Jonas S Jutzi1,2,3, Maria Kleppe4,5,6, Jennifer Dias7, Hans Felix Staehle1, Kaitlyn Shank4, Julie Teruya-Feldstein8, Sudheer Madan Mohan Gambheer1, Christine Dierks1, Hugh Y Rienhoff7, Ross L Levine4,5,6,9, Heike L Pahl1,2. 1. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Center for Tumor Biology, Freiburg, Germany. 2. Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 4. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Center for Epigenetics Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Imago BioSciences, San Francisco, CA, USA. 8. Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 9. Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
Despite recent advances, the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are attended by considerable morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib manage symptoms but do not substantially change the natural history of the disease. In this report, we show the effects of IMG-7289, an irreversible inhibitor of the epigenetically active lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) in mouse models of MPN. Once-daily treatment with IMG-7289 normalized or improved blood cell counts, reduced spleen volumes, restored normal splenic architecture, and reduced bone marrow fibrosis. Most importantly, LSD1 inhibition lowered mutant allele burden and improved survival. IMG-7289 selectively inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of JAK2 V617F cells by concomitantly increasing expression and methylation of p53, and, independently, the pro-apoptotic factor PUMA and by decreasing the levels of its antiapoptotic antagonist BCLXL. These data provide a molecular understanding of the disease-modifying activity of the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289 that is currently undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with high-risk myelofibrosis. Moreover, low doses of IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib synergize in normalizing the MPN phenotype in mice, offering a rationale for investigating combination therapy.
Despite recent advances, the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are attended by considerable morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib manage symptoms but do not substantially change the natural history of the disease. In this report, we show the effects of IMG-7289, an irreversible inhibitor of the epigenetically active lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) in mouse models of MPN. Once-daily treatment with IMG-7289 normalized or improved blood cell counts, reduced spleen volumes, restored normal splenic architecture, and reduced bone marrow fibrosis. Most importantly, LSD1 inhibition lowered mutant allele burden and improved survival. IMG-7289 selectively inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of JAK2 V617F cells by concomitantly increasing expression and methylation of p53, and, independently, the pro-apoptotic factor PUMA and by decreasing the levels of its antiapoptotic antagonist BCLXL. These data provide a molecular understanding of the disease-modifying activity of the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289 that is currently undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with high-risk myelofibrosis. Moreover, low doses of IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib synergize in normalizing the MPN phenotype in mice, offering a rationale for investigating combination therapy.
Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) comprise a group of clonal malignant hematological diseases that includes essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis. At various rates, ET and PV patients can develop myelofibrosis (MF) and all 3 MPNs can transform to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), events associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. To date, bone marrow (BM) transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapy for MPNpatients.The discovery of mutations in JAK2, MPL, and CALR, all of which activate the STAT signaling pathways, led to the development of the first targeted therapy for MPN, the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, approved for the treatment of MF and hydroxyurea-resistant PV. Ruxolitinib improves constitutional symptoms and reduces spleen volumes. As ruxolitinib proved equally effective in patients with wt JAK2, it has been proposed that it exerts its effect in part by lowering inflammatory cytokine levels.[1,2] Importantly, ruxolitinib only modestly reduces the mutant JAK2 allele burden in a minority of patients. Likewise, disease progression is slowed only in some patients.[3-7] Recently, Newberry et al reported that 22/63 (36%) of MF patients acquired new mutations while on ruxolitinib therapy, 15/22 (68%) of these in ASXL1, which have been associated with an inferior survival.[8,9] The modest effects on clinical outcomes and potential selection of a more aggressive clone underscore the need for more effective therapies, especially those that impact the underlying malignancy by selectively reducing the malignant population.LSD1 modifies chromatin by removing mono- and dimethyl groups from histone H3 with the effect of epigenetically regulating gene transcription. Enzyme activity is essential for steady-state hematopoiesis as genetic knockdown or pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 inhibits thrombopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and granulopoiesis.[10,11] The hematologic effects of LSD1 inhibition (LSD1i) are fully reversible and chronic treatment is not associated with impairment of long-term BM function (Sprussel et al[10] and Imago BioSciences, unpublished).The hematopoietic effects of LSD1i suggest that this may constitute a therapeutic option in MPN. Several clinical findings support this hypothesis. First, LSD1 is overexpressed in patients with MPN and AML.[12] Second, LSD1 is necessary for sustaining the self-renewal potential of leukemic stem cells as its depletion by RNAi attenuated MLL-AF9-driven leukemia.[13,14] Finally, LSD1i led to stem cell reprogramming resulting in myeloid differentiation and a reduction of AML cell engraftment, an effect enhanced by the addition of all-trans retinoic acid.[14] Together these observations suggest that LSD1i might be successful in safely controlling the proliferative features of MPNs and potentially reducing the mutant clone burden.In this report, we investigate the consequences of LSD1i in mouse models of MPN. We provide evidence that many cardinal MPN features—erythrocytosis, leukocytosis, thrombocythemia, hepatosplenomegaly, and elevated inflammatory cytokines—can be significantly improved by oral treatment with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289. We show that the mutant allele frequency is reduced and overall survival improved with this treatment regimen. Moreover, LSD1i synergized with JAK1/2 inhibition in ameliorating the MPN phenotype. Finally, we describe the mechanism by which LSD1i achieves these effects. IMG-7289 is currently undergoing clinical evaluation in both AML and MF (NCT02842827 and NCT03136185).
Results
Mice carrying the Jak2 mutation as an inducible, floxed allele 3’ to the endogenous Jak2 locus (L2-strain[15]) were crossed with mice expressing the Cre recombinase under control of the interferon-inducible Mx1 promoter to generate a novel Jak2mouse model. Expression of Cre recombinase in F1Mx1cre-Jak2mice (Mx-Jak2) leads to excision of the wild type (WT) Jak2 allele and expression of the mutant Jak2 allele encoding the constitutively activated Jak2. Due to the leakiness of the Mx1 promoter,[16]Mx1cre-Jak2mice develop an MPN phenotype without induction of Mx1 by poly(I:C) injections.We chose the Mx1 promoter as it responds to pro-inflammatory stimuli. Evidence is mounting that chronic inflammation contributes both to the initiation and to the maintenance of MPN.[17,18] A substantial proportion of the therapeutic effect of ruxolitinib is thought to derive from the reduction in inflammatory cytokine levels, hence its effect on patients expressing wt JAK2.[1,19] In our model, the expression of Jak2V617F, by inducing inflammation, will perpetuate and exacerbate disease status, similar to the current model implicating inflammation in promoting disease progression in MPNpatients.By the age of 6 weeks, Mx-Jak2mice display mild erythrocytosis with reticulocytosis, thrombocytosis and mild leukocytosis (Fig. 1, data at day 0). The MPN progresses over time in untreated animals: by day 56, the mean white blood cell (WBC) counts exceeded 50,000 cells/μL, neutrophilia increased 4-fold, platelet counts rose above 3000 × 106 /μL, and the hematocrit reached 70%, despite a relatively low Jak2 allele burden, determined by qPCR of peripheral blood (3–15%, Fig. S1A, Supplemental Digital Content). Concomitant presence of WT and mutant cells, characteristic of virtually all MPNpatients, allows the assessment of a possible selective effect of LSD1i.
