Literature DB >> 31724876

Guidance on the use of MRI for treatment planning in radiotherapy clinical trials.

Robert I Johnstone1, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano2, Andriana Michaelidou3, Tony Greener1, Elizabeth Miles4, David Eaton1,4, Christopher Thomas1,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to propose meaningful guidance covering the technical and safety issues involved when designing or conducting radiotherapy clinical trials that use MRI for treatment planning. The complexity of imaging requirements will depend on the trial aims, design and MRI methods used.The use of MRI within the RT pathway is becoming more prevalent and clinically appropriate as access to MRI increases, treatment planning systems become more versatile and potential indications for MRI-planning in RT are documented. Novel MRI-planning opportunities are often initiated and validated within clinical trials.The guidance in this document is intended to assist researchers designing RT clinical trials involving MRI, so that they may provide sufficient information about the appropriate methods to be used for image acquisition, post-processing and quality assurance such that participating sites complete MRI to consistent standards. It has been produced in collaboration with the National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA).As the use of MRI in RT is developed, it is highly recommended for researchers writing clinical trial protocols to include imaging guidance as part of their clinical trial documentation covering the trial-specific requirements for MRI procedures. Many of the considerations and recommendations in this guidance may well apply to MR-guided treatment machines, where clinical trials will be crucial. Similarly, many of these recommendations will apply to the general use of MRI in RT, outside of clinical trials.This document contains a large number of recommendations, not all of which will be relevant to any particular trial. Designers of RT clinical trials must therefore take this into account. They must also use their own judgement as to the appropriate compromise between accessibility of the trial and its technical rigour.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31724876      PMCID: PMC6948090          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Elizabeth K Butker; Indra J Das; M Saiful Huq; Leh-Nien Dick Loo; Bill J Salter; Cynthia H McCollough; Jacob Van Dyk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of manual and automatic section positioning of brain MR images.

Authors:  Thomas Benner; Jonathan J Wisco; André J W van der Kouwe; Bruce Fischl; Mark G Vangel; Fred H Hochberg; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  MRI integration into treatment planning of head and neck tumors: Can patient immobilization be avoided?

Authors:  Valerio Fortunati; René F Verhaart; Gerda M Verduijn; Aad van der Lugt; Francesco Angeloni; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland; Margarethus M Paulides; Theo van Walsum
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 4.  The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided.

Authors:  Julianne M Pollard; Zhifei Wen; Ramaswamy Sadagopan; Jihong Wang; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Hanvey; A H Sadozye; M McJury; M Glegg; J Foster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Gary P Liney; Marinus A Moerland
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 7.  Systematic Review of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methodologies for Use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Emily Johnstone; Jonathan J Wyatt; Ann M Henry; Susan C Short; David Sebag-Montefiore; Louise Murray; Charles G Kelly; Hazel M McCallum; Richard Speight
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations.

Authors:  Vikas Gulani; Fernando Calamante; Frank G Shellock; Emanuel Kanal; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 9.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Susan M Chang; Martin J Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; David R Macdonald; Eudocia Q Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The influence of MRI scan position on patients with oropharyngeal cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy.

Authors:  Scott Hanvey; Mark McJury; Lye Mun Tho; Martin Glegg; Maureen Thomson; Derek Grose; Allan James; Mohammed Rizwanullah; Claire Paterson; John Foster
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  1 in total

1.  Synthetic MRI for Radiotherapy Planning for Brain and Prostate Cancers: Phantom Validation and Patient Evaluation.

Authors:  Pierrick Gouel; Sebastien Hapdey; Arthur Dumouchel; Isabelle Gardin; Eva Torfeh; Pauline Hinault; Pierre Vera; Sebastien Thureau; David Gensanne
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.