minimizes potential neurological side-effects. Application of the device to the mouse model confirms tumor volume suppression and improved survival rate. Demonstration in a large animal model (canine model) exhibited its potential for human application.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31729383 PMCID: PMC6858362 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13198-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Materials, device design, and wireless actuation of the bioresorbable electronic patch (BEP). a Schematic illustration of the BEP (left) and the molecular structure of drug-containing oxidized starch (OST) (right). b Schematic illustration of the BEP and its constituent materials (left), and their biodegradation into hydrolyzed products (right). c Image of the BEP, which includes a bioresorbable wireless heater and a temperature sensor on an oxidized starch (OST) patch containing doxorubicin (DOX). d Image of the sterilized BEP before implantation. e Images of brain craniotomy in the canine model before (left) and after (right) BEP implantation. f Schematic illustration of localized and penetrative drug delivery to deep GBM tissues by the BEP with wireless mild-thermic actuation
Fig. 2Materials, device characterization, and biocompatibiltiy. a Illustration of the trapped and conjugated DOX to the OST polymer chain. b Shear stress for detachment of the OST film with the indicated level of oxidized units from the bovine muscle tissue. Inset shows a schematic illustration of the shear stress measurement. Each experiment was repeated at least three times and error bars represent the standard error of the mean value. c Optical microscope image (gray) overlapped by the fluorescence microscope image (red) at the brain-BEP interface. Image of a canine brain after diffusion of DOX from the BEP (inset). d Cumulative release of DOX from unmodified starch (black), OST (blue), and PLA-encapsulated OST (red) in 37 °C phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution for 4 weeks. e Illustration of the flexible bifacial patch conformally adhered on the brain cavity surface. f Measurement of DOX concentration (dotted circle) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after 1 week from implantation by HPLC. Inset shows HPLC measurement of standard DOX solutions. g Optical camera image during the intracranial BEP implantation surgery (left) and at 10 weeks after implantation (right). Quantification of the immunohistochemistry using BALB/c nude mice at different time points for the sham (red) and BEP implantation (blue) group (n = 7–8 for each group and time): h for GFAP and i for Iba-1. (NS; p > 0.05 by paired t-test). Line: median box: 25th–75th percentiles, Whisker: min to max, *p < 0.05 by Man–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction
Fig. 3Wireless mild-thermic drug delivery. a Image of radio frequency (RF) wireless mild-thermic actuation in the canine GBM model. b Schematic illustration of implanted BEPs and images of the mild-thermic actuation: optical (left) and infrared camera images before (middle) and during (right) the wireless mild-thermic actuation. c Experimentally measured temperature change of the BEP by wireless heating depending on the coil-to-heater distance. The inset shows the temperature change depending on the induced current. d Cumulative release of DOX from OST in PBS at 37 °C (blue) and 42 °C (orange) for 4 weeks. e In vivo measurement of the DOX concentration at the indicated time points after implantation of the BEP without mild-thermic actuation. f In vivo measurement of the DOX concentration at 15 h after implantation of the BEP with the pulsed mild-thermic actuation; control (black; no pulse), 1 pulse (red), or 4 pulses (blue). g Fluorescence microscope images after 15 h implantation, which show DOX diffusion from the BEP into U87-MG tumor tissues in the mouse model in vivo without (left) and with (right) the mild-thermic actuation. h Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay of U87-MG tumor tissues without (left) and with (right) the mild-thermic actuation. i Proportion of DOX-stained cells after exposure to the DOX solution for 1 h at 37 and 42 °C, measured by flow cytometry. Each experiment was repeated at least four times and error bars represent the standard error of the mean value. j Effect of elevated temperatures on U87-MG tumor tissues, observed by survivin expression. k Contour plot of the temperature distribution during the mild-thermic actuation. l Simulated temperature profile from the BEP surface into the brain under various heater temperatures. The shadowed part represents the temperature that can be tolerated by the brain tissue
Fig. 4Therapeutic efficacy of the BEP in BALB/c nude mouse and canine brain tumor models. a Therapy protocol employed to investigate the BEP in both mouse and canine model. b Representative axial T2-weighted MR images of the control wafer group, and c OST + Heating group at the indicated time points after surgery in the mouse model. d Time dependent mean tumor volumes of the indicated groups (left) and box-and-whisker plots of tumor volumes at 26 days after surgery (right). n = 6, 7, 6, 7, 6 for IV, Heating, OST, OST + Heating, and control wafer group, respectively in the mouse model. Line: median Box: 25th–75th percentiles, Whisker: min to max, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Man–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. e Kaplan–Meier survival rate plots of the indicated treatment group in the mouse model, *p < 0.05 by log-rank test with Bonferroni correction. f Histology images of tissues near the J3T-1 implantation site stained with H&E in the canine model. g Coronal T2- (top) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images of the tumor without (left) and with (right) the BEP treatment in the canine model. h Fluorescence images of DOX diffused from the BEP into the J3T-1 tissue in the canine model in vivo without (left) and with the mild-thermic actuation in the canine model. i TUNEL assay of the BEP treatment case after 2 days from the implantation (left) and its magnified view (right) in the canine model. j TUNEL assay of the control wafer treatment case after 2 days from the implantation (left) and its magnified view (right) in the canine model