| Literature DB >> 31717349 |
Marta Vazquez-Gomez1, Ana Heras-Molina2, Consolacion Garcia-Contreras2, Jose Luis Pesantez-Pacheco2,3, Laura Torres-Rovira2, Beatriz Martinez-Fernandez4, Jorge Gonzalez4, Teresa Encinas1, Susana Astiz2, Cristina Ovilo2, Beatriz Isabel1, Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes1,2.
Abstract
Maternal supplementation with the polyphenol hydroxytyrosol in a swine model of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) improves the fetal oxidative status, decreases the appearance of low birth-weight neonates and favors growth during early postnatal stages (lactation). The current study aimed to determine whether hydroxytyrosol supplementation can also improve developmental patterns, metabolic traits, and body composition of the offspring during later postnatal stages (from weaning to adulthood). A total of 21 piglets born from control untreated sows and 20 piglets born from sows treated with hydroxytyrosol during the last two-thirds of pregnancy were selected on the basis of similar body weights at weaning, for avoiding any interfering effects occurred during lactation. The pigs in the treated group had higher average daily weight gain (ADWG) and, therefore, reached higher body weight and corpulence, greater muscle development and higher adiposity than their control counterparts. The following were not found: significant effects on metabolism and body composition except changes in the muscular fatty acid composition of the treated pigs coming from the largest litters; those more affected by IUGR processes. These findings suggest that maternal supplementation with hydroxytyrosol may improve juvenile development of offspring in at-risk pregnancies and pave the way for more specific studies aiming to elucidate effects on adiposity, metabolism, and meat organoleptic characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; intrauterine growth restriction; litter-size; pregnancy; swine model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717349 PMCID: PMC6912388 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8110535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Histological images of muscle (left) and adipocytes (right). Hematoxylin-eosin, 100×, bar 200 µm.
Figure 2Mean values (± S.E.M.) of (A) body weight and (B) average daily weight gain (ADWG) from weaning at 25 days-old to 180 days-old in pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol during pregnancy (groups HT, grey line, and C, black line, respectively). Asterisks denote significant differences between groups (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01).
Figure 3Highlight of significant differences between pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol during pregnancy (groups HT, grey line, and C, black line, respectively) in the mean values (± S.E.M.) of the thoracic and abdominal circumferences respectively (A) and (B), for pigs from litters of small size (< 8 piglets), the occipito-nasal length (C) from weaning at 25 days-old to 180 days-old. Asterisks indicate significant differences between groups (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01).
Figure 4Highlight of significant differences between pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol during pregnancy (groups HT, grey line, and C, black line, respectively) in the mean values (± S.E.M.) of the diameter of the longissimus dorsi (LD, panel (A) and, for piglets from litters of large size (≥ 8 piglets), the thickness of total and inner-layer back fat (panels (B) and (C), respectively) from weaning at 25 days-old to 180 days-old. Asterisks indicate significant differences between groups (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01).
Mean values (± S.E.M.) of body weight, thoracic and abdominal circumferences, thickness of both total subcutaneous back fat and its inner layer, and diameter of longissimus dorsi (LD) in 180 days-old pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol (groups HT and C, respectively). All values are significantly different between treatments (p < 0.05 for all).
| Variable | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| C | HT | |
| Body weight (kg) | 44.9 ± 3.0 | 54.1 ± 4.9 |
| Thoracic circumference (cm) | 83.3 ± 2.0 | 88.6 ± 2.9 |
| Abdominal circumference (cm) | 82.8 ± 2.6 | 89.1 ± 3.7 |
| Total back fat depth (mm) | 14.9 ± 1.4 | 17.6 ± 1.6 |
| Back fat inner layer (mm) | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 9.1 ± 1.0 |
| LD diameter (mm) | 20.9 ± 2.1 | 25.6 ± 2.5 |
Group C = grupo control. Group HT = treated with hydroxytyrosol.