Figure 1
Hematological parameters of mice treated with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289. Peripheral blood was obtained by retrobulbar puncture and analyzed on an Advia 120 system at the indicated time points (n = 8 mice per group). Mean and standard error of mean are shown. (A) White blood cell (WBC) count, (B) platelet counts, (C) absolute neutrophil count (ANC), (D) absolute monocyte count, (E) hematocrit (HCT), and (F) absolute reticulocyte count. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 versus vehicle-treated mice.
Hematological parameters of mice treated with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289. Peripheral blood was obtained by retrobulbar puncture and analyzed on an Advia 120 system at the indicated time points (n = 8 mice per group). Mean and standard error of mean are shown. (A) White blood cell (WBC) count, (B) platelet counts, (C) absolute neutrophil count (ANC), (D) absolute monocyte count, (E) hematocrit (HCT), and (F) absolute reticulocyte count. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 versus vehicle-treated mice.Cohorts consisting of 8 mice equal in age, sex, and blood counts were dosed once daily with either IMG-7289 (45 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle for 56 days. Complete blood counts (CBC) were assessed at 14-day intervals. Treatment with IMG-7289 normalized neutrophil count within 14 days and the WBC count, hematocrit, reticulocytosis, and monocytosis were also significantly reduced over the course of treatment compared to controls (Fig. 1) albeit remaining slightly above normal. LSD1 activity is required for full megakaryocyte maturation and platelet production[10,11] and the effect of LSD1i on platelet production is dose dependent (Imago, unpublished). At the chosen dose of 45 mg/kg per d of IMG-7289, platelet counts were dramatically decreased (Fig. 1B). Nonetheless, treated mice did not exhibit spontaneous bleeding nor was there any evidence of hemorrhage at autopsy (data not shown).Splenomegaly secondary to extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH) is a prominent feature of MPN that contributes to poor quality of life. In this Mx-Jak2 model of MPN, mice developed severe splenomegaly (up to 10-fold increase in spleen weight). Splenic architecture was completely destroyed, eliminating demarcation of the white and red pulp (Fig. 2A, left). IMG-7289 treatment significantly reduced splenomegaly (Fig. 2B) with a few treated mice normalizing their spleen weight. Remarkably, the 56-day course led to partial restoration of lymph follicles and spleen architecture by histological examination (Fig. 2A, right).
Figure 2
Effect of LSD1 inhibition on inflammation, spleen size, allele burden, and fibrosis. (A) Representative presentation of vehicle (left) and IMG-7289-treated (right) spleen. Top bars: 500 μm; bottom: higher magnification of the same spleens, bars: 200 μm H&E staining of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded spleen. (B) Spleen weight of vehicle or IMG-7289 treated Jak2V617F mice. n = 7 to 8 per group, as indicated. (C) Representative presentation of 2 vehicle (left) and 2 IMG-98-treated (right) bone marrows. Staining for reticulin fibers using silver impregnation. Bars: 50 μm. (D) Jak2 mutant allelic burden in vehicle- and IMG-7289-treated peripheral blood cells, obtained at days 14 and 56 of treatment, respectively (top), as well as treated splenic cells (bottom). Mean and standard error of mean are shown. (E) Percentage of GFP positive (Jak2) donor peripheral blood cells of bone marrow transplanted mice. (F) Cxcl5 levels in plasma samples obtained at days 14 and 56 of treatment measured by ELISA. (G) RNA was isolated from BM of vehicle- and IMG-7289-treated mice and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR analysis for Nfe2 and ß2-microglobulin as a control. Relative RNA expression was determined by −ΔΔCT and expression of vehicle-treated BM was set to 1.0. (D–F) n = 4 to 8, as indicated. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. BM = bone marrow.
Effect of LSD1 inhibition on inflammation, spleen size, allele burden, and fibrosis. (A) Representative presentation of vehicle (left) and IMG-7289-treated (right) spleen. Top bars: 500 μm; bottom: higher magnification of the same spleens, bars: 200 μm H&E staining of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded spleen. (B) Spleen weight of vehicle or IMG-7289 treated Jak2V617F mice. n = 7 to 8 per group, as indicated. (C) Representative presentation of 2 vehicle (left) and 2 IMG-98-treated (right) bone marrows. Staining for reticulin fibers using silver impregnation. Bars: 50 μm. (D) Jak2 mutant allelic burden in vehicle- and IMG-7289-treated peripheral blood cells, obtained at days 14 and 56 of treatment, respectively (top), as well as treated splenic cells (bottom). Mean and standard error of mean are shown. (E) Percentage of GFP positive (Jak2) donor peripheral blood cells of bone marrow transplanted mice. (F) Cxcl5 levels in plasma samples obtained at days 14 and 56 of treatment measured by ELISA. (G) RNA was isolated from BM of vehicle- and IMG-7289-treated mice and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR analysis for Nfe2 and ß2-microglobulin as a control. Relative RNA expression was determined by −ΔΔCT and expression of vehicle-treated BM was set to 1.0. (D–F) n = 4 to 8, as indicated. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. BM = bone marrow.Another frequent finding in MPNpatients is BM fibrosis presenting either as primary MF or developing secondarily during MPN disease progression. The Mx-Jak2mouse model, however, does not develop appreciable fibrosis before mice become moribund. We therefore employed a second well-characterized mouse model of MPN in which the mutant thrombopoietin receptor, MPL, is transduced into hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.[20] In contrast to the PV-like disease observed in the Jak2mouse model, MPL-diseased mice develop an ET/MF-like disease with fulminant BM fibrosis. Treatment of MPLmice with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-98, a molecule with an identical pharmacophore to IMG-7289, led to marked reduction in BM reticulin fibrosis after 4 weeks of treatment (Fig. 2C). Similar to the response in Mx-Jak2 animals, LSD1i partially restored splenic architecture and diminished EMH in the liver (Fig. S1B-I, Supplemental Digital Content). These data in 2 distinct models of MPN show that LSD1i results in significant improvement in the most important clinical signs and symptoms of MPNs.The only Food and Drug Administration approved therapy for MPN is the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. While this agent can bring elevated hematologic parameters into the normal range and reduce splenomegaly in MPNpatients, it has limited disease-modifying activity including only modest reduction of the JAK2 allele burden.