| Literature DB >> 31719557 |
Song Lin1, Tao Gao2, Chongxiu Sun1, Mengru Jia1, Chengxia Liu2, Xingbin Ma2, Aiguo Ma3.
Abstract
Atrophy gastritis harbor a high risk for the development of dysplasia and gastric cancer. The study investigated the relationships of specific dietary patterns and endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 574 consecutive outpatients who were diagnosed as chronic gastritis according to endoscopic examination. Dietary intakes of study individuals was assessed using the semi-quantitative food group frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between dietary patterns and endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 574 participants were included, 286 with endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy. Three dietary patterns were identified by factor analysis. "Alcohol and fish" (tertile 1 vs. tertile 3: adjusted odds ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.22) and "coarse cereals" (tertile 1 vs. tertile 3: adjusted odds ratio = 2.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.39) were associated with an increased risk for endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy but a "traditional" pattern was not. Dietary pattern was not associated with gastric mucosal atrophy in women or in participants with H. pylori infection. A high adherence to both "Alcohol and Fish" and "Coarse cereals" dietary patterns seem to be associated with higher odds of endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy in men and in patients without H. pylori infection. Further prospective cohort studies needed to confirm these findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31719557 PMCID: PMC6851133 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52951-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of the screening process of the selection of eligible participants.
General characteristics of participants by having or not having endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy.
| Variablesa | Participants with endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy n = 286 (49.8%) | Participants without endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy n = 288 (50.2%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.551 | ||
| Male | 162 (56.6%) | 156 (54.2%) | |
| Female | 124 (43.4%) | 132 (45.8%) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| 18–44 | 52 (18.2%) | 154 (53.5%) | |
| 45–54 | 109 (38.1%) | 88 (30.6%) | |
| ≥55 | 125 (43.7%) | 46 (16.0%) | |
| BMI, kg/mb | 24.1 ± 3.46 | 23.4 ± 3.64 | 0.020 |
|
| 0.606 | ||
| Urban | 84 (29.4%) | 79 (27.4%) | |
| Rural | 202 (70.6%) | 209 (72.6%) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| <6 | 80 (28.0%) | 54 (18.8%) | |
| 6–12 | 171 (59.8%) | 165 (57.3%) | |
| >12 | 35 (12.2%) | 69 (24.0%) | |
|
| |||
| Single/Divorced/Widowed | 4 (1.4%) | 12 (4.2%) | 0.044 |
| Married | 282 (99.6%) | 276 (95.8%) | |
|
| 0.001 | ||
| Authority unit | 39 (13.6%) | 52 (18.1%) | |
| Company employee | 12 (4.2%) | 18 (6.3%) | |
| Worker | 39 (13.6%) | 46 (16.0%) | |
| Self-employer | 41 (14.3%) | 61 (21.2%) | |
| Student | 2 (0.7%) | 10 (3.5%) | |
| Farmer | 141 (49.3%) | 93 (32.3%) | |
| Retried | 12 (4.2%) | 8 (2.8%) | |
|
| 0.007 | ||
| <1000 | 67 (23.4%) | 57 (19.8%) | |
| 1001–3000 | 110 (38.5%) | 84 (29.2%) | |
| >3000 | 109 (38.1%) | 147 (51.0%) | |
|
| 0.455 | ||
| Yes | 133 (46.5%) | 125 (43.4%) | |
| No | 153 (53.5%) | 163 (56.6%) | |
|
| 0.474 | ||
| Yes | 78 (27.3%) | 71 (24.7%) | |
| No | 208 (72.7%) | 217 (75.3%) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 109 (38.4%) | 55 (19.2%) | |
| No | 175 (61.6%) | 231 (80.8%) | |
|
| |||
| Yes | 19 (6.6%) | 13 (4.5%) | 0.266 |
| No | 267 (93.4%) | 275 (95.5%) | |
|
| 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 49 (17.1%) | 22 (7.6%) | |
| No | 237 (82.9%) | 266 (92.4%) | |
|
| 0.015 | ||
| Yes | 22 (7.7%) | 9 (3.1%) | |
| No | 264 (92.3%) | 279 (96.9%) | |
|
| 1804.3 ± 719.7 | 1830.8 ± 706.1 | 0.868 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CNY, Chinese yuan.
aValues presented as percentage for categorical variables and mean ± SD for continuous variables.
bChi-square test was used to compare the percentage between participants with or without endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy. Student’s t-test analyses was used to compare the mean values between participants with or without endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy.
cFrom 180 individuals (89 participants with endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy, 91 participants without endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy).
