| Literature DB >> 31721313 |
Xiaodong Gu1,2,3, Sudong Liu1,2,3, Xuemin Guo1,2,3, Ruiqiang Weng1,2,3, Zhixiong Zhong1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the infection and antimicrobial resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in patients with genitourinary symptoms among Hakka population in Meizhou, China.Entities:
Keywords: Hakka; antimicrobial susceptibility; infection; mycoplasma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31721313 PMCID: PMC7171337 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
Figure 1Trend of the prevalence of Uu and Mh in female and male patients
Figure 2Age‐specific prevalence of Uu and Mh in female and male patients
Antimicrobial resistance rate (%) of Uu infection in patients
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | |
| TET | 12 (6.1) | 37 (6.9) | 39 (6.0) | 44 (11.9) | 176 (6.9) |
| LEV | 12 (6.1) | 31 (5.8) | 19 (2.9) | 34 (4.5) | 161 (6.3) |
| ERY | 25 (12.6) | 128 (23.9) | 87 (13.4) | 164 (21.5) | 267 (10.5) |
| JOS | 1 (0.5) | 2 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (0.2) |
| DOX | 9 (4.5) | 26 (4.9) | 22 (3.4) | 25 (3.3) | 117 (4.6) |
| CIP | 126 (63.6) | 396 (73.9) | 480 (73.8) | 589 (77.1) | 1881 (73.8) |
| OFX | 11 (5.6) | 27 (5.0) | 21 (3.2) | 44 (5.8) | 89 (3.5) |
| MIN | 9 (4.5) | 25 (4.7) | 21 (3.2) | 25 (3.3) | 104 (4.1) |
| ROX | 12 (6.1) | 53 (9.9) | 29 (4.5) | 86 (11.3) | 114 (4.5) |
| AZM | 10 (5.1) | 32 (6.0) | 10 (1.5) | 26 (3.4) | 58 (2.3) |
| CLR | 9 (4.5) | 26 (4.9) | 11 (1.7) | 25 (3.3) | 54 (2.1) |
| SPA | 15 (7.6) | 89 (16.6) | 76 (11.7) | 195 (25.5) | 261 (10.2) |
| n | 198 | 536 | 650 | 764 | 2550 |
Abbreviations: AZM, azithromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLR, clarithromycin; DOX, doxycycline; ERY, erythromycin; JOS, josamycin; LEV, levofloxacin; MIN, minocycline; OFX, ofloxacin; ROX, roxithromycin; SPA, sparfloxacin; TET, tetracycline; Uu, Ureaplasma urealyticum.
Antimicrobial resistance rate (%) of Mh infection in patients
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | |
| TET | 0 (0.0) | 2 (12.5) | 3 (13.6) | 1 (3.4) | 14 (17.5) |
| LEV | 2 (40.0) | 5 (31.3) | 8 (36.4) | 9 (31.0) | 39 (48.8) |
| ERY | 5 (100.0) | 15 (93.8) | 20 (90.9) | 28 (96.6) | 65 (81.3) |
| JOS | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.3) |
| DOX | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| CIP | 3 (60.0) | 9 (56.3) | 11 (50.0) | 13 (44.8) | 48 (60.0) |
| OFX | 1 (20.0) | 6 (37.5) | 7 (31.8) | 9 (31.0) | 31 (38.8) |
| MIN | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (2.5) |
| ROX | 5 (100.0) | 16 (100.0) | 20 (90.9) | 28 (96.6) | 73 (91.3) |
| AZM | 5 (100.0) | 16 (100.0) | 20 (90.9) | 28 (96.6) | 73 (91.3) |
| CLR | 5 (100.0) | 15 (93.8) | 21 (95.5) | 28 (96.6) | 69 (86.3) |
| SPA | 2 (40.0) | 6 (37.5) | 7 (31.8) | 8 (27.6) | 25 (31.3) |
| n | 5 | 16 | 22 | 29 | 80 |
Abbreviations: AZM, azithromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLR, clarithromycin; DOX, doxycycline; ERY, erythromycin; JOS, josamycin; LEV, levofloxacin; Mh, Mycoplasma hominis; MIN, minocycline; OFX, ofloxacin; ROX, roxithromycin; SPA, sparfloxacin; TET, tetracycline.
