Literature DB >> 31715158

Comparison of Short- And Long-Term Variability in Standard Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.

Carla N Urata1, Eduardo B Mariottoni1, Alessandro A Jammal1, Nara G Ogata1, Atalie C Thompson1, Samuel I Berchuck2, Tais Estrela1, Felipe A Medeiros3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess short- and long-term variability on standard automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
METHODS: Ordinary least squares linear regression of SAP mean deviation (MD) and SD-OCT global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were fitted over time for sequential tests conducted within 5 weeks (short-term testing) and annually (long-term testing). Residuals were obtained by subtracting the predicted and observed values, and each patient's standard deviation (SD) of the residuals was used as a measure of variability. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test the hypothesis of equality between short- and long-term variability.
RESULTS: A total of 43 eyes of 43 glaucoma subjects were included. Subjects had a mean 4.5 ± 0.8 SAP and OCT tests for short-term variability assessment. For long-term variability, the same number of tests were performed and results annually collected over an average of 4.0 ± 0.8 years. The average SD of the residuals was significantly higher in the long-term than in the short-term period for both tests: 1.05 ± 0.70 dB vs. 0.61 ± 0.34 dB, respectively (P < 0.001) for SAP MD and 1.95 ± 1.86 μm vs. 0.81 ± 0.56 μm, respectively (P < 0.001) for SD-OCT RNFL thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term variability was higher than short-term variability on SD-OCT and SAP. Because current event-based algorithms for detection of glaucoma progression on SAP and SD-OCT have relied on short-term variability data to establish their normative databases, these algorithms may be underestimating the variability in the long-term and thus may overestimate progression over time.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31715158      PMCID: PMC7224685          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  31 in total

1.  Trend-based analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in eyes with localized nerve fiber layer defects.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Tae-Woo Kim; Robert N Weinreb; Ki Ho Park; Seok Hwan Kim; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  What reduction in standard automated perimetry variability would improve the detection of visual field progression?

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Residual standard deviation: Validation of a new measure of dual-task cost in below-knee prosthesis users.

Authors:  Charla L Howard; Chris Wallace; James Abbas; Dobrivoje S Stokic
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Series length used during trend analysis affects sensitivity to changes in progression rate in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: patterns of retinal nerve fiber layer progression.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-Shun Leung; Marco Yu; Robert N Weinreb; Gilda Lai; Guihua Xu; Dennis Shun-Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population.

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Pilar Casas-Llera; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete; Gema Rebolleda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Marie-Josée Fredette; William J Feuer; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.

Authors:  Francisco G Junoy Montolio; Christiaan Wesselink; Marijke Gordijn; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect Preferred Practice Pattern(®) Guidelines.

Authors:  Bruce E Prum; Michele C Lim; Steven L Mansberger; Joshua D Stein; Sayoko E Moroi; Steven J Gedde; Leon W Herndon; Lisa F Rosenberg; Ruth D Williams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  New insights into measurement variability in glaucomatous visual fields from computer modelling.

Authors:  Richard A Russell; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing the Rule of 5 to Trend-based Analysis for Detecting Glaucoma Progression on OCT.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Alessandro A Jammal; Samuel I Berchuck; Eduardo B Mariottoni; Zhichao Wu; Fabio B Daga; Nara G Ogata; Carla N Urata; Tais Estrela; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-06-14

2.  Long-term reproducibility of optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy and stable glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Takashi Nishida; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; James A Proudfoot; Aimee C Chang; Ryan Caezar C David; Alireza Kamalipour; Nevin El-Nimri; Jasmin Rezapour; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.908

3.  Mapping the binocular scotoma in macular degeneration.

Authors:  Cécile Vullings; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A Bibliometric and Mapping Analysis of Glaucoma Research between 1900 and 2019.

Authors:  Francisco López-Muñoz; Robert N Weinreb; Sasan Moghimi; F Javier Povedano-Montero
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Long- and Short-Term Variability of Perimetry in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  RetiNerveNet: using recursive deep learning to estimate pointwise 24-2 visual field data based on retinal structure.

Authors:  Shounak Datta; Eduardo B Mariottoni; David Dov; Alessandro A Jammal; Lawrence Carin; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.