Principal component analysis of 23 food groups.
| Food groups | Alcohol and fish | Traditional | Coarse cereals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh water fish | 0.74 | — | — |
| Sea fish | 0.73 | — | — |
| Wine | 0.68 | — | — |
| Beer | 0.65 | — | — |
| Legumes | — | — | 0.41 |
| Tea | — | — | — |
| Poultry | — | — | 0.46 |
| Red meat | — | 0.50 | — |
| Sugar-sweetened beverage | — | — | — |
| Potatoes | — | — | — |
| Vegetables | — | 0.73 | — |
| Fruits | — | — | — |
| Lard oil | — | — | — |
| Egg | — | — | — |
| Salted vegetables | — | — | — |
| Soya-bean oil | —— | — | — |
| Coarse cereals | — | — | 0.71 |
| Dairy and its product | — | — | — |
| Cooked wheaten food | — | 0.72 | — |
| Processed meat | — | — | — |
| Corn oil | — | — | — |
| Peanut oil | — | — | — |
| Cooked rice food | — | — | — |
| Percent of variance explained (%) | 10.30% | 7.27% | 6.88% |
Factor loading > 0.4 are listed.
General characteristics of the study participants cross categories of dietary patterns scores.
| Variablesa | Alcohol and fish |
| Traditional |
| Coarse cereals |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (191) | T2 (190) | T3 (193) | T1 (191) | T2 (190) | T3 (193) | T1 (191) | T2 (190) | T3 (193) | ||||
|
| 39.8 | 48.4 | 77.0 | <0.001 | 34.7 | 51.0 | 80.2 | <0.001 | 57.1 | 46.8 | 62.2 | 0.009 |
|
| 0.372 | 0.011 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| 18–44 | 30.9 | 35.8 | 40.9 | 27.4 | 37.5 | 42.7 | 29.3 | 32.1 | 46.1 | |||
| 45–54 | 37.2 | 34.7 | 31.1 | 34.7 | 35.4 | 32.8 | 39.3 | 40.5 | 23.3 | |||
| ≥55 | 31.9 | 29.5 | 28.0 | 37.9 | 27.1 | 24.5 | 31.4 | 27.4 | 30.6 | |||
|
| 23.5 ± 3.7 | 23.5 ± 3.5 | 24.2 ± 3.5 | 0.056 | 23.9 ± 3.7 | 23.1 ± 3.3 | 24.2 ± 3.6 | 0.012 | 23.8 ± 3.5 | 23.4 ± 3.5 | 24.0 ± 3.7 | 0.328 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.596 | 0.033 | |||||||||
| Urban | 20.9 | 23.7 | 40.4 | 31.1 | 26.6 | 27.6 | 24.1 | 25.8 | 35.2 | |||
| Rural | 79.1 | 76.3 | 59.6 | 68.9 | 73.4 | 72.4 | 75.9 | 74.2 | 64.8 | |||
|
| <0.001 | 0.03 | <0.001 | |||||||||
| <6 | 29.8 | 23.7 | 16.6 | 30.5 | 22.9 | 16.7 | 31.4 | 21.6 | 17.1 | |||
| 6–12 | 59.2 | 61.1 | 55.4 | 51.6 | 59.4 | 64.6 | 56.5 | 64.7 | 54.4 | |||
| >12 | 11.0 | 15.3 | 28.0 | 17.9 | 17.7 | 18.8 | 12.0 | 13.7 | 28.5 | |||
|
| 0.783 | 0.931 | 0.144 | |||||||||
| Single/Divorced/Widowed | 3.1 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 4.7 | |||
| Married | 96.9 | 97.9 | 96.9 | 96.8 | 97.4 | 97.4 | 98.4 | 97.9 | 95.3 | |||
|
| <0.001 | 0.718 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| Authority unit | 11.5 | 10.5 | 25.4 | 15.3 | 14.6 | 17.7 | 9.4 | 14.2 | 23.8 | |||
| Company employee | 1.6 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 4.1 | |||
| Worker | 14.1 | 17.4 | 13.0 | 15.3 | 15.6 | 13.5 | 15.2 | 12.6 | 16.6 | |||
| Self-employer | 11.0 | 22.1 | 20.2 | 14.2 | 17.2 | 21.9 | 16.8 | 17.4 | 19.2 | |||
| Student | 3.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 2.6 | |||
