Literature DB >> 31723301

Native internally calibrated chromatin immunoprecipitation for quantitative studies of histone post-translational modifications.

Adrian T Grzybowski1, Rohan N Shah1,2, William F Richter1, Alexander J Ruthenburg3,4.   

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has served as the central method for the study of histone modifications for the past decade. In ChIP-seq analyses, antibodies selectively capture nucleosomes bearing a modification of interest and the associated DNA is then mapped to the genome to determine the distribution of the mark. This approach has several important drawbacks: (i) ChIP interpretation necessitates the assumption of perfect antibody specificity, despite growing evidence that this is often not the case. (ii) Common methods for evaluating antibody specificity in other formats have little or no bearing on specificity within a ChIP experiment. (iii) Uncalibrated ChIP is reported as relative enrichment, which is biologically meaningless outside the experimental reference frame defined by a discrete immunoprecipitation (IP), thus preventing facile comparison across experimental conditions or modifications. (iv) Differential library amplification and loading onto next-generation sequencers, as well as computational normalization, can further compromise quantitative relationships that may exist between samples. Consequently, the researcher is presented with a series of potential pitfalls and is blind to nearly all of them. Here we provide a detailed protocol for internally calibrated ChIP (ICeChIP), a method we recently developed to resolve these problems by spike-in of defined nucleosomal standards within a ChIP procedure. This protocol is optimized for specificity and quantitative power, allowing for measurement of antibody specificity and absolute measurement of histone modification density (HMD) at genomic loci on a biologically meaningful scale enabling unambiguous comparisons. We provide guidance on optimal conditions for next-generation sequencing (NGS) and instructions for data analysis. This protocol takes between 17 and 18 h, excluding time for sequencing or bioinformatic analysis. The ICeChIP procedure enables accurate measurement of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) genome-wide in mammalian cells as well as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating suitability for use in eukaryotic cells more broadly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31723301      PMCID: PMC7158589          DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0218-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  64 in total

1.  The language of covalent histone modifications.

Authors:  B D Strahl; C D Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Chromatin modifications and their function.

Authors:  Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Analysis of epigenetic modifications of chromatin at specific gene loci by native chromatin immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes isolated using hydroxyapatite chromatography.

Authors:  Marjorie Brand; Shravanti Rampalli; Chandra-Prakash Chaturvedi; F Jeffrey Dilworth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans.

Authors:  Alvaro Rada-Iglesias; Ruchi Bajpai; Tomek Swigut; Samantha A Brugmann; Ryan A Flynn; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Enhancer priming by H3K4 methyltransferase MLL4 controls cell fate transition.

Authors:  Chaochen Wang; Ji-Eun Lee; Binbin Lai; Todd S Macfarlan; Shiliyang Xu; Lenan Zhuang; Chengyu Liu; Weiqun Peng; Kai Ge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Gary C Hon; R David Hawkins; Pouya Kheradpour; Alexander Stark; Lindsey F Harp; Zhen Ye; Leonard K Lee; Rhona K Stuart; Christina W Ching; Keith A Ching; Jessica E Antosiewicz-Bourget; Hui Liu; Xinmin Zhang; Roland D Green; Victor V Lobanenkov; Ron Stewart; James A Thomson; Gregory E Crawford; Manolis Kellis; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why?

Authors:  Eliezer Calo; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  FOXA1 Directs H3K4 Monomethylation at Enhancers via Recruitment of the Methyltransferase MLL3.

Authors:  Kamila M Jozwik; Igor Chernukhin; Aurelien A Serandour; Sankari Nagarajan; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  5 in total

1.  Chromatin and transcription factor profiling in rare stem cell populations using CUT&Tag.

Authors:  Yuefeng Li; Kiran Nakka; Thomas Olender; Philippe Gingras-Gelinas; Matthew Man-Kin Wong; Daniel C L Robinson; Hina Bandukwala; Carmen G Palii; Odile Neyret; Marjorie Brand; Alexandre Blais; F Jeffrey Dilworth
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-08-19

2.  Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to Study DNA-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Eliza C Small; Danielle N Maryanski; Keli L Rodriguez; Kevin J Harvey; Michael-C Keogh; Andrea L Johnstone
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Lysines Acetylome and Methylome Profiling of H3 and H4 Histones in Trichostatin A-Treated Stem Cells.

Authors:  Flora Cozzolino; Ilaria Iacobucci; Vittoria Monaco; Tiziana Angrisano; Maria Monti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Non-canonical H3K79me2-dependent pathways promote the survival of MLL-rearranged leukemia.

Authors:  William F Richter; Rohan N Shah; Alexander J Ruthenburg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  A physical basis for quantitative ChIP-sequencing.

Authors:  Bradley M Dickson; Rochelle L Tiedemann; Alison A Chomiak; Evan M Cornett; Robert M Vaughan; Scott B Rothbart
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.