Literature DB >> 31720918

Knowledge of, and beliefs about, access to screening facilities and cervical cancer screening behaviors among low-income women in New Jersey.

Stephanie A Navarro Silvera1, Elisa V Bandera2,3, Beth A Jones4, Alejandra M Kaplan5, Kitaw Demisse2,3.   

Abstract

Racial/ethnic disparities in cancer outcomes have been well documented. Access to Pap testing may account for some of the variation in the racial and socioeconomic differences in cervical cancer outcomes. Literature exploring perceived access to care as it relates to women of color and low-income women is lacking. The goal of the study was to evaluate and characterize the relationship between what respondents believe about access to free/low-cost screening facilities and screening behaviors among low-income women in New Jersey. We used multivariate logistic regression to investigate belief about access to affordable screening on cancer screening behaviors using data from a cross-sectional study of low-income women in New Jersey (n = 430). Having had a Pap test in the past 3 years was inversely associated with age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) and was positively associated with having had insurance in the previous 2 years (OR 32.48. 95% CI 1.04-5.91), higher perceived risk of cervical cancer (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.29-5.66), and knowing where to go to get a check-up that includes a cancer test (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.49). These results suggest that insurance status continues to be a predictor of screening behavior but also that perceived risk awareness of where to go to get cancer screenings in general may influence the likelihood of utilizing screening, which can be important in developing targeted prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer disparities; Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Health disparities; Human papilloma virus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31720918      PMCID: PMC9083372          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01244-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.532


  26 in total

1.  Access to cervical cancer screening: training internists so skill limitations are not a barrier to care.

Authors:  Pamela Charney
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Mona Shah; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  The self-reported likelihood of patient delay in breast cancer: new thoughts for early detection.

Authors:  Noreen C Facione; Christine Miaskowski; Marylin J Dodd; Steven M Paul
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2003, featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/Latino populations.

Authors:  Holly L Howe; Xiaocheng Wu; Lynn A G Ries; Vilma Cokkinides; Faruque Ahmed; Ahmedin Jemal; Barry Miller; Melanie Williams; Elizabeth Ward; Phyllis A Wingo; Amelie Ramirez; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) - United States, 2004-2006.

Authors:  S Jane Henley; Jessica B King; Robert R German; Lisa C Richardson; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2010-11-26

7.  Addressing social determinants of health to improve access to early breast cancer detection: results of the Boston REACH 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition Women's Health Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Cheryl R Clark; Nashira Baril; Marycarmen Kunicki; Natacha Johnson; Jane Soukup; Kathleen Ferguson; Stuart Lipsitz; JudyAnn Bigby
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Explaining the race difference in prostate cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Wen-Liang Liu; Andre B Araujo; Stanislav V Kasl; Stephanie N Silvera; Hosanna Soler-Vilá; Mary G M Curnen; Robert Dubrow
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women.

Authors:  Kelly Ackerson; Kimberlee Gretebeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2007-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceived Financial Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Cost Burden Among Low-Income, Under-Screened Women.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Lisa P Spees; Jennifer S Smith; Noel T Brewer; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Lynn Barclay; Sarah Jackson; Erin E Kent; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.