Antimicrobial resistance rate (%) of Uu and Mh co‐infection in patients
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | Case (%) | |
| TET | 11 (22.4) | 30 (28.6) | 32 (23.0) | 46 (28.6) | 119 (24.1) |
| LEV | 28 (57.1) | 56 (53.3) | 77 (55.4) | 102 (63.4) | 295 (59.8) |
| ERY | 49 (100) | 102 (97.1) | 136 (97.8) | 154 (95.7) | 490 (99.4) |
| JOS | 0 (0.0) | 8 (7.6) | 5 (3.6) | 2 (1.2) | 5 (1.0) |
| DOX | 3 (6.1) | 6 (5.7) | 9 (6.5) | 11 (6.8) | 34 (6.9) |
| CIP | 42 (85.7) | 95 (90.5) | 127 (91.4) | 152 (94.4) | 452 (91.7) |
| OFX | 25 (51.0) | 59 (56.2) | 73 (52.5) | 98 (60.9) | 260 (52.7) |
| MIN | 2 (4.1) | 3 (2.9) | 11 (7.9) | 12 (7.5) | 38 (7.7) |
| ROX | 48 (98.0) | 99 (94.3) | 131 (94.2) | 150 (93.2) | 462 (93.7) |
| AZM | 48 (98.0) | 97 (92.4) | 127 (91.4) | 148 (91.9) | 456 (92.5) |
| CLR | 48 (98.0) | 98 (93.3) | 129 (92.8) | 148 (91.9) | 455 (92.3) |
| SPA | 27 (55.1) | 67 (63.8) | 89 (64.0) | 110 (68.3) | 237 (48.1) |
| n | 49 | 105 | 139 | 161 | 493 |
Abbreviations: AZM, azithromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLR, clarithromycin; DOX, doxycycline; ERY, erythromycin; JOS, josamycin; LEV, levofloxacin; Mh, Mycoplasma hominis; MIN, minocycline; OFX, ofloxacin; ROX, roxithromycin; SPA, sparfloxacin; TET, tetracycline; Uu, Ureaplasma urealyticum.
Antimicrobial resistance rate (%) of Uu and Mh infection in patients
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | |
| TET | 271 (6.7) | 37 (5.6) | 19 (14.1) | 1 (5.9) | 223 (25.5) | 15 (21.1) |
| LEV | 233 (5.8) | 24 (3.6) | 60 (44.4) | 3 (17.6) | 527 (60.2) | 31 (43.7) |
| ERY | 629 (15.6) | 42 (6.4) | 123 (91.1) | 10 (58.8) | 850 (97.0) | 61 (85.9) |
| JOS | 6 (0.2) | 2 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) | 17 (1.9) | 3 (4.2) |
| DOX | 174 (4.3) | 25 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 56 (6.4) | 7 (9.9) |
| CIP | 3046 (75.4) | 426 (64.6) | 78 (57.8) | 6 (35.3) | 809 (92.4) | 59 (83.1) |
| OFX | 178 (4.4) | 14 (2.1) | 53 (39.3) | 1 (5.9) | 492 (56.2) | 23 (32.4) |
| MIN | 167 (4.1) | 17 (2.6) | 3 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 62 (7.1) | 4 (5.6) |
| ROX | 265 (6.6) | 29 (4.4) | 130 (96.3) | 12 (70.6) | 832 (95.0) | 58 (81.7) |
| AZM | 125 (3.1) | 11 (1.7) | 129 (95.6) | 13 (76.5) | 816 (93.2) | 60 (84.5) |
| CLR | 116 (2.9) | 9 (1.4) | 125 (92.6) | 13 (76.5) | 818 (93.4) | 60 (84.5) |
| SPA | 616 (15.3) | 20 (3.0) | 47 (34.8) | 1 (5.9) | 517 (59.0) | 13 (18.3) |
| n | 4038 | 660 | 135 | 17 | 876 | 71 |
Abbreviations: AZM, azithromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLR, clarithromycin; DOX, doxycycline; ERY, erythromycin; JOS, josamycin; LEV, levofloxacin; Mh, Mycoplasma hominis; MIN, minocycline; OFX, ofloxacin; ROX, roxithromycin; SPA, sparfloxacin; TET, tetracycline; Uu, Ureaplasma urealyticum.
P < .05.