| Literature DB >> 31727940 |
Antonella Fatica1, Francesco Di Lucia2, Stefano Marino3, Arturo Alvino3, Massimo Zuin4, Hayo De Feijter2, Boudewijn Brandt2, Sergio Tommasini2, Francesco Fantuz5, Elisabetta Salimei3.
Abstract
In order to limit the smoking tobacco sector crisis, a new non-GMO Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Solaris was proposed as oil seed crop. Residues of oil extraction were successfully used in swine nutrition. The aim of this study was to explore the full potential of this innovative tobacco cultivar as multitasking feedstock non interfering with the food chain. In the triennium 2016-2018, samples from whole plant, inflorescence and stem-leaf biomass were collected in three experimental sites and analysed for chemical constituents, including fibre fractions, sugars and starch, macro-minerals and total alkaloids. The KOH soluble protein content and the amino-acid profile were also investigated as well as the biochemical methane potential. All the analyses were performed according to official methods and results were compared with values reported in literature for conventional lignocellulosic crops and agro-industry residues. The average protein content, ranging from 16.01 to 18.98 g 100 g-1 dry matter respectively for stem-leaf and whole plant samples, and their amino-acid profile are consistent with values reported for standard grass plant. These findings suggest the potential use of cv. Solaris in industrial food formulations. Moreover, considering the average content of both fibre available for fermentations (72.6% of Neutral Detergent Fibre) and oils and fats (7.92 g 100 g-1 dry matter), the whole plant biomass of cv. Solaris showed good attitude to anaerobic fermentation, confirmed by the biochemical methane potential of whole plant (168 Nm3 t-1 organic matter). Similarly, results allow to define the cv. Solaris biomass as a good quality forage apt to ensiling for its chemical composition. The low total alkaloids content of cv. Solaris, in average 0.3 g 100 g-1 dry matter, was previously reported not to affect growth performances and welfare traits of dairy heifers. These are the first results showing the multitasking potential use of cv. Solaris biomass, that could allow the recovery of tobacco cultivation know-how especially in marginal areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31727940 PMCID: PMC6856119 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53237-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Solaris (left) with reduced size and elevated number of flowers compared to traditional cultivar of smoking tobacco (right).
Figure 2Thermal-pluvio-metric diagrams for 2016, 2017 and 2018 about Vicenza[7] (a), Chieti[8] (b) and Perugia[9] (c) province.
Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Solaris biomass produced per year in the study.
| Biomass | |
|---|---|
| Mean, t ha−1 | 70.82 |
| s.d., t ha−1 | 5.73 |
| Min, t ha−1 | 65.00 |
| Max, t ha−1 | 76.58 |
s.d. = standard deviation.
Average content (±s.d.) of chemical components and biochemical methane potential of cv. Solaris. Values reported in literature for grass and legume plants are shown for comparison[15–17,27,28].
| Unit | cv. | cv. | cv. | Grass plant | Legume plant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic matter | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 82.80 (2.36) | 85.69 (2.37) | 80.09 (3.83) | 90.75 (3.04) | 89.56 (1.92) |
| C. Protein | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 18.98 (2.36) | 24.85 (1.96) | 16.01 (2.64) | 11.41 (3.58) | 19.00 (2.73) |
| Sol. Protein | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 6.83 (1.04) | 10.97 (1.08) | 4.93 (0.91) | n.a. | n.a. |
| C. Oil and Fat | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 7.92 (4.06) | 14.16 (6.99) | 3.06 (1.53) | 2.88 (0.50) | 2.64 (0.57) |
| C. Ash | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 17.20 (2.36) | 14.31 (2.37) | 19.91 (3.83) | 9.25 (3.04) | 10.44 (1.92) |
| NDF | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 46.64 (4.07) | 45.97 (10.77) | 47.65 (6.96) | 58.88 (8.01) | 49.27 (6.51) |
| ADF | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 37.49 (4.99) | 37.48 (8.67) | 36.26 (7.49) | 33.52 (7.67) | 34.31 (6.23) |
| ADL | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 12.87 (3.87) | 17.72 (7.11) | 8.14 (2.57) | 5.68 (2.69) | 7.59 (1.65) |
| Available. Fibre | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 33.77 (4.14) | 28.24 (5.85) | 39.51 (4.80) | 53.20 (6.55) | 41.68 (6.87) |
| Hemicellulose | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 9.14 (2.07) | 8.48 (4.28) | 11.39 (2.73) | 22.11 (3.70) | 14.52 (8.05) |
| Cellulose | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 24.62 (4.31) | 19.76 (2.88) | 28.12 (5.02) | 30.82 (5.65) | 27.16 (5.38) |
| Starch | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 1.75 (073) | 2.32 (1.77) | 1.67 (0.75) | 24.19 (6.04) | n.a |
| Sugar | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 0.88 (0.56) | 1.41 (0.87) | 0.42 (0.26) | 8.41 (7.65) | 1.26 (0.96) |
| Nicotine | g 100 g−1 d.m. | 0.30 (0.20) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Biomethane | Nm3 t−1 o.m. | 168.0 (47.0) | n.a. | n.a. | 135.0 (8.7) | 202.5 (53.0) |
C. Protein = crude proteins; Sol. Protein = KOH Soluble Proteins; C. Oil and Fat = Crude oils and fats; C. Ash = Crude ash; NDF = Neutral Detergent Fibre; ADF = Acid Detergent Fibre; ADL = Lignin Acid Detergent; Nicotine = total alkaloids as nicotine; d.m = dry matter; o.m = organic matter; n.a. = not available.