[3-7] Ruxolitinib is not selective for the mutant kinase and thus does not selectively target JAK2-expressing cells. Given that LSD1 selectively inhibits the self-renewal of leukemia initiating cells,[13] we asked whether IMG-7289 had a differential effect on mutant versus WT cells. As our mouse model contains both WT and Mx-Jak2 cells, we used qPCR to determine the Jak2 allele burden at day 14 and after 56 days of IMG-7289 treatment. Figure 2D shows that in vehicle-treated mice, the Jak2 allele burden increases over 56 days consistent with published reports that the Jak2 mutation confers a selective growth advantage to hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells causing expansion of the mutant cell population.[15] Conversely, LSD1i significantly decreased the Jak2 allele burden in both peripheral blood and spleen cells (Fig. 2D), strongly suggesting that Jak2 cells are more sensitive to LSD1i than their WT counterparts.Our mouse model is driven by Mx1-Cre mediated expression of the JakV617F allele. Since the Mx1 promoter is induced by inflammatory stimuli, we were concerned that LSD1i mediated suppression of inflammation rather than specific inhibition of Jak2 expressing cells was responsible for the observed reduction in allele burden. To investigate this possibility, we employed a different Jak2 model, mice transplanted with BM retrovirally transduced to express both GFP and Jak2.[21,22] Mice with established disease were treated for 14 consecutive days with 45 mg/kg IMG-7289. The proportion of GFP-positive donor cells in the peripheral blood decreased significantly over this short period of time (Fig. 2E), demonstrating the LSD1i reduced the burden of the neoplastic clone. These data offer the possibility of a therapeutic window in which the remaining, normal hematopoietic cells are spared during LSD1i therapy in MPNpatients.Serum levels of several inflammatory cytokines are increased in MPNpatients including interleukin 8 (IL8), the most consistently elevated cytokine in MF.[23] In MF patients, IL8 levels constitute an independent prognostic indicator, correlating inversely with leukemia-free survival. The effect of IMG-7289 on serum levels of Cxcl5, a murine ortholog of IL8 made in megakaryocytes, was determined. LSD1i reduced Cxcl5 levels by 60% after 14 days of treatment and by more than 95% after 56 days of treatment compared to vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 2F). LSD1i had a similar effect of reducing serum Cxcl5 in the MPLmouse model (Fig. S1L, Supplemental Digital Content).The mechanism by which LSD1 depletion causes a decrease in platelet production is only incompletely understood but the recruitment of LSD1 to chromatin by the transcription factor GFI1b is essential for megakaryocyte development and function.[24] Another transcription factor, Nfe2, is also essential for thrombopoiesis in mice; Nfe2 null mice show severe thrombocytopenia at birth and die perinatally from hemorrhage.[25] Conversely, overexpression of Nfe2 in results in thrombocythemia.[26,27] Nfe2 is also required for other megakaryocytic functions including the production of IL8.[28] NFE2 is overexpressed in a majority of MPNpatients.[29,30] We therefore determined the effects of LSD1i on Nfe2 mRNA expression in BM cells of IMG-7289-treated mice. Nfe2 levels were significantly reduced compared to untreated animals (Figs. 2G and S1K, Supplemental Digital Content). This effect was not due to a reduction in the number of megakaryocytes or megakaryocyte progenitors (MEPs) (Figs. 2A and3H). These data link the effects of LSD1i to altered expression of a transcription factor critical to megakaryocytic function including thrombopoiesis and cytokine production.Effect of LSD1 inhibition on lineage commitment and hematopoietic stem and progenitor populations in mice. (A–H) BM cells were stained with antibodies against a cocktail of lineage markers as well as against c-kit, Sca-1, CD34, Fc-γR, and Flt3/Flk2. All given subpopulations, defined as previously described,[51,52,55] are depicted as a percentage of total BM cells. (A) Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+ (LSK) cells. (B) Long-term hematopoietic stem cell (LT-HSC: LSK, CD34neg, FLK2/FLT3neg). (C) Short-term hematopoietic stem cell (ST-HSC: LSK, CD34int, FLK2/FLT3neg). (D) Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+, CD135−, CD90.1−, CD34lo cells. (E) Multipotent progenitor (MPP). (F) Common myeloid progenitor (CMP). (G) Granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP). (H) Megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitor (MEP). (A–H) n = 6 to 7 per group, as indicated. Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice. BM = bone marrow.FACS analysis of stem and progenitor compartments in the BM revealed an increase in the Lin−/Sca+/Kit+ (LSK) compartment following IMG-7289 treatment (Fig. 3A). This was due to an expansion of the CD135− CD90.1− CD34lo LSK-subpopulation (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, all other stem and progenitor cell compartments were either not significantly increased (long-term hematopoietic stem cell [LT-HSC], Fig. 3B) or decreased (short-term HSCs [ST-HSCs], multipotent progenitors [MPPs], common myeloid progenitors, granulocyte-macrophage progenitors, and MEPs [Fig. 3C, E–I]). These data are in contrast to the observation that shRNA-mediated partial depletion of LSD1 in healthy mice caused a dramatic increase in several stem and progenitor compartments.[10] Pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 did not cause a significant expansion of immature cells in the BM of MPNmice.
Figure 3
Effect of LSD1 inhibition on lineage commitment and hematopoietic stem and progenitor populations in mice. (A–H) BM cells were stained with antibodies against a cocktail of lineage markers as well as against c-kit, Sca-1, CD34, Fc-γR, and Flt3/Flk2. All given subpopulations, defined as previously described,[51,52,55] are depicted as a percentage of total BM cells. (A) Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+ (LSK) cells. (B) Long-term hematopoietic stem cell (LT-HSC: LSK, CD34neg, FLK2/FLT3neg). (C) Short-term hematopoietic stem cell (ST-HSC: LSK, CD34int, FLK2/FLT3neg). (D) Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+, CD135−, CD90.1−, CD34lo cells. (E) Multipotent progenitor (MPP). (F) Common myeloid progenitor (CMP). (G) Granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP). (H) Megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitor (MEP). (A–H) n = 6 to 7 per group, as indicated. Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice. BM = bone marrow.
