| Literature DB >> 31723223 |
Guosheng Xu1,2,3,4,5, Feima Wu1,2,3,4, Xiaotong Gu1, Jiaye Zhang1, Kai You1,2,3, Yan Chen1,2,3, Anteneh Getachew1,2,3,4, Yuanqi Zhuang1,2,3,4, Xiaofen Zhong1,2,3,4, Zuoxian Lin1, Dongsheng Guo1,2,3,4, Fan Yang1,2,3, Tingcai Pan1,2,3,4, Hongcheng Wei6, Yin-Xiong Li7,8,9,10,11,12.
Abstract
Transdifferentiation of other cell type into human neuronal cells (hNCs) provides a platform for neural disease modeling, drug screening and potential cell-based therapies. Among all of the cell donor sources, human urine cells (hUCs) are convenient to obtain without invasive harvest procedure. Here, we report a novel approach for the transdifferentiation of hUCs into hNCs. Our study demonstrated that a combination of seven small molecules (CAYTFVB) cocktail induced transdifferentiation of hUCs into hNCs. These chemical-induced neuronal cells (CiNCs) exhibited typical neuron-like morphology and expressed mature neuronal markers. The neuronal-like morphology revealed in day 1, and the Tuj1-positive CiNCs reached to about 58% in day 5 and 38.36% Tuj1+/MAP2+ double positive cells in day 12. Partial electrophysiological properties of CiNCs was obtained using patch clamp. Most of the CiNCs generated using our protocol were glutamatergic neuron populations, whereas motor neurons, GABAergic or dopaminergic neurons were merely detected. hUCs derived from different donors were converted into CiNCs in this work. This method may provide a feasible and noninvasive approach for reprogramming hNCs from hUCs for disease models and drug screening.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31723223 PMCID: PMC6854089 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53007-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1CAYTFVB seven small molecules could convert human urine cells into neurons. (A) Scheme of induction procedure. C, CHIR99021; A, A8301; Y, Y-27632; T, TTNPB; F, Forskolin; V, VPA; B, NaB. (B–E) Immunofluorescence staining analysis showed that VPA and NaB promote the generation of Tuj1+/MAP2+ neuronal cells. Cells were treated with CAYTF, CAYTF + NaB, CAYTF + VPA, or CAYTF + VPA + NaB respectively, immunofluorescence staining was performed at day 12. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Quantification of Tuj1+/MAP2 + cells. Cells were counted 12 days post chemical treatments. (means ± SEM, n = 20 random selected × 20 fields from triplicate samples). (G) Voltage-clamp recordings of cells 12 days post chemical treatments. Cells were depolarized from −50 mV to 60 mV in 10 mV increments. (H) Neuronal genes were upregulation at day 7 during chemical induction. hUCs were treated with CAYTFVB for 7 days. hUCs (no treatment) were used as negative control and all sample data was normalized to that of hUCs, which was considered as 1. hES derived neurons were used as positive control. Data of three independent experiment were shown as means ± SEM. Statistical assessment of the differences was performed by one-way ANOVA compared to negative control group. (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ns = not significant). (I) Withdrawal of any small molecule from CAYTFVB cocktail resulted in a reduction of the induction efficiency. hUCs were treated with indicated chemical for 5 days. The percentage of Tuj1-positive neuronal cells represent the induction efficiencies. (means ± SEM, n = 20 random selected × 20 fields from triplicate samples).
Figure 2VC promotes the survival and maturation of the induced neuronal cells. (A) Scheme of induction procedure. Initial urine cells were seeded onto plates and cultured in urine cells medium. After 2 days, cells were transferred into neuronal induction medium with chemical cocktails CAYTFVB for 7 days, and then cells were switched to neuronal maturation medium with CAYTF + VC for another 10 days. Afterwards, cells were cultured with neuronal medium. C, CHIR99021; A, A8301; Y, Y-27632; T, TTNPB; F, Forskolin; V, VPA; B, NaB; VC, vitamin C. (B) Bright-field image of control hUCs (left) or CiNCs at day 5 (middle) and day 17 (right). Scale bars, 50 μm. (C) Induced cells display typical neuronal morphologies and express Tuj1 at day 17. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D–I) Immunofluorescence staining of CiNCs at day 17 with antibodies against the indicated markers: GFAP, astrocyte marker; NeuN, Tau, NF-01, MAP2 and SYN, mature neuronal markers. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Figure 3Induced cells are glutamatergic neurons. (A–D) Immunofluorescence staining of CiNCs for subtype-specific neuronal markers. The neuron type was characterized at day 17. Induced neurons express glutamatergic marker (Glu), while other neuron type markers including GABA, HB9 and TH are rarely detected. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Figure 4CiNCs possess partial electrophysiological properties. (A–C) Representative recordings of voltage-gated ion channels from a neuron of CiNCs. An outward current was observed as early as 3 days after chemical treatment (A) and an inward current was observed as as early as 7 days after chemical treatment (B); typical inward current and outward current was observed at day 17 (C). (D) The fast-inward currents were completely blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX). (E) CiNCs failed to firing of action potentials at day 17 or day 47.