Literature DB >> 31726556

Building an automatic pollen monitoring network (ePIN): Selection of optimal sites by clustering pollen stations.

Jose Oteros1, Mikhail Sofiev2, Matt Smith3, Bernard Clot4, Athanasios Damialis5, Marje Prank2, Matthias Werchan6, Reinhard Wachter6, Alisa Weber7, Susanne Kutzora7, Stefanie Heinze7, Caroline E W Herr7, Annette Menzel8, Karl-Christian Bergmann6, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann9, Carsten B Schmidt-Weber1, Jeroen T M Buters10.   

Abstract

Airborne pollen is a recognized biological indicator and its monitoring has multiple uses such as providing a tool for allergy diagnosis and prevention. There is a knowledge gap related to the distribution of pollen traps needed to achieve representative biomonitoring in a region. The aim of this manuscript is to suggest a method for setting up a pollen network (monitoring method, monitoring conditions, number and location of samplers etc.). As a case study, we describe the distribution of pollen across Bavaria and the design of the Bavarian pollen monitoring network (ePIN), the first operational automatic pollen network worldwide. We established and ran a dense pollen monitoring network of 27 manual Hirst-type pollen traps across Bavaria, Germany, during 2015. Hierarchical cluster analysis of the data was then performed to select the locations for the sites of the final pollen monitoring network. According to our method, Bavaria can be clustered into three large pollen regions with eight zones. Within each zone, pollen diversity and distribution among different locations does not vary significantly. Based on the pollen zones, we opted to place one automatic monitoring station per zone resulting in the ePIN network, serving 13 million inhabitants. The described method defines stations representative for a homogeneous aeropalynologically region, which reduces redundancy within the network and subsequent costs (in the study case from 27 to 8 locations). Following this method, resources in pollen monitoring networks can be optimized and allergic citizens can then be informed in a timely and effective way, even in larger geographical areas.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobiology; Air quality; Automatic pollen monitoring; BAA500; Biomonitoring network; Pollen

Year:  2019        PMID: 31726556     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

Review 1. 

Authors:  Jeroen Buters; Jose Oteros; Robert Gebauer; Katharina Heigl
Journal:  Allergo J       Date:  2020-05-08

2.  Clustering approach for the analysis of the fluorescent bioaerosol collected by an automatic detector.

Authors:  Gintautas Daunys; Laura Šukienė; Lukas Vaitkevičius; Gediminas Valiulis; Mikhail Sofiev; Ingrida Šaulienė
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development and application of a method to classify airborne pollen taxa concentration using light scattering data.

Authors:  Kenji Miki; Toshio Fujita; Norio Sahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites.

Authors:  Maria Pilar Plaza; Franziska Kolek; Vivien Leier-Wirtz; Jens Otto Brunner; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Athanasios Damialis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The need for Pan-European automatic pollen and fungal spore monitoring: A stakeholder workshop position paper.

Authors:  Fiona Tummon; Lucas Alados Arboledas; Maira Bonini; Benjamin Guinot; Martin Hicke; Christophe Jacob; Vladimir Kendrovski; William McCairns; Eric Petermann; Vincent-Henri Peuch; Oliver Pfaar; Michaël Sicard; Branko Sikoparija; Bernard Clot
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.657

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.