The data presented in Figure 1 show that IMG-7289 treatment ameliorates and normalizes CBCs in young mice displaying the full MPN phenotype. This therapeutic strategy approximates treating MPNpatients at diagnosis or early during their disease course. However, many patients, especially ET and PV patients, can initially be managed with little or no medical intervention. In order to model the treatment of MPNpatients with longer disease duration, we asked whether overall survival in mice with more advanced disease could be improved with LSD1i. Mx-Jak2 animals at 13 weeks of age display advanced disease and survive only for a median of 2 to 5 weeks. Treatment beginning at week 13 with IMG-7289 showed a striking improvement in survival. While none of the vehicle-treated mice survived the duration of the study, dying of spontaneous thoracic or abdominal hemorrhage, no mouse receiving daily IMG-7289 succumbed to this ET/PV phenotype during the 75-day treatment period (P < 0.01, Fig. 4A).
Figure 4
LSD1 inhibition with IMG-7289 enhances survival, induces apoptosis via BCLXL and PUMA in a TP53-dependent manner, and leads to cell cycle arrest. (A) Overall survival of Jak2V617F mice treated with IMG-7289 in an advanced stage of disease. Statistical analysis was conducted using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B–F) SET-2 cells, treated either with DMSO or 50 nM, 100 nM, and 1 μM IMG-7289, respectively. n = 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (B) Representative FACS plots of SET-2 cells stained for Annexin V/PI, after 96 hours of treatment. (C + D) Quantification of apoptosis shown in (B) detected by either Annexin V (C) or Annexin V and PI staining (D). (E) Representative western blot showing BCLXL protein levels (top) and actin as loading control (bottom) of treated SET-2 cells. (F) Quantification of BCLXL protein levels shown in (E). (G) Representative western blot showing protein levels of TP53 (top) and TP53 K370me2 (middle) and actin as loading control (bottom) in treated SET-2 cells. (H) Quantification of TP53 and TP53 K370me2 (middle) protein levels, shown in (G). (I) Representative western blot showing PUMA protein levels (top) and actin as loading control (bottom) of treated HEK293 cells. (K) Quantification of apoptosis in cocultures of Baf/3 wild type and Baf/3 Jak2 cells, treated with IMG-7289 or a DMSO control, detected with FACS by Annexin V staining. n = 2 independent experiments (each in duplicate). (L) Hoechst-based cell cycle analysis of treated SET-2 cells. n = 2 independent experiments (each in triplicate). (C, D, F, H, I, K) Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
LSD1 inhibition with IMG-7289 enhances survival, induces apoptosis via BCLXL and PUMA in a TP53-dependent manner, and leads to cell cycle arrest. (A) Overall survival of Jak2V617F mice treated with IMG-7289 in an advanced stage of disease. Statistical analysis was conducted using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (B–F) SET-2 cells, treated either with DMSO or 50 nM, 100 nM, and 1 μM IMG-7289, respectively. n = 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (B) Representative FACS plots of SET-2 cells stained for Annexin V/PI, after 96 hours of treatment. (C + D) Quantification of apoptosis shown in (B) detected by either Annexin V (C) or Annexin V and PI staining (D). (E) Representative western blot showing BCLXL protein levels (top) and actin as loading control (bottom) of treated SET-2 cells. (F) Quantification of BCLXL protein levels shown in (E). (G) Representative western blot showing protein levels of TP53 (top) and TP53 K370me2 (middle) and actin as loading control (bottom) in treated SET-2 cells. (H) Quantification of TP53 and TP53 K370me2 (middle) protein levels, shown in (G). (I) Representative western blot showing PUMA protein levels (top) and actin as loading control (bottom) of treated HEK293 cells. (K) Quantification of apoptosis in cocultures of Baf/3 wild type and Baf/3 Jak2 cells, treated with IMG-7289 or a DMSO control, detected with FACS by Annexin V staining. n = 2 independent experiments (each in duplicate). (L) Hoechst-based cell cycle analysis of treated SET-2 cells. n = 2 independent experiments (each in triplicate). (C, D, F, H, I, K) Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.Reduction of the Jak2 allele burden and the accompanying increase in survival can be explained either by a decrease in proliferation of Jak2 cells, or by an increase in apoptosis, or both. We therefore determined the effect of IMG-7289 on apoptosis in SET-2 cells, a cell line derived from a Jak2patient with post-ET-AML.[31] LSD1i caused a dose-dependent increase in apoptosis as indicated by Annexin V/PI staining (Fig. 4B–D). This was accompanied by a highly significant decrease in expression of the antiapoptotic protein BCLXL (Fig. 4E and F). BCLXL has previously been shown to be overexpressed in primary erythroid cells from patients with PV.[32] Increased BCLXL expression may contribute to EPO-independent growth manifested by the formation of “EPO-independent colonies, EECs,” which are pathognomonic for this disease.[32] Normalization of BCLXL levels by LSD1i may thus constitute 1 mechanism by which this therapy selectively targets the malignant clone.LSD1 has been demonstrated to demethylate proteins other than histones, thereby modulating their activity.[33] Activity of the TP53 protein is repressed by LSD1-mediated demethylation of lysine 370. Methylated TP53 (TP53 K370me2) is significantly more active in inducing apoptosis than unmethylated TP53.[34] We therefore investigated whether IMG-7289 treatment affects TP53K370 methylation as well as total TP53 expression. LSD1i caused both a significant increase in the amount of dimethylated TP53 and in the total TP53 protein level (Fig. 4G and H).TP53 regulates both the expression of BCLXL as well as of its pro-apoptotic antagonist p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA).[35-37] However, the SET-2 cells used carry a homozygous p53 mutation, R248W.[38] While this mutation confers a neomorphic function[39] rather than a mere loss of function, its potential to activate p53 target genes may be lost. Nonetheless, in SET-2 cells, IMG-7289 treatment decreased levels of the antiapoptotic protein BCLXL and increased levels of the pro-apoptotic protein PUMA (Fig. 4E and I). Both BCLXL and PUMA can also be regulated by p53-independent pathways.[40,41] IMG-7289 thus exerts a pro-apoptotic effect on 3 key regulators of programmed cell death, TP53, BCLXL, and PUMA. The decrease in Jak2 allele burden observed in our mouse model suggests that this effect of LSDi is more pronounced in cells carrying the active Jak2 allele.We addressed the possible selectivity for Jak2 positive cells in an additional model system. We cocultured murineBaf/3 cells expressing the endogenous WT Jak2 with Baf/3 cells expressing Jak2 through retroviral transduction. In this system, WT and Jak2 expressing cells can thus be distinguished by GFP positivity. We determined the rate of apoptosis of wt and Jak2 cells by Annexin V/PI staining. IMG-7289 treatment caused a statistically highly significant and dose-dependent increase in apoptosis of Jak2Baf/3 cells over Baf/3 WT cells (Fig. 4K). This finding suggests that cells with constitutively active Jak2 signaling are more prone to undergo apoptosis following LSD1i, than WT cells, which are affected only marginally.To test, whether a reduction of Jak2 allele burden is caused both by the induction of apoptosis as well as a concomitant decrease in proliferation, we performed cell cycle analysis. SET-2 cells treated with IMG-7289 show a statistically significant reduction of cells in S-phase compared with control (Fig. 4L). The proportion of cells in G2M and G0/1 phase was increased but this change did not reach statistical significance. Hence, LSD1i blocks G1/S transition thereby arresting cell cycle progression. These data suggest that both IMG-7289-induced apoptosis in Jak2 cells and the delay in cell cycle progression play a role in reducing the Jak2 allele burden.As LSD1 demethylates mono- and dimethylated histone 3 at lysine 4[42] and at lysine 9,[43] we investigated the effect of IMG-7289 treatment on global H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 levels in BM of Mx-Jak2mice. Treatment with IMG-7289 significantly increased global levels of both H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 indicating that LSD1 plays a major role in modulating the methylation status of these 2 histone sites in BM cells (Fig. 5A and B). Moreover, these data show that other histone demethylases do not appear to compensate for LSD1i. The lack of compensatory epigenetic mechanisms suggests that tachyphylaxis or resistance to LSD1i is unlikely, making LSD1 an especially attractive pharmacological target.
