Literature DB >> 317230

Comparison of contrast thresholds of large bars and checks measured by VECPs and psychophysically as a function of defocusing.

E Adachi-Usami.   

Abstract

The effects of defocusing the image on the contrast threshold were studied both for checkerboard and bar patterns at various low spatial frequencies, and comparison was made between psychophysical results and visually evoked cortical potentials (VECPs) results. VECP threshold was defined as the contrast necessary for obtaining a criterion amplitude of 5 muV. When increasing the degree of defocusing, the lowest contrast threshold shifted towards larger checks or bars, the contrast threshold increased more abruptly for smaller sizes, and the VECP contrast thresholds increased more than the psychophysical ones, especially for smaller sizes. No significant difference was found in the contrast thresholds between the results with bar patterns and checkerboard patterns, except that for bars, the VECP threshold as defined was approx. 0.2 log units higher than those for checkerboard.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 317230     DOI: 10.1007/bf00413319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0065-6100


  21 in total

1.  Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  M A Berkley; F Kitterle; D W Watkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of myopic subjects.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; L Maffei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience.

Authors:  D E Mitchell; R D Freeman; M Millodot; G Haegerstrom
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A clinical method for obtaining pattern visual evoked responses.

Authors:  J Behrman; S Nissim; G B Arden
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Refraction determined electrophysiologically. Responses to alternation of visual contours.

Authors:  M Millodot; L A Riggs
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-09

7.  Independence of evoked potentials and apparent size.

Authors:  D Regan; W Richards
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J J Kulikowski; J Levinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina.

Authors:  D E Mitchell; R D Freeman; G Westheimer
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Accommodation power determined with transient pattern visual evoked cortical potentials in diabetes.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; E Adachi-Usami; N Kuroda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Accommodation power determined with visual evoked cortical potentials in psychogenic visual disturbances.

Authors:  H Yamazaki; S Munakata
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.