| Literature DB >> 31724332 |
Peter H T Tran1,2,3, Tanja Skrba1,2,3, Elisabeth Wondimu1, Giuseppina Galatioto1, René Brüggebusch Svensson2,3,4, Annesofie T Olesen2,3, Abigail L Mackey2,3,5, S Peter Magnusson4, Francesco Ramirez1, Michael Kjaer2,3.
Abstract
Fibrillin-1 mutations cause pathological changes in connective tissue that constitute the complex phenotype of Marfan syndrome. In this study, we used fibrillin-1 hypomorphic and haploinsufficient mice (Fbn1mgr/mgR and Fbn1+/- mice, respectively) to investigate the impact of fibrillin-1 deficiency alone or in combination with regular physical activity on tendon tissue morphology and mechanical properties. Morphological and biomechanical analyses revealed that Fbn1mgr/mgR but not Fbn1+/- mice displayed smaller tendons with physical properties that were unremarkable when normalized to tendon size. Fbn1mgR/mgR mice (n = 43) Fbn1+/- mice (n = 27) and wild-type mice (WT, n = 25) were randomly assigned to either control cage conditions (n = 54) or to a running on a running wheel for 4 weeks (n = 41). Both fibrillin-1-deficient mice ran voluntarily on the running wheel in a manner similar to WT mice (3-4 km/24 h). Regular exercise did not mitigate aneurysm progression in Fbn1mgR/mgR mice (P < 0.05) as evidenced by unmodified median survival. In spite of the smaller size, tendons of fibrillin-1-deficient mice subjected to regular exercise showed no evidence of overt histopathological changes or tissue overload. We therefore concluded that lack of optimal fibrillin-1 synthesis leads to a down regulation of integrated tendon formation, rather than to a loss of tendon quality, which also implies that fibrillin-1 deficiency in combination with exercise is not a suitable animal model for studying the development of tendon overuse (tendinopathy).Entities:
Keywords: Biomechanics; Exercise; Marfan; Survival; Tendinopathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31724332 PMCID: PMC6854111 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Running data over 30 days for mice on running‐wheel.
| Experimental groups | Number of mice |
Distance (km) Mean ± SE |
Average velocity (m/sec) Mean ± SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild‐type | 11 | 116 ± 22 | 0.20 ± 0.02 |
| Less‐severe MFS | 14 | 102 ± 15 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
| More‐severe MFS | 14 | 89 ± 13 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
Distance (km) was calculated as total distance during the 30‐day period. Average velocity (m/s) is a measured distance for each running‐bout that resulted in a rotation of the wheel more than 45° during 1 sec divided by time until it no longer exceeded the threshold of 45° per second. SE, standard error of mean.
Figure 130‐day survival‐curves for all three genotypes. (A) wild‐type mice. (B) Less‐severe MFS mice. (C) More‐severe MFS mice.( D) All mice genotypes. There was no difference in survival between wheel running‐group and controls in any of the groups. More‐severe MFS mice had a median survival of 10 weeks regardless of wheel running and therefore showed significantly lower survival‐rate when compared to wild‐type. * P<0.05.
Figure 2Tendon dimensions of mice in both wheel‐running and control group. (A) Diameter (mm). (B) Thickness (mm). (C) Cross‐sectional area (CSA, mm2). Diameter, thickness, and cross‐sectional are of more‐severe MFS mice were significant less than that in wild‐type. There was no significant difference of less‐severe MFS mice when compared to other genotypes regardless of groups. * P<0.05. In control group: NWild‐type = 14, NLess‐severe = 12, and NMore‐severe = 9. In wheel‐running‐group: NWild‐type = 11, NLess‐severe = 11, and NMore‐severe = 10.
Figure 3Mechanical data from genotypes of control and wheel‐running group. (A) Maximal force (N). (B) Maximal stiffness (N/mm). (C) Maximal modulus (MPa). (D) Hysteresis (KJ/m3). More‐severe mice had significantly lower max force and max stiffness when compared to wild‐type. * P<0.05. In control group: NWild‐type = 13, NLess‐severe = 12, and NMore‐severe = 9. In wheel‐running group: NWild‐type = 11, NLess‐severe = 11, and NMore‐severe = 11.
Figure 4Results from Picrosirius staining of genotypes in control and wheel running‐group. ( Left panel image: example image). (A) Overall green color (%). (B) Overall collagen alignment (%). (C) Green color intensity (%). (D) Collagen alignment (%). Left panel image: example image. In control group: NWild‐type = 8, NLess‐severe = 4, and NMore‐severe = 3. In wheel‐running group: NWild‐type = 3, NLess‐severe = 7, and NMore‐severe = 5.