Figure 5
LSD1 inhibition increases global histone 3 K4 and histone 3 K9 methylation levels in bone marrow cells. (A) Western blot showing protein levels of histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (top), histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation (middle), and total histone 3 (bottom, loading control). (B) Quantification of histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylated and (left) and histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylated protein. n = 3 in triplicate. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests with Welch correction. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.
LSD1 inhibition increases global histone 3 K4 and histone 3 K9 methylation levels in bone marrow cells. (A) Western blot showing protein levels of histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (top), histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation (middle), and total histone 3 (bottom, loading control). (B) Quantification of histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylated and (left) and histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylated protein. n = 3 in triplicate. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests with Welch correction. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.To date, ruxolitinib is the only targeted therapy approved for MPNpatients. However, Newberry et al recently reported that 22/62 (36%) of MF patients acquired new mutations while on ruxolitinib therapy.[8] The most frequently acquired mutation was in ASXL1 (15/22 = 68%), which is concerning, as ASXL1 mutations are associated with inferior survival in MPN.[9] Limiting the exposure to ruxolitinib may lower the selective pressure, reducing the rate at which new mutations emerge. Maximal dose reduction could be achieved if ruxolitinib could be combined with a synergistically acting second agent, as synergy potentiates the effects of low drug concentrations.We therefore investigated potential synergism between Jak1/2 and LSD1i by determining the effect of low doses of ruxolitinib, IMG-7289, or the combination of both drugs on colony formation of SET-2 cells in methylcellulose. While 25 nm IMG-7289 alone significantly reduced colony formation, 175 nm ruxolitinib had almost no effect (Fig. 6A). The combination of both drugs decreased SET-2 cell colony formation to a far greater extent than IMG alone or than the amount expected from an additive effect (Fig. 6A), suggesting that ruxolitinib and IMG-7289 indeed synergize in inhibiting JAK2-driven proliferation. Decrease SET-2 cell proliferation was due to a significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells when suboptimal concentrations of the drugs were combined (Fig. 6B).
Figure 6
Jak1/2 inhibition synergizes in vitro and in vivo with LSD1 inhibition. (A) Number of colonies formed by SET-2 cells, treated either with DMSO, IMG-7289 (25 nM, 50 nM) or ruxolitinib (175 nM) alone or both drugs in combination, as indicated (n = 3 independent experiments). (B) Quantification of apoptosis in SET-2 cells, treated as indicated, detected with FACS for either Annexin V (left) or Annexin V and PI staining (right) (n = 2 independent experiments, each in duplicate). (C) Hematological parameters in peripheral blood of Jak2 mice treated either with vehicle, IMG-7289, ruxolitinib, or IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib (n = 6–9 mice per group). White blood cell (WBC, top left) count, platelet counts (PLT, top right), RBC count (bottom left), and reticulocytes (bottom right). Gray bars depict the normal range for each parameter (except for RBCs, where the normal range is below 107/μL). (D) BM cells were stained with antibodies against a cocktail of lineage markers as well as against c-kit, Sca-1, CD34, Fc-γR, and Flt3/Flk2. Hematopoietic cell populations, defined as previously described,[51,52,55] are depicted as a percentage of total BM cells. Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+ (LSK) cells (left), long-term hematopoietic stem cell (LT-HSC, second to left), short-term hematopoietic stem cell (ST-HSC, second to right) and multipotent progenitor (MPP, right). n = 6 to 8, as indicated. (E) Colony formation of BM from treated Jak2 mice. Colony-forming unit (CFU) granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte (GEMM, left), burst-forming unit erythrocyte (BFU-E, middle), and CFU granulocyte, monocyte (CFU-GM, right). n = 2 to 3 (each in duplicate). (F) Spleen weight of treated Jak2 mice. n = 6 to 7, as indicated. (A–F) Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests with Welch correction. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. BM = bone marrow, RBC = red blood cell.
