Literature DB >> 31722396

A maximum likelihood approach to electronic health record phenotyping using positive and unlabeled patients.

Lingjiao Zhang1, Xiruo Ding2, Yanyuan Ma3, Naveen Muthu4, Imran Ajmal2, Jason H Moore1, Daniel S Herman2, Jinbo Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Phenotyping patients using electronic health record (EHR) data conventionally requires labeled cases and controls. Assigning labels requires manual medical chart review and therefore is labor intensive. For some phenotypes, identifying gold-standard controls is prohibitive. We developed an accurate EHR phenotyping approach that does not require labeled controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our framework relies on a random subset of cases, which can be specified using an anchor variable that has excellent positive predictive value and sensitivity independent of predictors. We proposed a maximum likelihood approach that efficiently leverages data from the specified cases and unlabeled patients to develop logistic regression phenotyping models, and compare model performance with existing algorithms.
RESULTS: Our method outperformed the existing algorithms on predictive accuracy in Monte Carlo simulation studies, application to identify hypertension patients with hypokalemia requiring oral supplementation using a simulated anchor, and application to identify primary aldosteronism patients using real-world cases and anchor variables. Our method additionally generated consistent estimates of 2 important parameters, phenotype prevalence and the proportion of true cases that are labeled. DISCUSSION: Upon identification of an anchor variable that is scalable and transferable to different practices, our approach should facilitate development of scalable, transferable, and practice-specific phenotyping models.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed approach enables accurate semiautomated EHR phenotyping with minimal manual labeling and therefore should greatly facilitate EHR clinical decision support and research.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anchor variable; electronic health record; maximum likelihood; phenotype prevalence; phenotyping

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31722396      PMCID: PMC6913222          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  28 in total

1.  Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: challenges, recent advances, and perspectives.

Authors:  Jyotishman Pathak; Abel N Kho; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Have Electronic Health Records Improved the Quality of Patient Care?

Authors:  Louis Krenn; David Schlossman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Classification with Noisy Labels by Importance Reweighting.

Authors:  Tongliang Liu; Dacheng Tao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Guidelines for primary aldosteronism: uptake by primary care physicians in Europe.

Authors:  Paolo Mulatero; Silvia Monticone; Jacopo Burrello; Franco Veglio; Tracy A Williams; John Funder
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Reliability of a Bayesian network to predict an elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio.

Authors:  Michel Ducher; Claire Mounier-Véhier; Pierre Lantelme; Bernard Vaisse; Jean-Philippe Baguet; Jean-Pierre Fauvel
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.340

7.  Screening for primary aldosteronism with a logistic multivariate discriminant analysis.

Authors:  G P Rossi; E Rossi; E Pavan; N Rosati; R Zecchel; A Semplicini; F Perazzoli; A C Pessina
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Implementing electronic health records (EHRs): health care provider perceptions before and after transition from a local basic EHR to a commercial comprehensive EHR.

Authors:  Marie Krousel-Wood; Allison B McCoy; Chad Ahia; Elizabeth W Holt; Donnalee N Trapani; Qingyang Luo; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Eric J Thomas; Dean F Sittig; Richard V Milani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.

Authors:  Max J Romano; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-24

10.  Electronic medical record phenotyping using the anchor and learn framework.

Authors:  Yoni Halpern; Steven Horng; Youngduck Choi; David Sontag
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Yiqing Zhao; Yue Yu; Hanyin Wang; Yikuan Li; Yu Deng; Guoqian Jiang; Yuan Luo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.228

2.  A high-throughput phenotyping algorithm is portable from adult to pediatric populations.

Authors:  Alon Geva; Molei Liu; Vidul A Panickan; Paul Avillach; Tianxi Cai; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Phenotyping issues for exploring electronic health records to design clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill Schnall; LingJiao Zhang; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.599

4.  Phenotyping coronavirus disease 2019 during a global health pandemic: Lessons learned from the characterization of an early cohort.

Authors:  Sarah DeLozier; Sarah Bland; Melissa McPheeters; Quinn Wells; Eric Farber-Eger; Cosmin A Bejan; Daniel Fabbri; Trent Rosenbloom; Dan Roden; Kevin B Johnson; Wei-Qi Wei; Josh Peterson; Lisa Bastarache
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.