William F Parker1,2,3, Allen S Anderson4, Robert D Gibbons1,3, Edward R Garrity1,2, Lainie F Ross2,5, Elbert S Huang1,2, Matthew M Churpek1,3. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
Importance: In the United States, the number of deceased donor hearts available for transplant is limited. As a proxy for medical urgency, the US heart allocation system ranks heart transplant candidates largely according to the supportive therapy prescribed by transplant centers. Objective: To determine if there is a significant association between transplant center and survival benefit in the US heart allocation system. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study of 29 199 adult candidates for heart transplant listed on the national transplant registry from January 2006 through December 2015 with follow-up complete through August 2018. Exposures: Transplant center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The survival benefit associated with heart transplant as defined by the difference between survival after heart transplant and waiting list survival without transplant at 5 years. Each transplant center's mean survival benefit was estimated using a mixed-effects proportional hazards model with transplant as a time-dependent covariate, adjusted for year of transplant, donor quality, ischemic time, and candidate status. Results: Of 29 199 candidates (mean age, 52 years; 26% women) on the transplant waiting list at 113 centers, 19 815 (68%) underwent heart transplant. Among heart transplant recipients, 5389 (27%) died or underwent another transplant operation during the study period. Of the 9384 candidates who did not undergo heart transplant, 5669 (60%) died (2644 while on the waiting list and 3025 after being delisted). Estimated 5-year survival was 77% (interquartile range [IQR], 74% to 80%) among transplant recipients and 33% (IQR, 17% to 51%) among those who did not undergo heart transplant, which is a survival benefit of 44% (IQR, 27% to 59%). Survival benefit ranged from 30% to 55% across centers and 31 centers (27%) had significantly higher survival benefit than the mean and 30 centers (27%) had significantly lower survival benefit than the mean. Compared with low survival benefit centers, high survival benefit centers performed heart transplant for patients with lower estimated expected waiting list survival without transplant (29% at high survival benefit centers vs 39% at low survival benefit centers; survival difference, -10% [95% CI, -12% to -8.1%]), although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers (77.6% vs 77.1%, respectively; survival difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -1.3% to 2.3%]). Overall, for every 10% decrease in estimated transplant candidate waiting list survival at a given center, there was an increase of 6.2% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.3%) in the 5-year survival benefit associated with heart transplant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this registry-based study of US heart transplant candidates, transplant center was associated with the survival benefit of transplant. Although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers, compared with centers with survival benefit significantly below the mean, centers with survival benefit significantly above the mean performed heart transplant for recipients who had significantly lower estimated expected 5-year waiting list survival without transplant.
Importance: In the United States, the number of deceased donor hearts available for transplant is limited. As a proxy for medical urgency, the US heart allocation system ranks heart transplant candidates largely according to the supportive therapy prescribed by transplant centers. Objective: To determine if there is a significant association between transplant center and survival benefit in the US heart allocation system. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study of 29 199 adult candidates for heart transplant listed on the national transplant registry from January 2006 through December 2015 with follow-up complete through August 2018. Exposures: Transplant center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The survival benefit associated with heart transplant as defined by the difference between survival after heart transplant and waiting list survival without transplant at 5 years. Each transplant center's mean survival benefit was estimated using a mixed-effects proportional hazards model with transplant as a time-dependent covariate, adjusted for year of transplant, donor quality, ischemic time, and candidate status. Results: Of 29 199 candidates (mean age, 52 years; 26% women) on the transplant waiting list at 113 centers, 19 815 (68%) underwent heart transplant. Among heart transplant recipients, 5389 (27%) died or underwent another transplant operation during the study period. Of the 9384 candidates who did not undergo heart transplant, 5669 (60%) died (2644 while on the waiting list and 3025 after being delisted). Estimated 5-year survival was 77% (interquartile range [IQR], 74% to 80%) among transplant recipients and 33% (IQR, 17% to 51%) among those who did not undergo heart transplant, which is a survival benefit of 44% (IQR, 27% to 59%). Survival benefit ranged from 30% to 55% across centers and 31 centers (27%) had significantly higher survival benefit than the mean and 30 centers (27%) had significantly lower survival benefit than the mean. Compared with low survival benefit centers, high survival benefit centers performed heart transplant for patients with lower estimated expected waiting list survival without transplant (29% at high survival benefit centers vs 39% at low survival benefit centers; survival difference, -10% [95% CI, -12% to -8.1%]), although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers (77.6% vs 77.1%, respectively; survival difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -1.3% to 2.3%]). Overall, for every 10% decrease in estimated transplant candidate waiting list survival at a given center, there was an increase of 6.2% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.3%) in the 5-year survival benefit associated with heart transplant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this registry-based study of US heart transplant candidates, transplant center was associated with the survival benefit of transplant. Although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers, compared with centers with survival benefit significantly below the mean, centers with survival benefit significantly above the mean performed heart transplant for recipients who had significantly lower estimated expected 5-year waiting list survival without transplant.
Authors: Mark A Schnitzler; James F Whiting; Daniel C Brennan; Krista L Lentine; Niraj M Desai; William Chapman; Kevin C Abbott; Zoltan Kalo Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Omar Wever-Pinzon; Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Jose N Nativi; Edward M Gilbert; Melanie Everitt; Rami Alharethi; Kim Brunisholz; Feras M Bader; Dean Y Li; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jacqueline M Smits; Erwin de Vries; Michel De Pauw; Andreas Zuckermann; Axel Rahmel; Bruno Meiser; Guenther Laufer; Hermann Reichenspurner; Martin Strueber Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Lauren K Truby; A Reshad Garan; Raymond C Givens; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Maryjane A Farr; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo; Veli K Topkara Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Eric S Weiss; Jeremiah G Allen; Arman Kilic; Stuart D Russell; William A Baumgartner; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William F Parker; Kevin Chung; Allen S Anderson; Mark Siegler; Elbert S Huang; Matthew M Churpek Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gege Ran; Kevin Chung; Allen S Anderson; Robert D Gibbons; Nikhil Narang; Matthew M Churpek; William F Parker Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael A Fuery; Fouad Chouairi; Peter Natov; Jasjit Bhinder; Maya Rose Chiravuri; Lynn Wilson; Katherine A Clark; Samuel W Reinhardt; Clancy Mullan; P Elliott Miller; Robert P Davis; Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Sounok Sen; Arnar Geirsson; Muhammad Anwer; Nihar Desai; Tariq Ahmad Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 5.501