Average content (±s.d.) in amino acid (g/100 g d.m.) of cv. Solaris. Values reported in literature for grass and legume plants are shown for comparison[15,25].
| Amino acid | cv. | cv. | cv. | Grass plant | Legume plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lys | 0.63 (0.29) | 0.83 (0.53) | 0.51 (0.05) | 0.79 | 1.29 |
| Met | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Met + Cys | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.71 | 0.86 |
| Trp | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.13 | 0.18 |
| Thr | 0.69 (0.21) | 0.91 (0.29) | 0.57 (0.08) | 0.72 | 10.1 |
| Leu | 1.19 (0.35) | 1.53 (0.42) | 0.99 (0.15) | 1.22 | 1.77 |
| Ile | 0.65 (0.14) | 0.85 (0.21) | 0.52 (0.03) | 0.65 | 1.02 |
| Val | 0.84 (0.21) | 1.11 (0.27) | 0.68 (0.04) | 0.55 | 1.24 |
| His | 0.29 (0.08) | 0.44 (0.14) | 0.23 (0.02) | 0.32 | 0.52 |
| Pro | 0.94 (0.98) | 1.37 (1.60) | 0.42 (0.08) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Arg | 3.74 (0.31) | 1.58 (0.14) | 0.65 (0.08) | 0.85 | 1.2 |
| Phe | 0.72 (0.19) | 0.98 (0.28) | 0.58 (0.03) | 1.33 (Phe + Tyr) | 2.06 (Phe + Tyr) |
| Tyr | 0.4 (0.11) | 0.56 (0.18) | 0.34 (0.12) | ||
| Gly | 0.92 (0.30) | 1.16 (0.40) | 0.73 (0.06) | 1.52 (Gly + Ser) | 2.11 (Gly + Ser) |
| Ser | 0.69 (0.21) | 0.96 (0.33) | 0.58 (0.06) | ||
| Ala | 0.91 (0.23) | 1.13 (0.34) | 0.78 (0.07) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Asp | 1.89 (0.95) | 2.95 (2.5) | 1.18 (0.10) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Glu | 2.06 (0.7) | 3.08 (0.78) | 1.39 (0.16) | n.d. | n.d. |
n.a. = not available; Lys = lysine; Met = methionine; Cys = cysteine; Trp = tryptophan; Thr = threonine; Leu = leucine; Ile = isoleucine; Val = valine; His = histidine; Pro = proline; Glu = glutamic acid; Gly = glycine; Ser = serine, Arg = arginine; Phe = phenylalanine; Tyr = tyrosine; Asp = aspartic acid; Ala = alanine.
Average (±s.d.) content (g/100 g d.m.) of minerals measured in samples of cv. Solaris. Values reported in literature for grass and legume plants are shown for comparison[15,17].
| cv. | cv. | cv. | Grass plant | Legume plant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 2.48 (0.57) | 1.35 (0.31) | 3.35 (0.94) | 0.43 (0.14) | 1.30 (0.35) |
| P | 0.27 (0.04) | 0.39 (0.03) | 0.21 (0.04) | 0.31 (0.13) | 0.27 (0.07) |
| Mg | 0.62 (0.16) | 0.51 (0.11) | 0.73 (0.13) | 0.15 (0.05) | 0.24 (0.10) |
| K | 4.33 (1.28) | 3.96 (0.66) | 4.13 (0.94) | 1.85 (0.57) | 2.12 (0.42) |
| Na | 0.0439 (0.0288) | 0.0367 (0.0274) | 0.0521 (0.0415) | 0.05 (0.04) | 0.02 (0.01) |
| Cl | 1.52 (0.28) | 1.09 (0.14) | 1.69 (0.35) | n.a. | n.a. |
Ca: Calcium, P: Phosphorus, Mg: Magnesium, K: Potassium, Na: Sodium, Cl: Chloride, n.a.: not available.