| Literature DB >> 31727077 |
María Muñoz-San Martín1, Gemma Reverter1, Rene Robles-Cedeño1,2,3, Maria Buxò4, Francisco José Ortega5, Imma Gómez1, Jordi Tomàs-Roig1, Naiara Celarain1, Luisa María Villar2,6, Hector Perkal1, José Manuel Fernández-Real3,5, Ester Quintana7,8,9, Lluís Ramió-Torrentà10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported as deregulated in active brain lesions derived from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In there, these post-transcriptional regulators may elicit very important effects but proper identification of miRNA candidates as potential biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets is scarcely available.Entities:
Keywords: Active lesions; Epigenetics; Gadolinium positive (Gd+); Inflammation; Multiple sclerosis; miRNAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31727077 PMCID: PMC6857276 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-019-1590-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Demographic data of the study cohort
| Gd− | Gd+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 31.15 ± 10.37 | 36.15 ± 8.65 | 0.081 |
| Sex (male/female) | 0.818 | ||
| Male | 6 (30.00%) | 7 (26.92%) | |
| Female | 14 (70.00%) | 19 (73.08%) | |
| EDSS at sampling (median, Q1–Q2) | 2 (1–2.5) | 2 (1.5–2.13) | 0.819 |
| OCGB (N/P) | 0.432 | ||
| Negative | 1 (5.26%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
| Positive | 18 (94.74%) | 25 (100.00%) | |
| LS_OCMB (N/P) | 0.393 | ||
| Negative | 14 (73.68%) | 16 (61.54%) | |
| Positive | 5 (26.32%) | 10 (38.46%) | |
| T2 lesions | 0.004 | ||
| < 9 lesions | 12 (66.67%) | 4 (16.67%) | |
| 10–20 lesions | 5 (27.78%) | 10 (41.67%) | |
| 21–50 lesions | 1 (5.56%) | 8 (33.33%) | |
| 51–100 lesions | 0 (0.00%) | 2 (8.33%) |
Gd− patients without gadolinium-enhanced lesions, Gd+ patients with gadolinium-enhanced lesions; SD standard deviation, OCBG oligoclonal IgG bands; N/P negative/positive, LS_OCMB lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM bands
Differential miRNA expression between groups in CSF
| Gd | Gd + ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Q1-Q3 | Median | Q1–Q3 | ||
| miR-21 | 0.014 | 0.010–0.022 | 0.029 | 0.013–0.052 | 0.024 |
| miR-146a | 0.065 | 0.031–0.136 | 0.135 | 0.082–0.239 | 0.016 |
| miR-146b | 0.008 | 0.002–0.020 | 0.021 | 0.012–0.052 | 0.030 |
| miR-155 | 0.007 | 0.002–0.016 | 0.011 | 0.006–0.019 | 0.163 |
| miR-223 | 0.066 | 0.043–0.328 | 0.124 | 0.088–0.226 | 0.232 |
| miR-320 | 0.038 | 0.010–0.048 | 0.042 | 0.026–0.087 | 0.271 |
| miR-328 | 0.007 | 0.003–0.012 | 0.011 | 0.005–0.026 | 0.143 |
Gd− patients without gadolinium-enhanced lesions, Gd+ patients with gadolinium-enhanced lesions; Q1–Q3 first quartile–third quartile
Fig. 1Differentially expressed miRNAs. Dot plots for normalized value of a miR-21, b miR-146a, and c miR-146b in patients according to the presence of Gd+ lesions in the brain. The line indicates the median and Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine statistical differences between groups
Capacity of selected miRNAs to detect inflammatory activity in CNS
| AUC | 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | LR+ | LR− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-21 | 0.703 | 0.543–0.863 | 60.00 | 77.78 | 2.70 | 0.51 |
| miR-146a | 0.728 | 0.553–0.904 | 90.48 | 64.71 | 2.56 | 0.15 |
| miR-146b | 0.712 | 0.531–0.894 | 81.82 | 66.67 | 2.45 | 0.27 |
| miR-21 + miR-146a + miR-146b | 0.867 | 0.736–0.997 | 94.12 | 69.23 | 3.06 | 0.08 |
AUC area under curve, CI confidence interval, LR+ positive likelihood ratio, LR− negative likelihood ratio
Fig. 2Scatter plot of correlation between NF-L in CSF. Scatter plots showing the relationship between NF-L levels in CSF and expression levels of miR-21 (a), miR-146a (b), miR-146b (c), and number of Gd+ lesions (d). Significant positive correlations were observed in all cases, illustrating a link between axonal damage and candidate miRNAs expression. rs: Rho Spearman; p: p value
Correlations between radiological and clinical data with miRNAs expression
| No. of Gd+ lesions | No. of T2 lesions | Basal EDSS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-21 | 0.379 | 0.015 | 0.377 | 0.017 | 0.440 | 0.003 |
| miR-146a | 0.463 | 0.004 | 0.125 | 0.474 | 0.030 | 0.856 |
| miR-146b | 0.349 | 0.040 | 0.004 | 0.984 | − 0.299 | 0.072 |
| miR-155 | 0.270 | 0.077 | 0.308 | 0.047 | − 0.010 | 0.949 |
| miR-223 | 0.159 | 0.309 | 0.113 | 0.481 | 0.249 | 0.099 |
| miR-320 | 0.187 | 0.243 | 0.035 | 0.831 | 0.035 | 0.825 |
| miR-238 | 0.298 | 0.073 | 0.213 | 0.211 | − 0.089 | 0.592 |
s Spearman’s Rho coefficient
Fig. 3Pathway and target analysis of miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-146b. a Visualization of the significantly associated GO biological processes using REVIGO. The semantic similarity-scatterplot shows the cluster representatives after the redundancy reduction. The bubble size indicates the frequency of the GO term and the color indicates the log10 (adjusted p value). Color legend is shown in the left corner of the panel b: microRNA-target interaction network generated by Cytoscape software. Targets with strong experimental evidence for miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-146b were retrieved from miRTarBase [20]. Blue-colored targets correspond to those targets shared by miR-21 and miR-146a; pink-colored targets corresponds to those targets shared by miR-146a and miR-146b; yellow-colored targets corresponds to those targets shared by the three deregulated miRNAs