| Literature DB >> 31720875 |
Eva Travnickova1, Premysl Mikula1,2, Jakub Oprsal3, Marie Bohacova3, Lubomir Kubac4, Dusan Kimmer5, Jana Soukupova6, Michal Bittner7.
Abstract
We developed a simple and fast microplate assay for evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of electrospun nanofiber filtration membranes or similar porous materials for water treatment technologies. Resazurin (alamarBlue®) was used as an indicator of the amount of viable experimental microorganisms Gram-negative Escherichia coli, Gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis, and natural wastewater treatment plant effluent bacteria. A bacterial inoculum of concentration 1-3 × 105 CFU mL-1 was pipetted onto the surface of assessed both functionalized and respective control membranes and incubated in 12-well plates for 4 h at 37 °C. Kinetics of resazurin metabolization, i.e. its reduction to fluorescent resorufin, was evaluated fluorimetrically (λex520/λem590 nm). A number of viable bacteria on the membranes expressed as CFU mL-1 was calculated from the kinetic curves by using calibration curves that were constructed for both experimental bacterial species. Antimicrobial activities of the membranes were evaluated by either resazurin assay or modified ISO 20743 plate count assay. Results of both assays showed the significant antimicrobial activity of membranes functionalized with silver nanoparticles for both bacterial species and wastewater treatment plant effluent bacteria as well (log CFU reduction compared to control membrane > 4), while membranes containing specific quaternary ammonium salts were inefficient (log CFU reduction < 1). The suitability of resazurin microplate assay for testing nanofiber filtration membranes and analogous matrices has proven to be a faster and less demanding alternative to the traditionally used approach providing comparable results.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Electrospun nanofiber filtration membranes; Quaternary ammonium salts; Resazurin; Silver nanoparticles
Year: 2019 PMID: 31720875 PMCID: PMC6854189 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0909-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Chemical structure of QAS used for membrane functionalization
Fig. 2Kinetics of resazurin metabolization in bacterial suspensions of E. coli (a) and E. faecalis (b) having various bacterial concentrations. Values represent the mean ± SD of hexaplicate determinations. The figure shows a set of results of one experimental run as an example of three analogous independent experiments for both bacterial species
Fig. 3Calibration curves describing the relationship between the concentration of the bacteria in the wells and the rate of resazurin metabolization. Depicted results are T2000 values compiled from the three independent experiments for both E. coli and E. faecalis. Dotted lines depict confidence intervals with a confidence level of 95%. T2000 values under the LOQ level (i.e. 103 CFU mL−1) are not depicted in the graph
Fig. 4Resazurin metabolization curves for E. coli (a), E. faecalis (b), and WWTP effluent (c) incubated with various membranes on PP, VS and MFRF supporting layers. Terms “Bacteria alone” and “WWTP effl. alone” mean pure inoculum incubated without a membrane. Values represent the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. This figure shows a set of results of one experimental run as an example of three analogous independent experiments for either E. coli, E. faecalis or WWTP effluent
Number of bacteria (log CFU mL−1) and antibacterial activity (A) of QAS- and AgNPs-functionalized membranes on supporting layers (MFRF, VS, PP) and their respective non-functionalized control membranes
| WWTP effluent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resazurin assay | Plate count assay | Resazurin assay | Plate count assay | Resazurin assay | ||||||
| log CFU mL−1 ± SD | log CFU mL−1 | log CFU mL−1 ± SD | log CFU mL−1 | log CFUEEQ mL−1 ± SD | ||||||
| QAS-MFRF | 8.06 ± 0.55 | 0.01 | 8.02 | 0.76 | < LOQ | < 1 | 5.3 | 0.54 | 4.60 ± 1.13 | 0.31 |
| PU-MFRF | 8.07 ± 0.36 | 8.67 | < LOQ | 5.22 | 4.91 ± 0.71 | |||||
| QAS-VS | 9.13 ± 0.80 | − 0.35 | 8.52 | − 0.08 | 7.11 ± 0.63 | 0.25 | 7.09 | 0.36 | 6.49 ± 0.25 | 0.40 |
| PU-VS | 8.78 ± 0.64 | 8.44 | 7.36 ± 0.35 | 7.45 | 6.79 ± 0.22 | |||||
| QAS-PP | 9.68 ± 0.41 | 0.02 | 8.48 | 0.03 | 7.94 ± 0.06 | 0.02 | 7.71 | 0.49 | 7.63 ± 0.46 | 0.11 |
| PU-PP | 9.70 ± 0.27 | 8.51 | 7.96 ± 0.11 | 8.19 | 7.74 ± 0.44 | |||||
| AgNPs-PP | < LOQ | > 6.70 | 3.27 | 5.24 | < LOQ | > 4.96 | 3.45 | 4.63 | < LOQ | > 4.74 |
| PU-PP | 9.70 ± 0.27 | 8.51 | 7.96 ± 0.11 | 8.19 | 7.74 ± 0.44 | |||||
| Inoculum w/o membr. | 9.95 ± 0.02 | – | – | – | 7.98 ± 0.25 | – | – | – | 7.72 ± 0.32 | – |
A was determined either by resazurin microplate assay or the plate count assay. A was calculated from Eq. 1 for resazurin assay and Eq. 2 for plate count assay and expressed as log CFU reduction compared to respective non-functionalized control membrane. A number of bacteria in the WWTP effluent sample was calculated from the E. coli calibration curve, therefore membrane A against WWTP effluent microbial community was expressed as a reduction of log CFUEEQ mL−1