Literature DB >> 31727624

Efficacy and safety data for the XEN45 implant at 2 years: a retrospective analysis.

Itay Elimelech Gabbay1,2,3, Felicity Allen4, Christine Morley4, Tahmina Pearsall5, Oliver Martyn Bowes4, Simon Ruben4.   

Abstract

AIM: To report efficacy and safety measures for XEN45 in a National Health Service setting after 24-month follow-up.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, non-comparative audit of records of patients who underwent XEN45 procedure between June 2015 and May 2017. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and number of antihypertensive medications at each timepoint. Failure was defined as requiring further surgery or removal of XEN. Success was defined as 20% reduction of IOP without additional glaucoma medications or reduction in antihypertensive medications without increase in baseline IOP. Needling rates were assessed and subgroup analysis was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 151 eyes were included in the study. The main diagnoses were primary open angle glaucoma (84.1%), angle closure glaucoma (8.6%) and refractory glaucoma (7.3%). Stand-alone procedure was performed in 62.3% and combined phaco-XEN was done in 37.7%. The mean IOP at baseline was 22.1±6.5 mm Hg, and the mean IOP at 12 and 24 months was 15.4±5.9 mm Hg and 14.5±3.3 mm Hg, respectively (p<0.001). The mean number of medications was 2.77±1.1 at baseline, and 0.3±0.7 and 0.5±1.0 medications at 12 and 24 months, respectively (p<0.001). 25% of patients failed at the 24-month timepoint. Needling was required in 37.7% of patients at 24 months. Non-Caucasian ethnicity was found to be related to higher failure rate. No significant adverse events were noted.
CONCLUSION: XEN45 is a viable, effective and safe procedure after 2 years of follow-up. Patients should be advised regarding failure rate as well as possible need for bleb revisions and medication use. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glaucoma; intraocular pressure; treatment surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31727624     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-313870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  11 in total

1.  Glaucoma medical treatment as a predictor of XEN45 subconjunctival gel implant hypotensive efficacy.

Authors:  Carmen Méndez-Hernández; Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Ramón Torres-Imaz; Pilar Peña-Urbina; Lucía Perucho-González; Julián García-Feijoo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Outcomes of XEN 63 Device at 18-Month Follow-Up in Glaucoma Patients: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Fea; Martina Menchini; Alessandro Rossi; Chiara Posarelli; Lorenza Malinverni; Michele Figus
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  24-month outcomes of XEN45 gel implant versus trabeculectomy in primary glaucoma.

Authors:  Boonsong Wanichwecharungruang; Nitee Ratprasatporn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Three-year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Herbert Reitsamer; Vanessa Vera; Simon Ruben; Leon Au; Jorge Vila-Arteaga; Miguel Teus; Markus Lenzhofer; Andrew Shirlaw; Zhanying Bai; Mini Balaram; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and XEN gel microstent implantation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective monocentric comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Theresa Theilig; Matus Rehak; Catharina Busch; Caroline Bormann; Marc Schargus; Jan Darius Unterlauft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Surgical and Perioperative Considerations for the Treatment of Cataract in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Kleonikos Tsakiris; George Kontadakis; Panagiotis Georgoudis; Zisis Gatzioufas; Athanasios Vergados
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  The Outcomes of XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Zhu Chen; Zhi-Qiao Liang; Kang-Yi Yang; Kun Lv; Yao Ma; Meng-Yang Li; Hui-Juan Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Efficacy of the XEN-Implant in Glaucoma and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Huub J Poelman; Jan Pals; Parinaz Rostamzad; Wichor M Bramer; Roger C W Wolfs; Wishal D Ramdas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Functional Monitoring after Trabeculectomy or XEN Microstent Implantation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Indices-A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marc Schargus; Catharina Busch; Matus Rehak; Jie Meng; Manuela Schmidt; Caroline Bormann; Jan Darius Unterlauft
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  Needling and open filtering bleb revision after XEN-45 implantation-a retrospective outcome comparison.

Authors:  Stefan Steiner; Hemma Resch; Barbara Kiss; Daniel Buda; Clemens Vass
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.