Mean values (± S.E.M.) of the fatty acids composition of tissues in 180 days-old pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol (groups HT and C, respectively). All values are significantly different between treatments (p < 0.05).
| Tissue | Lipid Fraction /Layer | Variable | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HT | |||
|
| - | Moisture (%) | 73.0 ± 2.2 | 76.8 ± 2.3 |
| - | IMF (%) | 17.2 ± 1.4 | 13.4 ± 1.5 | |
|
| Outer | SFA (g/100g FA) | 36.3 ± 1.1 | 38.6 ± 1.2 |
| MUFA (g/100g FA) | 49.7 ± 1.0 | 47.7 ± 1.0 | ||
| MUFA/SFA | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | ||
Group C = grupo control. Group HT = treated with hydroxytyrosol. GM = gluteus medius muscle. FA = Fatty acids, IMF = Intramuscular fat; SFA = sum of saturated FA, MUFA = sum of monounsaturated FA.
Mean values (± S.E.M.) of the fatty acids composition of tissues in pigs of small and large litters born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol (groups HT and C, respectively) at 180 days-old. All values are significantly different between treatments (p < 0.05).
| Tissue | Lipid Fraction | Variable | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small (< 8) | Large (≥ 8) | |||||
| C | HT | C | HT | |||
|
| Neutral | PUFA (g/100g FA) | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 8.2 ± 0.8 | 6.5 ± 0.7 |
| Σn6 (g/100g FA) | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 0.7 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 0.7 | ||
| Polar | Σn3 (g/100g FA) | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | |
| Σn6/Σn3 | 11.8 ± 0.4 | 10.0 ± 0.6 | 10.9 ± 0.6 | 11.2 ± 0.5 | ||
|
| Neutral | PUFA (g/100g FA) | 8.4 ± 1.0 | 9.2 ± 1.3 | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 9.3 ± 0.9 |
| Σn6 (g/100g FA) | 7.4 ± 0.8 | 8.0 ± 1.2 | 9.7 ± 1.1 | 8.1 ± 0.9 | ||
| Polar | MUFA (g/100g FA) | 16.9 ± 1.0 | 14.6 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 0.7 | 14.6 ± 0.6 | |
| PUFA (g/100g FA) | 47.6 ± 0.7 | 49.5 ± 1.0 | 49.3 ± 0.8 | 49.3 ± 0.6 | ||
| Σn6 (g/100g FA) | 43.3 ± 0.6 | 45.0 ± 0.9 | 44.9 ± 0.4 | 44.8 ± 0.8 | ||
| MUFA/SFA | 0.5 ± 0.05 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | ||
|
| Neutral | Σn3 (g/100g FA) | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.5 |
| Σn6/Σn3 | 8.3 ± 10.7 | 6.3 ± 0.9 | 6.8 ± 0.7 | 7.8 ± 0.6 | ||
| Polar | Σn3 (g/100g FA) | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | |
| Σn6/Σn3 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | ||
Group C: grupo control. Group HT: treated with hydroxytyrosol. LD = longissimus dorsi muscle, GM = gluteus medius muscle. FA = Fatty acids, SFA = sum of saturated fatty acids; MUFA = sum of monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA = sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Mean values (± S.E.M.) of the fatty acids composition of tissues in pigs born from sows treated or not with hydroxytyrosol (groups HT and C, respectively) at 25 days-old. All values are significantly different between treatments (P < 0.05).
| Tissue | Lipid Fraction | Variable | Treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | HT | |||
|
| Neutral | C18:1/C18:0 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 7.8 ± 0.5 |
|
| Neutral | C18:1/C18:0 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 7.7 ± 0.4 |
| Polar | MUFA (g/100g FA) | 19.1 ± 0.6 | 20.3 ± 0.5 | |
| MUFA/SFA | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.01 | ||
|
| Polar | SFA (g/100g FA) | 47.8 ± 1.8 | 51.1 ± 1.2 |
| MUFA (g/100g FA) | 15.2 ± 1.9 | 11.1 ± 1.4 | ||
|
| Neutral | MUFA (g/100g FA) | 29.3 ± 0.9 | 27.5 ± 0.7 |
Group C = grupo control. Group HT= treated with hydroxytyrosol LD = longissimus dorsi muscle, GM = gluteus medius muscle. FA = Fatty acids; SFA = sum of saturated fatty acids, MUFA = sum of monounsaturated fatty acids.