Carla N Urata1, Eduardo B Mariottoni1, Alessandro A Jammal1, Nara G Ogata1, Atalie C Thompson1, Samuel I Berchuck2, Tais Estrela1, Felipe A Medeiros3. 1. Duke Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Duke Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Statistical Science and Forge, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Duke Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: felipe.medeiros@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess short- and long-term variability on standard automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: Ordinary least squares linear regression of SAP mean deviation (MD) and SD-OCT global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were fitted over time for sequential tests conducted within 5 weeks (short-term testing) and annually (long-term testing). Residuals were obtained by subtracting the predicted and observed values, and each patient's standard deviation (SD) of the residuals was used as a measure of variability. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test the hypothesis of equality between short- and long-term variability. RESULTS: A total of 43 eyes of 43 glaucoma subjects were included. Subjects had a mean 4.5 ± 0.8 SAP and OCT tests for short-term variability assessment. For long-term variability, the same number of tests were performed and results annually collected over an average of 4.0 ± 0.8 years. The average SD of the residuals was significantly higher in the long-term than in the short-term period for both tests: 1.05 ± 0.70 dB vs. 0.61 ± 0.34 dB, respectively (P < 0.001) for SAP MD and 1.95 ± 1.86 μm vs. 0.81 ± 0.56 μm, respectively (P < 0.001) for SD-OCT RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term variability was higher than short-term variability on SD-OCT and SAP. Because current event-based algorithms for detection of glaucoma progression on SAP and SD-OCT have relied on short-term variability data to establish their normative databases, these algorithms may be underestimating the variability in the long-term and thus may overestimate progression over time.
PURPOSE: To assess short- and long-term variability on standard automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: Ordinary least squares linear regression of SAP mean deviation (MD) and SD-OCT global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were fitted over time for sequential tests conducted within 5 weeks (short-term testing) and annually (long-term testing). Residuals were obtained by subtracting the predicted and observed values, and each patient's standard deviation (SD) of the residuals was used as a measure of variability. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test the hypothesis of equality between short- and long-term variability. RESULTS: A total of 43 eyes of 43 glaucoma subjects were included. Subjects had a mean 4.5 ± 0.8 SAP and OCT tests for short-term variability assessment. For long-term variability, the same number of tests were performed and results annually collected over an average of 4.0 ± 0.8 years. The average SD of the residuals was significantly higher in the long-term than in the short-term period for both tests: 1.05 ± 0.70 dB vs. 0.61 ± 0.34 dB, respectively (P < 0.001) for SAP MD and 1.95 ± 1.86 μm vs. 0.81 ± 0.56 μm, respectively (P < 0.001) for SD-OCT RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term variability was higher than short-term variability on SD-OCT and SAP. Because current event-based algorithms for detection of glaucoma progression on SAP and SD-OCT have relied on short-term variability data to establish their normative databases, these algorithms may be underestimating the variability in the long-term and thus may overestimate progression over time.
Authors: Eun Ji Lee; Tae-Woo Kim; Robert N Weinreb; Ki Ho Park; Seok Hwan Kim; Dong Myung Kim Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christopher Kai-Shun Leung; Marco Yu; Robert N Weinreb; Gilda Lai; Guihua Xu; Dennis Shun-Chiu Lam Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Bruce E Prum; Michele C Lim; Steven L Mansberger; Joshua D Stein; Sayoko E Moroi; Steven J Gedde; Leon W Herndon; Lisa F Rosenberg; Ruth D Williams Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Atalie C Thompson; Alessandro A Jammal; Samuel I Berchuck; Eduardo B Mariottoni; Zhichao Wu; Fabio B Daga; Nara G Ogata; Carla N Urata; Tais Estrela; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-06-14
Authors: Takashi Nishida; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; James A Proudfoot; Aimee C Chang; Ryan Caezar C David; Alireza Kamalipour; Nevin El-Nimri; Jasmin Rezapour; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 5.908
Authors: Shounak Datta; Eduardo B Mariottoni; David Dov; Alessandro A Jammal; Lawrence Carin; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.379