| Literature DB >> 31720093 |
Qiang Xiao1, Yang Xiao2, Ying Luo1, Changsu Song3, Jiacheng Bi4.
Abstract
Afforestation is a key approach used to effectively prevent ecosystem degradation, which in itself is a key reason for the obstruction of sustainable societal development. In order to suppress sand and dust storms as a result of ecological environmental degradation in North China, the Government of China has sanctioned the planting of a large number of trees in Inner Mongolia. However, water resources in the Inner Mongolian Plateau are insufficient to sustain this effort because such a large number of trees consume a large amount of water, which also significantly increases evapotranspiration. This study uses spatiotemporal trend analyses and abrupt change analyses to determine the effects of afforestation on water resource variations in the Inner Mongolian Plateau. Results show that even though water resources in Inner Mongolia fluctuate, this resource has generally exhibited a declining trend from 1980 to 2015, corresponding to the NDVI trend. On spatial-temporal scales, water resources decreased significantly in the eastern section of the plateau, especially in the Horqin District and the Hulunbuir Plateau. By contrast, water resources increased as a whole in the western section of the plateau (Alxa Plateau). Driving analysis results show that water resource variation is mainly due to the contribution of change in precipitation (positive effect), which accounted for 39.35% of total changes in water resources, followed by the evapotranspiration (negative effect). In other words, afforestation with the primary aim of improving ecosystem has effectually upset the water resource balance of Inner Mongolia Plateau. ©2019 Xiao et al.Entities:
Keywords: Afforestation; Drought; Evapotranspiration; Inner Mongolian Plateau; Water resource
Year: 2019 PMID: 31720093 PMCID: PMC6842297 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Location and ecosystem distribution map of China’s Inner Mongolian region.
Figure 2Typical area characteristics of the research area.
(A) Natural environmental characteristics of grassland ecosystem in the Tongliao region, where the wind is powerful enough to be suitable for wind power generation. (B) Local government planting water-intensive plantations in Hohhot to increase vegetation coverage.
Figure 3Validation of water resource results from 1998 to 2015.
Figure 4Interannual variations of water resources (A), NDVI (B), evapotranspiration (C), precipitation (D), temperature (E), plantation area (F).
The description of statistics of the various driving factors and water resources from 1980 to 2015.
| Mean | Maximum | Minimum | Standard error | Coefficient of variance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water resource | 36.19 | 125.65 | 4.04 | 25.58 | 0.71 |
| NDVI | 299.93 | 417.83 | 229.68 | 42.13 | 0.14 |
| Evapotranspiration | 3.75 | 5.45 | 2.25 | 0.71 | 0.19 |
| Precpitation | 283.83 | 309.81 | 258.77 | 11.08 | 0.04 |
| Temperature | 252.79 | 266.43 | 244.21 | 5.73 | 0.02 |
| Afforestation | 591.67 | 907.39 | 256.52 | 170.56 | 0.29 |
Figure 5Change trends and abrupt change tests of water resources in the Mongolian Plateau.
The correlation analysis on relationship among the various driving factors and water resources.
| Water resource | Precipitation | Temperature | Evapotranspiration | DEM | Slope | Village | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water resource | 1 | ||||||
| Precipitation | 0.78 | 1 | |||||
| Temperature | 0.04 | 0.21 | 1 | ||||
| Evapotranspiration | −0.49 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 1 | |||
| DEM | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.50 | −0.03 | 1 | ||
| Slope | 0.09 | −0.23 | −0.34 | −0.50 | −0.06 | 1 | |
| Village | −0.14 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.20 | −0.03 | 0.10 | 1 |
Regression results of relationships between the various driving factors and water resources after normalization. Contributions (%) represent the proportion of the total change in water resources accounted for by a given driving factor (Standard coefficient/Total absolute value of Standard coefficient).
| Adjusted | Contribution (%) | Standard coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precipitation | 0.61 | 0.609 | 39.35 | 0.781 |
| Temperature | 0.001 | −0.001 | 1.81 | 0.036 |
| Evapotranspiration | 0.236 | 0.235 | −24.48 | −0.486 |
| DEM | 0.204 | 0.202 | 22.72 | 0.451 |
| Slope | 0.008 | 0.006 | 4.53 | 0.090 |
| Village | 0.02 | 0.018 | −7.10 | −0.141 |
Notes.
R2 is the regression goodness of fit based on the value of each driving factor. Parameters with significant contributions to regressions were identified by repeated measures ANOVA.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.