| Literature DB >> 31726468 |
Samuel K Handelman1,2, Roberto Romero1,3,4,5,6, Adi L Tarca1,7,8, Percy Pacora1,7, Brian Ingram9, Eli Maymon1,10, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa1,7, Sonia S Hassan1,7,11, Offer Erez1,7,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In comparison to the non-pregnant state, the first trimester of pregnancy is characterized by systemic adaptation of the mother. The extent to which these adaptive processes are reflected in the maternal blood metabolome is not well characterized.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31726468 PMCID: PMC6855901 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the study population.
| Pregnant (n = 50) | Non-pregnant (n = 21) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 52% | <4 × 10−5 | |
| 23 [21–26] | 29 [24–32] | <0.002 | |
| 20% | 4% | <0.16 | |
| 12w4d [11w1d– 14w5d] | n/a | n/a |
Values are given as % of total or as median [interquartile range]. Note that interquartile range differs from the full range in the study.
a Fisher’s exact test
b Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U test
Fig 1Principal component analysis of metabolic profiles of pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Principal components (PC1, PC2) are derived from abundance of 637 metabolites measured in plasma samples of 50 pregnant and 21 non-pregnant women. The percentage of the variance explained by each principal component is shown in parentheses.
Fig 2Boxplots of small-molecule abundance as a function of pregnancy status.
The distribution of metabolites with increased (A) or decreased (B) abundance are shown using boxplots; the thick lines represent the medians, the boxes represent inter-quartile ranges, and the whiskers extend to the minimum/maximum values if not more than 1.5 times the interquartile range. EPA = eicosapentaenoate; γGluVal = γ-glutamyl valine; γGluGlu = γ-glutamyl glutamate; HisAla = histidylalanine; 5PBAS = 5α-pregnan-3β,20α-diol monosulfate; PLGPI = palmitoyl-linoleoyl-glycerophosphoinositol; CysGly, oxidized = glycine-cysteine-(SS)-cysteine-glycine.
Differences among the most-consistent metabolites abundance in pregnancy.
| Metabolite | Fold-change in Pregnancy | FDR |
|---|---|---|
| 5-oxoproline | 0.40 | 3.6 × 10−8 |
| eicosapentaenoate (EPA) | 0.23 | 3.6 × 10−8 |
| gamma-glutamylvaline [ | 0.41 | 3.6 × 10−8 |
| maleate (cis-Butenedioate) [ | 0.43 | 3.6 × 10−8 |
| gamma-glutamylglutamate [ | 0.21 | 8.1 × 10−8 |
| histidylalanine[ | <0.01 | 8.1 × 10−8 |
| 5α-pregnan-3β,20α-diol monosulfate | 30 | 6.4 × 10−7 |
| cysteinyl glycine, oxidized | 5.8 | 1.6 × 10−7 |
| allopregnanolone and pregnanolone sulfate[ | 11 | 2.1 × 10−7 |
| palmitoyl-linoleoyl-glycerophosphoinositol[ | 1.8 | 1.6 × 10−6 |
| cysteine s-sulfate[ | 2.1 | 1.8 × 10−6 |
| acetoacetate | 2.7 | 5.6 × 10−6 |
Values are shown as fold change: ratio of median total ion count in pregnant to non-pregnant controls, followed by FDR for the corresponding Wilcoxon test. For adjusted values, refer to S1 Table. References are bolded when the reference indicates a previous link to obstetric outcome; other findings are believed to be novel, but a single promising reference to metabolomics and underlying physiology is provided.
Pathways perturbed in pregnancy.
| Pathway | Significant metabolites/ Detected metabolites | Fisher’s test p-value (FDR) | Example metabolite |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 / 14 | 0.0002 (0.006) | caffeine | |
| 30 / 44 | 0.0006 (0.012) | pregnanolone sulfate | |
| 22 / 33 | 0.0053 (0.056) | palmitoyl-linoleoyl-glycerophosphoinositol* | |
| 10 / 12 | 0.0057 (0.056) | histidylalanine | |
| 6 / 6 | 0.0067 (0.056) | bradykinin |
Only the five significantly enriched (FDR < 0.1) pathways are shown.
aSee Table 2.
bAll 6 polypeptides detected in this study were bradykinin or derivatives thereof.
Fig 3Metabolites associated with gestational age.
Each panel shows metabolite abundance (on the vertical axis) vs. gestational age in weeks (on the horizontal axis). Non-pregnant women are shown to the left of gestational age 0 on the horizontal axis, with dither added so that points can be distinguished. Each point corresponds to one sample; linear regression lines are shown for pregnant women, and median values are shown for non-pregnant women.