Jak1/2 inhibition synergizes in vitro and in vivo with LSD1 inhibition. (A) Number of colonies formed by SET-2 cells, treated either with DMSO, IMG-7289 (25 nM, 50 nM) or ruxolitinib (175 nM) alone or both drugs in combination, as indicated (n = 3 independent experiments). (B) Quantification of apoptosis in SET-2 cells, treated as indicated, detected with FACS for either Annexin V (left) or Annexin V and PI staining (right) (n = 2 independent experiments, each in duplicate). (C) Hematological parameters in peripheral blood of Jak2mice treated either with vehicle, IMG-7289, ruxolitinib, or IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib (n = 6–9 mice per group). White blood cell (WBC, top left) count, platelet counts (PLT, top right), RBC count (bottom left), and reticulocytes (bottom right). Gray bars depict the normal range for each parameter (except for RBCs, where the normal range is below 107/μL). (D) BM cells were stained with antibodies against a cocktail of lineage markers as well as against c-kit, Sca-1, CD34, Fc-γR, and Flt3/Flk2. Hematopoietic cell populations, defined as previously described,[51,52,55] are depicted as a percentage of total BM cells. Lineage−, c-kit+, Sca-1+ (LSK) cells (left), long-term hematopoietic stem cell (LT-HSC, second to left), short-term hematopoietic stem cell (ST-HSC, second to right) and multipotent progenitor (MPP, right). n = 6 to 8, as indicated. (E) Colony formation of BM from treated Jak2mice. Colony-forming unit (CFU) granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte (GEMM, left), burst-forming unit erythrocyte (BFU-E, middle), and CFU granulocyte, monocyte (CFU-GM, right). n = 2 to 3 (each in duplicate). (F) Spleen weight of treated Jak2mice. n = 6 to 7, as indicated. (A–F) Mean and standard error of mean are shown. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student t tests with Welch correction. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. BM = bone marrow, RBC = red blood cell.Next, we determined whether IMG and ruxolitinib also synergize in vivo. Cohorts consisting of 7 to 8 MxJak2 mice, equal in age, sex, and blood counts were treated with vehicle, IMG-7289 (15 mg/kg body weight, once daily) or ruxolitinib (30 mg/kg body weight, b.i.d.) alone or in combination for 42 days. CBCs were assessed at 14-day intervals. While treatment with either ruxolitinib or IMG-7289 alone stabilized or slightly decreased the leukocyte count, the combination of both drugs normalized leukocyte counts within 14 days of treatment, clearly demonstrating synergism of this low-dose combination regimen (Fig. 6C, left, the gray bar indicates the range of normal blood values of WT littermate controls).Platelet counts were reduced mildly by ruxolitinib alone but normalized either by IMG-7289 alone or by the combination treatment (Fig. 6C, second from the left). While the thromboreductive effect is thus not synergistic, it is important to note that thrombocytopenia was neither pronounced nor exacerbated by the low-dose drug combination. By contrast, at doses of 45 mg/kg of IMG-7289, platelet counts were dramatically decreased (Fig. 1B), strengthening the finding, that the effect of LSD1i on platelet production is dose dependent rather than due to unspecific toxicity.The effect of all 3 treatment regimen on red blood cell (RBC) number was mild, but, by the end of treatment, statistically significantly larger with the drug combination than with the single agents (Fig. 6C, second to right). More importantly, the reticulocyte count, a measure for the erythropoietic activity, normalized in both IMG-7289 and combination treated mice at day 42 (Fig. 6C, right). Given the extended life span of erythrocytes (63 days in mice) normalization of the reticulocyte count is predicted to lead to normal RBC numbers with longer follow-up.As the abnormal CBCs in MPNpatients and murine models are driven by increased proliferation of stem and progenitor cells in the BM, effective treatment requires normalization of this compartment. FACS analysis of stem and progenitor populations in the BM revealed that ruxolitinib treatment alone slightly decreased the most immature populations, LSK and LT-HSCs, but did not affect ST-HSCs and MPPs. Likewise, IMG-7289 alone had no significant effect on these populations. The low-dose combination, however, significantly decreased the percentage of all 4 stem and progenitor populations assayed: LSK, LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and MPPs (Fig. 6D).We investigated whether the decrease in stem and progenitor cells evident by FACS analysis was also manifested by a decrease in the number of hematopoietic colonies arising from the BM of IMG-7289-, ruxolitinib-, or doubly treated mice. BM cells from control and treated MxJak2 mice were cultured in methylcellulose containing erythropoietin, IL3, IL6, and SCF and colony growth scored on day 14. As single agents, neither IMG-7289 nor ruxolitinib caused a significant decrease in colony-forming unit (CFU) granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte (GEMM), CFU-GM, or burst-forming unit erythrocyte growth (Fig. 6E). IMG-7289 alone showed a nonsignificant increase in CFU-GM, which is consistent with the previously published observation by Sprussel et al that LSD1i causes an increase in monocytic cells.[10] By contrast, the low-dose combination significantly reduced both the most primitive, multilineage CFU-GEMM cells, as well as erythroid BFU-E burst formation. Thus, IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib synergize to curtail stem and progenitor cell expansion in a murineMPN model.Ruxolitinib was approved for MPNpatients mainly due to its often compelling effect on spleen size. Therefore, as expected, splenomegaly was already significantly ameliorated in ruxolitinib-treated mice, albeit with spleens remaining 4 to 5 times the normal size, while IMG-7289 alone did not lead to a significant reduction (Fig. 6F). Spleen size was further reduced by another 60% in mice receiving the combination therapy (Fig. 6F).
Discussion
Aberrant activation of JAK-STAT signaling through JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations is the main contributor to the MPN phenotype. Consequently, JAK1/2 inhibitors were developed with the hope of efficiently managing symptoms as well as eliminating the malignant clone. While the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib reduces splenomegaly and inflammation, thereby significantly improving patient quality of life, full molecular remissions are exceedingly rare. On the contrary, a recent report detailing acquisitions of novel, prognostically unfavorable mutations during ruxolitinib treatment, is reason for concern.[8] Thus, Ruxolitinib treatment so far has shown limited impact on the JAK2 mutant clone.[3-7] This can be due either to insufficient JAK inhibition or because malignant clones do not depend exclusively on constitutive JAK2 activation. Crucially, the natural history of MPNs is largely unaffected by clinical JAK1/2 inhibition.Here we use both a novel and 2 established mouse models of MPNs to explore the effects of inhibiting LSD1, a chromatin-modulating enzyme shown to be critical for normal myeloid maturation and for self-renewal of leukemia initiating cells. Each of these mouse models recapitulates essential features of MPNs including clonal expansion of mutant cells, increased inflammatory cytokines, and elevated peripheral cell counts including thrombocytosis, splenomegaly, and MF. In both Jak2 and in MPL-driven models, inhibition of LSD1 activity dramatically impacted the pathologic features of MPNs. Thrombocytosis and neutrophilia were reduced significantly (Fig. 1B and C), splenomegaly and splenic architecture (Fig. 2C and D) were improved, and inflammatory Cxcl5 levels lowered significantly (Fig. 2B, Fig. S1L, Supplemental Digital Content). Similar effects have been reported in MPNmouse models treated with ruxolitinib although to varying degrees.[20] In addition, however, LSD1i significantly reduced MF and the mutant allele burden, effects not reported in these models with ruxolitinib.Because LSD1 and JAK2 function in different intracellular pathways, we explored the possibility that their concurrent inhibition may yield synergistic effects. Indeed, low doses of IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib, which were suboptimally effective on their own, showed more than additive effects in combination (Fig. 6). As both the levels of side effects and the risk of selecting resistant clones may correlate with drug doses administered, the efficacy of a low-dose combination regimen in our preclinical setting warrants investigation of this therapeutic option.The marked reduction in fibrosis by LSD1i the MPL MF model (Fig. 2F) is a novel and significant observation in this study. Fibrosis is among the most crucial determinants of disease course and morbidity in MF patients.[44] Interferon alpha is the only drug reported to reverse fibrosis in a subset of MPNpatients when given early in the course of the disease.[45,46] The marked reduction of grade 3 fibrosis in the MPLmice suggests that LSD1i may reverse MF in patients in advanced stages of the disease.The significant reduction in mutant allele frequency is another important in vivo effect of IMG-7289. We show that IMG-7289 induces apoptosis preferentially in mutant cells by several mechanisms including the enhanced activity of TP53, and, independently, due to the presence of a homozygous R248W mutation in the SET-2 cells used,[38] an increase in PUMA expression, and a concomitant reduction of BCLXL levels. The pro-survival factor BCLXL, which is overexpressed in PV patients,[32] may contribute to EPO-independent erythropoiesis, a pathognomonic feature of PV. BCLXL overexpressing mutant cells may thus be exquisitely sensitive to reduction of BCLXL levels by LSD1i. As PUMA induces apoptosis by binding BCLXL, thereby dissociating the antiapoptotic BCLXL-BAX complex,[47] selective sensitivity of MPN cells may be amplified by the concurrent repression of BCLXL transcription and its functional inactivation by increased PUMA levels.IMG-7289 also impairs the progression of mutant cells through the cell cycle. Cell cycle arrest following DNA damage is likewise TP53-mediated and may be more pronounced in the MPN clone due to JAK2-mediated accumulation of ROS and the subsequent induction of double-stranded DNA breaks.[48] Moreover, TP53 has been shown to be functionally inactivated in JAK2-positive cells by MDM2-mediated degradation.[49] Which of these mechanisms plays the greater role in reducing the fitness of mutant cells is not known but our observations admit the possibility that the mutant cell population might be successfully eroded over time with the pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 by IMG-7289.In this study, we show that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 activity by the oral agent IMG-7289 in a preclinical MPN model affect several pathways that facilitate the selective growth advantage of the malignant clone (Fig. 7). IMG-7289 induces both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of JAK2 mutant cells while concurrently reducing inflammation and fibrosis resulting in significantly prolonged survival of Jak2mice.