| Farmer | 53.4 | 39.5 | 29.5 | 43.7 | 41.7 | 37.0 | 50.8 | 42.6 | 29.0 | |||
| Retried | 4.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 4.7 | |||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| <1000 | 31.9 | 21.6 | 11.4 | 34.2 | 20.3 | 10.4 | 26.2 | 19.5 | 19.2 | |||
| 1001–3000 | 36.1 | 37.9 | 27.5 | 27.4 | 39.1 | 34.9 | 37.7 | 40.0 | 23.8 | |||
| >3000 | 31.9 | 40.5 | 61.1 | 38.4 | 40.6 | 54.7 | 36.1 | 40.5 | 57.0 | |||
|
| 38.7 | 36.8 | 59.1 | <0.001 | 36.3 | 43.8 | 54.7 | 0.001 | 41.9 | 41.1 | 51.8 | 0.062 |
|
| 6.8 | 13.7 | 57.0 | <0.001 | 11.6 | 21.9 | 44.3 | <0.001 | 27.2 | 20.5 | 30.1 | 0.093 |
|
| 30.9 | 23.9 | 31.4 | 0.201 | 27.1 | 25.1 | 34.0 | 0.131 | 24.2 | 27.1 | 34.9 | 0.058 |
|
| 6.8 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 0.083 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 0.07 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 6.7 | 0.674 |
|
| 7.9 | 13.7 | 15.5 | 0.058 | 16.8 | 9.9 | 10.4 | 0.072 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 15.0 | 0.388 |
|
| 3.7 | 4.2 | 8.3 | 0.09 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 6.3 | 0.791 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 0.346 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CNY, Chinese yuan.
aValues presented as percentage for categorical variables and mean ± SD for continuous variables.
bChi-square test for categorical variables and the ANOVA analyses for continuous variables.
Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy across tertiles of dietary patterns’ scores.
| Cases/non-casesa | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.02 | 0.041 | 0.040 | ||||
| Tertile 1 (low) | 91/100 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Tertile 2 | 87/103 | 0.95 (0.61–1.48) | 0.98 (0.62–1.56) | 1.04 (0.64–1.68) | |||
| Tertile 3 (high) | 108/85 | 1.78 (1.11–2.86)* | 1.83 (1.07–3.13)* | 1.85 (1.06–3.22)* | |||
|
| 0.404 | 0.62 | 0.969 | ||||
| Tertile 1 (low) | 98/92 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Tertile 2 | 93/99 | 1.09 (0.69–1.70) | 1.12 (0.70–1.77) | 1.16 (0.72–1.87) | |||
| Tertile 3 (high) | 95/97 | 1.23 (0.76–1.99) | 1.14 (0.68–1.89) | 1.00 (0.59–1.70) | |||
|
| 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.005 | ||||
| Tertile 1 (low) | 87/104 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Tertile 2 | 96/94 | 1.44 (0.93–2.25) | 1.54 (0.97–2.45) | 1.55 (0.96–2.50) | |||
| Tertile 3 (high) | 103/90 | 1.95 (1.24–3.07)* | 2.22 (1.37–3.60)* | 2.05 (1.24–3.39)* |
aCases with gastric mucosal atrophy/non-cases in tertiles.
Model 1: adjusted for age and gender.
Model 2: further adjusted for year of education, residence, marital status, occupation, income, BMI (body mass index), smoking and drinking.
Model 3: further adjusted for H. pylori infection, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of taking anticoagulants and total energy intake.
*p < 0.05.