Irene C Huffnagel1, Wouter J C van Ballegoij1, Johanna M B W Vos1, Stephan Kemp1, Matthan W A Caan1, Marc Engelen2. 1. From the Department of Paediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital (I.C.H., W.J.C.v.B., J.M.B.W.V., M.E.), Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases (S.K.), and Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics (M.W.A.C.), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. From the Department of Paediatric Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital (I.C.H., W.J.C.v.B., J.M.B.W.V., M.E.), Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases (S.K.), and Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics (M.W.A.C.), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.engelen@amsterdamumc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine the potential of diffusion MRI (dMRI) of the cervical spinal cord and the corticospinal tracts in brain as surrogate outcome measure for progression of myelopathy in men with adrenoleukodystrophy, as better outcome measures to quantify progression of myelopathy would enable clinical trials with fewer patients and shorter follow-up. METHODS: Clinical assessment of myelopathy included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Severity Scoring System for Progressive Myelopathy (SSPROM), Timed Up-and-Go, and 6-Minute Walk Test. Applied dMRI metrics included fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. RESULTS: Data were available for 33 controls and 52 patients. First, cross-sectionally, differences between groups (controls vs patients; controls vs asymptomatic patients vs symptomatic patients) were statistically significant for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and radial diffusivity in spinal cord and brain corticospinal tracts (effect size 0.31-0.68). Correlations between dMRI metrics and clinical measures were moderate to strong (correlation coefficient 0.35-0.60). Second, longitudinally (n = 36), change on clinical measures was significant after 2-year follow-up for EDSS, SSPROM, and Timed Up-and-Go (p ≤ 0.021, effect size ≤0.14). Change on brain fractional anisotropy and radial diffusivity was slightly larger (p ≤ 0.002, effect sizes 0.16-0.28). In addition, a statistically significant change was detectable in asymptomatic patients using brain dMRI and not using the clinical measures. Change on clinical measures did not correlate to change on dMRI metrics. CONCLUSION: Although effect sizes were small, our prospective data illustrate the potential of dMRI as surrogate outcome measure for progression of myelopathy in men with adrenoleukodystrophy.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine the potential of diffusion MRI (dMRI) of the cervical spinal cord and the corticospinal tracts in brain as surrogate outcome measure for progression of myelopathy in men with adrenoleukodystrophy, as better outcome measures to quantify progression of myelopathy would enable clinical trials with fewer patients and shorter follow-up. METHODS: Clinical assessment of myelopathy included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Severity Scoring System for Progressive Myelopathy (SSPROM), Timed Up-and-Go, and 6-Minute Walk Test. Applied dMRI metrics included fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. RESULTS: Data were available for 33 controls and 52 patients. First, cross-sectionally, differences between groups (controls vs patients; controls vs asymptomatic patients vs symptomatic patients) were statistically significant for fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and radial diffusivity in spinal cord and brain corticospinal tracts (effect size 0.31-0.68). Correlations between dMRI metrics and clinical measures were moderate to strong (correlation coefficient 0.35-0.60). Second, longitudinally (n = 36), change on clinical measures was significant after 2-year follow-up for EDSS, SSPROM, and Timed Up-and-Go (p ≤ 0.021, effect size ≤0.14). Change on brain fractional anisotropy and radial diffusivity was slightly larger (p ≤ 0.002, effect sizes 0.16-0.28). In addition, a statistically significant change was detectable in asymptomatic patients using brain dMRI and not using the clinical measures. Change on clinical measures did not correlate to change on dMRI metrics. CONCLUSION: Although effect sizes were small, our prospective data illustrate the potential of dMRI as surrogate outcome measure for progression of myelopathy in men with adrenoleukodystrophy.
Authors: Julien Cohen-Adad; Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Mihael Abramovic; Carina Arneitz; Nicole Atcheson; Laura Barlow; Robert L Barry; Markus Barth; Marco Battiston; Christian Büchel; Matthew Budde; Virginie Callot; Anna J E Combes; Benjamin De Leener; Maxime Descoteaux; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Marek Dostál; Julien Doyon; Adam Dvorak; Falk Eippert; Karla R Epperson; Kevin S Epperson; Patrick Freund; Jürgen Finsterbusch; Alexandru Foias; Michela Fratini; Issei Fukunaga; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Giancarlo Germani; Guillaume Gilbert; Federico Giove; Charley Gros; Francesco Grussu; Akifumi Hagiwara; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Tomáš Horák; Masaaki Hori; James Joers; Kouhei Kamiya; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Miloš Keřkovský; Ali Khatibi; Joo-Won Kim; Nawal Kinany; Hagen Kitzler; Shannon Kolind; Yazhuo Kong; Petr Kudlička; Paul Kuntke; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Slawomir Kusmia; René Labounek; Maria Marcella Laganà; Cornelia Laule; Christine S Law; Christophe Lenglet; Tobias Leutritz; Yaou Liu; Sara Llufriu; Sean Mackey; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Loan Mattera; Igor Nestrasil; Kristin P O'Grady; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Papp; Deborah Pareto; Todd B Parrish; Anna Pichiecchio; Ferran Prados; Àlex Rovira; Marc J Ruitenberg; Rebecca S Samson; Giovanni Savini; Maryam Seif; Alan C Seifert; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Zachary A Smith; Elisabeth Solana; Yuichi Suzuki; George Tackley; Alexandra Tinnermann; Jan Valošek; Dimitri Van De Ville; Marios C Yiannakas; Kenneth A Weber; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Richard G Wise; Patrik O Wyss; Junqian Xu Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 17.021
Authors: Wouter J C van Ballegoij; Stephanie I W van de Stadt; Irene C Huffnagel; Stephan Kemp; Marjo S van der Knaap; Marc Engelen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: René Labounek; Jan Valošek; Tomáš Horák; Alena Svátková; Petr Bednařík; Lubomír Vojtíšek; Magda Horáková; Igor Nestrašil; Christophe Lenglet; Julien Cohen-Adad; Josef Bednařík; Petr Hluštík Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Isabelle Weinhofer; Paulus Rommer; Bettina Zierfuss; Patrick Altmann; Martha Foiani; Amanda Heslegrave; Henrik Zetterberg; Andreas Gleiss; Patricia L Musolino; Yi Gong; Sonja Forss-Petter; Thomas Berger; Florian Eichler; Patrick Aubourg; Wolfgang Köhler; Johannes Berger Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 14.919