Figure 7
Mode of action of LSD1 inhibition in MPN. Model displaying the mode of action by which LSD1 inhibition affects inflammation, fibrosis, proliferation, apoptosis, and overall survival. ECM = extra cellular matrix. ∗ = Skoda, unpublished, ∗∗ = Wehrle, Haematologica, 2013. MPN = myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Mode of action of LSD1 inhibition in MPN. Model displaying the mode of action by which LSD1 inhibition affects inflammation, fibrosis, proliferation, apoptosis, and overall survival. ECM = extra cellular matrix. ∗ = Skoda, unpublished, ∗∗ = Wehrle, Haematologica, 2013. MPN = myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Materials and methods
Generation Mx1cre-Jak2V617F mice
The conditional floxed Jak2 ki mice, a generous gift by Jean-Luc Villeval, have been previously described.[15] Jak2-ki mice were crossed with Mx1cre transgenic mice (Tg(Mx1-cre)1Cgn: JAX stock No. 003556) to generate an inducible mutation. Double transgenic mice, which carry a WT Jak2 and a mutated Jak2 allele (Jak2), as well as the Mx1cre recombinase (called Mx-Jak2V617F), were used for inhibitor treatment.
Jak2V617F BM transplantation model
Murine BM was retrovirally transduced using an MSCV-IRES-GFP-Jak2 vector and transplanted into lethally irradiated recipients as previously described.[21,22] Mice with established disease were treated with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-7289 (45 mg/kg, q.d., oral gavage) for 14 days. Peripheral blood GFP levels were determined at the beginning and at the end of treatment.
IMG-7289 and ruxolitinib treatment and analysis of Mx1cre-Jak2 mice
IMG-7289 or ruxolitinib in aqueous solution contained 0.5% Tween-80 and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). IMG-7289 and vehicle treatment groups were equal in age, sex, hematocrit, and leukocyte count at day 0 of treatment. IMG-7289 (45 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle (0.5% of both CMC and Tween-80) was administered daily by oral gavage for either 14, 42, or 56 consecutive days. Ruxolitinib (30 mg/kg body weight) was administered twice daily by oral gavage. Blood was drawn by retro-bulbar puncture and complete blood cell measurement performed (ADVIA 120, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). BM was harvested by flushing both tibiae and 1 femur. One femur was used for histopathological analysis. Spleens were weighed then used for histopathology and for generating single cell suspensions.
MPL BM transplantation model
MPL BM transplantation experiments were performed as described previously.[50] Shortly, prestimulated c-kit enriched BM cells were subjected to 2 rounds of cosedimentation with viral supernatant containing MSCV-hMPL-IRES-GFP or empty MSCV-IRES-GFP control vector. A total of 1 × 106 cells (∼25% to 40% GFP-positive, MPLW515L-expressing cells) were injected into the tail veins of lethally irradiated syngeneic mice. At first signs of disease, mice were randomized based on WBC counts and GFP levels to begin treatment with the LSD1 inhibitor IMG-98 (5 mg/kg, q.d., oral gavage) or vehicle for 28 days. Mice were monitored daily for signs of illness and nonlethal bleeds were performed bi-weekly to follow-up disease progression.
Animal housing and protection
Mx1cre-Jak2 and MSCV-IRES-GFP-Jak2mice were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions at the research mouse facility of the University Medical Center Freiburg. Experiments were performed in accordance with committee-approved animal protocols (Environment and Consumer Protection of the state Baden-Württemberg, Germany [G-13/100, G-17/43]).MPL animal experiments were performed in accordance with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved animal protocol.
Histopathological analysis
Femur and spleen samples were fixed in 4% formalin (Mx1cre-Jak2mice) or 4% paraformaldehyde (MPLmice) overnight. Femora were consecutively decalcified in 10% buffered ethylene-diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), pH 7.2. Organs were embedded in paraffin as previously described.[26] Sections were either stained automatically with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or manually for reticulin fibers using silver impregnation method kit (Bio-Optica, Milano, Italy).
Cell line and in vitro treatment
The human cell lines SET-2 (ATCC 608) and HEK293 were cultured in RPMI or DMEM, respectively, supplemented with either 20% (SET-2) or 10% (HEK293) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin. Cells were kept at a density of 5 × 105 to 106 cells/mL. The murine cell line Baf/3 was cultured in RPMI (10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin). Baf/3 WT and Baf/3 Jak2 cells were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1. IMG-7289 was dissolved in DMSO and applied daily to cultured cells for up to 96 hours, as indicated. DMSO was applied to control cells at equal volumes.
