K V Anitha1, N Gopi Chander2, V Karthikeyan3, Ram Hariharasudan3. 1. Reader (Prosthodontics), SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India. 2. Professor (Prosthodontics), SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India. 3. Post Graduate Resident (Prosthodontics), SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of hemi-maxillectomy defects is difficult and challenging when there is displacement of obturator prosthesis. The literature lacks data on the displacement of different types of obturators. The intent of the study was to evaluate the differences in displacement between the single and two piece hollow bulb obturator prosthesis in Aramany Class I maxillectomy defect. METHODS: Finite element (FE) model of Aramany Class I maxillectomy defect restored with single and two piece closed bulb obturator was fabricated based on patient computed tomography (CT) scan. Finite element analysis (FEA) with three different load applications was done to measure the displacement of the obturator. Graphical and numerical values of displacement were obtained and the results were tabulated. RESULTS: The results were obtained as displacement colour images and the numerical displacement values. The displacement of two piece obturator was 4.779e-8, 6.372e-8, 7.965e-8 compared to single piece obturator 4.509e-8, 6.012e-8, and 7.5151e-8. There was marginal numerical increase in magnitude of displacement in two piece obturator compared to single piece obturator. CONCLUSION: The study observed no significant difference in displacement between the obturator. The numerical difference in displacement is more in two piece obturator compared to the single piece obturator.
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of hemi-maxillectomy defects is difficult and challenging when there is displacement of obturator prosthesis. The literature lacks data on the displacement of different types of obturators. The intent of the study was to evaluate the differences in displacement between the single and two piece hollow bulb obturator prosthesis in Aramany Class I maxillectomy defect. METHODS: Finite element (FE) model of Aramany Class I maxillectomy defect restored with single and two piece closed bulb obturator was fabricated based on patient computed tomography (CT) scan. Finite element analysis (FEA) with three different load applications was done to measure the displacement of the obturator. Graphical and numerical values of displacement were obtained and the results were tabulated. RESULTS: The results were obtained as displacement colour images and the numerical displacement values. The displacement of two piece obturator was 4.779e-8, 6.372e-8, 7.965e-8 compared to single piece obturator 4.509e-8, 6.012e-8, and 7.5151e-8. There was marginal numerical increase in magnitude of displacement in two piece obturator compared to single piece obturator. CONCLUSION: The study observed no significant difference in displacement between the obturator. The numerical difference in displacement is more in two piece obturator compared to the single piece obturator.
Authors: Mohammed A Mousa; Johari Yap Abdullah; Nafij B Jamayet; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Adam Husein Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 3.411