Literature DB >> 31725720

Development and validation of rapid environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods for bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii).

Anish A Kirtane1, Maxwell L Wilder1, Hyatt C Green1.   

Abstract

Bog turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) for wildlife action plans in every state it occurs and multi-state efforts are underway to better characterize extant populations and prioritize restoration efforts. However, traditional sampling methods can be ineffective due to the turtle's wetland habitat, small size, and burrowing nature. Molecular methods, such as qPCR, provide the ability to overcome this challenge by effectively quantifying minute amounts of turtle DNA left behind in its environment (eDNA). Developing such methods for bog turtles has proved difficult partly because of the high sequence similarity between bog turtles and closely-related, cohabitating species, most often wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta). Additionally, substrates containing bog turtle eDNA are often rich in organics or other substances that frequently inhibit both DNA extraction and qPCR amplification. Here, we describe the development and validation of a qPCR assay, BT3, targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene that correctly identifies bog turtles with 100% specificity and sensitivity when tested on 201 blood samples collected from six species over a wide geographic range. We also developed a full-process internal control employing a genetically modified strain of Caenorhabditis elegans to improve DNA extraction methods, limit false negative results due to qPCR inhibition, and measure total DNA recovery from each sample. Using the internal control, we found that DNA recovery varied by over an order of magnitude between samples and likely explains the lack of bog turtle detection in some cases. Methods presented herein are highly-specific and may offer a more cost effective, non-invasive tool to supplement bog turtle population assessments in the Eastern United States. Poor or differential DNA recovery, which remains unmeasured in the vast majority of eDNA studies, significantly reduced the ability to detect bog turtle in their natural environment.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31725720     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Using eDNA techniques to find the endangered big-headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum).

Authors:  Ivan P Y Lam; Yik-Hei Sung; Jonathan J Fong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Environmental DNA analysis confirms extant populations of the cryptic Irwin's turtle within its historical range.

Authors:  Cecilia Villacorta-Rath; Thomas Espinoza; Bernie Cockayne; Jason Schaffer; Damien Burrows
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 3.  A review of applications of environmental DNA for reptile conservation and management.

Authors:  Bethany Nordstrom; Nicola Mitchell; Margaret Byrne; Simon Jarman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Landscape, Water Quality, and Weather Factors Associated With an Increased Likelihood of Foodborne Pathogen Contamination of New York Streams Used to Source Water for Produce Production.

Authors:  Daniel Weller; Alexandra Belias; Hyatt Green; Sherry Roof; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Front Sustain Food Syst       Date:  2020-02-06

5.  Co-quantification of crAssphage increases confidence in wastewater-based epidemiology for SARS-CoV-2 in low prevalence areas.

Authors:  Maxwell L Wilder; Frank Middleton; David A Larsen; Qian Du; Ariana Fenty; Teng Zeng; Tabassum Insaf; Pruthvi Kilaru; Mary Collins; Brittany Kmush; Hyatt C Green
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2021-04-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.