Western blotting and antibodies
Murine BM cells were lysed in 5× SDS buffer (250 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 10% SDS, 0.5% bromophenol blue, 50% glycerol, and 50 mM dithio-d-threitol) and subsequently sheared using a 26G needle. SET-2 cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris—HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 1% Triton X-100) and homogenized for 10 min at 4°C by vigorous vortexing. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. Protein concentrations were estimated by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA, No. 500-0007) and lysates subjected to western blotting. The following primary antibodies were used: BCLXL (CST, No. 2764), TP53 (CST, No. 9282), TP53-di-methyl-Lys370 (SAB, No. HW106), PUMA (D30C10) (CST, No. 12450), H3K4me3 (active motif, No. 39159), and H3K9me2 (active motif, No. 39239). Blots were stripped and re-probed for ß-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, No. A5441) or total histone H3 (CST, Danvers, MA, USA, No. 9715) to control for equal loading. Immunocomplexes were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence and analyzed densitometrically using the ImageJ software.
FACS analysis of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
BM was stained with a cocktail against lineage markers (CD3, CD11b, B220, Ter119, and Ly6G/6C; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and for c-Kit (clone 2B8; eBioscience, Waltham, MA, USA), Sca-1 (clone D7; BioLegend), CD34 (clone MEC14.7; BioLegend), Fc-γ-II/III-R (clone 93; eBioscience), Thy1.1 (clone OX7; BioLegend), and Flt3 (clone A2F10; eBioscience). Stem and progenitor cell subpopulations were identified as previously described[51-53]; gating strategies were determined by fluorescence minus one staining.[26]
Apoptosis and cell cycle analysis
Apoptosis was assessed with the “FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with PI” (BioLegend, No. 640914). Hoechst 33342 stating was used for cell cycle analysis.[27]
Colony assays
BM cells were seeded in methylcellulose media with EPO, IL3, IL6, and SCF (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada, MethoCult M3434) for CFU-GEMM, CFU-GM, and BFU-E assays and incubated for 12 days at 37°C, 5% CO2. For correct identification of BFU-E, colonies were stained with benzidine.
Quantitative PCR/quantitative RT-PCR
Jak2V617F allele burden
For each sample, 200 ng of murine PB leukocyte or BM gDNA was used and assayed in duplicate. The PCR strategy employed constitutes an adaptation of the assay optimized for Jak2 quantification on human DNA.[54] The reverse primers span the intron/exon boundary at the 3′ end of exon 13. One reverse primer (Jak2 all) quantitates both the wt and the V617F mutant allele while the other primer (Jak2V617F) carries the single basepair mismatch and thus detects the V617F allele.Common forward primer: 5′-CAGCAAGCATGATGAGTCAGCTTT-3′Jak2 reverse primer: 3′-AAGTCACCTCTCCTCTCATTCATTT-5′Jak2 all reverse primer: 3′-CACCTCTCCTCTCATTCATTTCGGT-5′The ratio of mutated Jak2 to total Jak2 was determined and represented as percent mutated cells. As all cells are in a heterozygous state, the Jak2 mutant allele burden reaches a maximum of 50%. To indicate the percentage of cells carrying the mutant allele, maximal mutant allele burden was set at 100% indicating all cells carried the mutation.
Nfe2 expression
Reverse transcription of 200 ng of total BM RNA was performed using the TaqMan Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA, No. 4368813). MurineNfe2 mRNA expression was quantitated using the following reagents:Forward primer, 5′-CTTTCTGGTGCTTGTCTCACTGAC-3′Reverse primer, 5′-GGTGGCGTGAGTATACTTGAATTTG-3′and probe, 6-FAM-ATCCAGAAAACCCC-MGBNFQ; murine ß-2-microglobulin was assays with an Assay on Demand (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR assays were performed in duplicate using a LightCycler 480 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Differences in Nfe2 expression were determined using the −ΔΔCT method.
Cxcl5 determination
The Cxcl5 concentration in plasma of Mx-Jak2mice was determined by ELISA (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, No. EMCXCL5), in plasma of MPLmice by Luminex Multiplex-Assay (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA, MCYTMAG-70K-PX32).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with Student t tests. Survival analysis was conducted using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Densitometry was performed using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank Franziska Zipfel for expert technical assistance and Prof Dr Borner as well as Dr Lukas Peintner for providing intellectual and technical support.
Author contributions
JSJ: Design of the study, conducting experiments (Mx-Jak2VF, in vitro studies), acquiring and analyzing data. Writing the manuscript.MK: Conducting experiments (MPLW515L model), acquiring and analyzing data.JD: Conducting experiments (in vitro studies, RNAseq), analyzing data.HFS: Conducting experiments (Mx-Jak2VF model).KS: Conducting experiments (MPLW515L model).JT-F: Analyzing data (histopathology/MPLW515L model).SMMG: Conducting experiments (JAK2V617F BMT model).CD: Conducting experiments (JAK2V617F BMT model).HYR: Providing reagents (IMG-98, IMG-7289) and intellectual input.RLL: Design of the study, providing reagents.HLP: Design of the study, providing reagents, intellectual input, writing the manuscript.
Authors: Philipp S Goerttler; Clemens Kreutz; Johannes Donauer; Daniel Faller; Thomas Maiwald; Edith März; Brigitta Rumberger; Titus Sparna; Annette Schmitt-Gräff; Jochen Wilpert; Jens Timmer; Gerd Walz; Heike L Pahl Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: S Dumon; S C Santos; F Debierre-Grockiego; V Gouilleux-Gruart; L Cocault; C Boucheron; P Mollat; S Gisselbrecht; F Gouilleux Journal: Oncogene Date: 1999-07-22 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Srdan Verstovsek; Hagop Kantarjian; Ruben A Mesa; Animesh D Pardanani; Jorge Cortes-Franco; Deborah A Thomas; Zeev Estrov; Jordan S Fridman; Edward C Bradley; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Kris Vaddi; Richard Levy; Ayalew Tefferi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R A Shivdasani; M F Rosenblatt; D Zucker-Franklin; C W Jackson; P Hunt; C J Saris; S H Orkin Journal: Cell Date: 1995-06-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Yana Pikman; Benjamin H Lee; Thomas Mercher; Elizabeth McDowell; Benjamin L Ebert; Maricel Gozo; Adam Cuker; Gerlinde Wernig; Sandra Moore; Ilene Galinsky; Daniel J DeAngelo; Jennifer J Clark; Stephanie J Lee; Todd R Golub; Martha Wadleigh; D Gary Gilliland; Ross L Levine Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Adlen Foudi; Daniel J Kramer; Jinzhong Qin; Denise Ye; Anna-Sophie Behlich; Scott Mordecai; Frederic I Preffer; Arnaud Amzallag; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Konrad Hochedlinger; Stuart H Orkin; Hanno Hock Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: C N Harrison; A M Vannucchi; J-J Kiladjian; H K Al-Ali; H Gisslinger; L Knoops; F Cervantes; M M Jones; K Sun; M McQuitty; V Stalbovskaya; P Gopalakrishna; T Barbui Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 11.528