| Literature DB >> 31717693 |
E Cheng1, Ben Xing1, Shanshan Li1,2,3, Chengzhuang Yu1,2, Junwei Li4,5, Chunyang Wei1,2, Cheng Cheng6.
Abstract
The microelectrode is an essential and vital part in microsensors that are largely used in industrial, chemical, and biological applications. To obtain desired microelectrodes in great quality, it is also of great necessity and significance to develop a robust method to fabricate the microelectrode pattern. This work developed a four-terminal differential microelectrode that aims at recognizing microparticles in fluids. This microelectrode pair consisted of a high height-width ratio microelectrode array fabricated using a pre-designed microelectrode pattern (a micro-scale channel) and melted liquid metal. The surface treatment of microelectrodes was also investigated to reveal its impacts on the continuality of melting metal and the quality of the fabricated microelectrode patterns. To evaluate the performance of micro-casting fabricated electrodes, a microfluidic device was packaged using a microelectrode layer and a flow layer. Then impedance cytometer experiments were performed using sample fluids with polymer particles in two different sizes in diameter (5 μm and 10 μm). In addition, engine oil was tested on the microelectrodes as complex samples. The number of abrasive particles in the engine oil can be collected from the developed microfluidic device for further analysis.Entities:
Keywords: differential amplifier; impedance cytometer; melting metal; microfabrication; surface pretreatment; wear particle detection
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717693 PMCID: PMC6888546 DOI: 10.3390/ma12223710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The procedures to fabricate the high height–width ratio electrodes. (a) Preparation of PDMS microfluidic channels. A SU8 mold was firstly lithographed, and then a PDMS layer with a patterned channel was peeled off as the mold for the micro electrodes. (b) surface treatment of inner walls of the microfluidic channel walls. (c) reversable bonding of the PDMS channel with a glass slider; melting and micro-casting within the microchannels. (d) In-reversable bonding of the metal-in-PDMS electrode and glass slider.
Figure 2Effect of the surface treatment on the micro-casting fabrication performance. (a) The patterned PDMS microchannel as the casting mold; (b) the microchannel failed to be completely filled with the melting metal if the inner wall was not treated with surfactant; (c) the metal-in-PDMS electrode pattern layer failed to be peeled off from the glass substrate if the inner wall was not treated with surfactant; (d) the microchannel was completely filled with the melting metal, if the inner wall was well treated; (e) the metal-in-PDMS electrode pattern layer was peeled off from the glass substrate, if the inner wall was well treated with surfactant.
Figure 3Effect of the inlet dimensions on the micro-casting fabrication performance. (a) The PDMS microchannel as the casting mold; (b) the appearance of the designed pattern border of the inlet and punched hole; (c) the microchannel failed to be filled with the melting metal with an inlet size of 1 mm; (d) the microchannel filled with melting metal with the inlet size of 0.6 mm.
Figure 4The microfluidic device used in the experiments for particle counting applications.
Figure 5The experimental results of latex particle counting applications as a proof of concept. (a) The real-time current signal obtained from the impedance analyzer. (b) Real-time current signals processed by a customized filter. Here, the signals smaller than the threshold were cut off as zero. (c) The current signal response of 10 μm particles. (d) The current signal response of 5 μm particles.
Figure 6Experimental results of abrasive grains detection. Both (a) and (b) provide an example of abrasive grain detection. (a) The real-time current signal obtained from the impedance analyzer. (b) Real-time current signal processed by a customized filter. Here, the signals smaller than the In (the threshold current to distinguish the particle signals from background noise) were cut off as zero. Both (c) and (d) present the distribution of abrasive grains in the oil, obtained by the commercial equipment and the device fabricated in this work.