Literature DB >> 31714985

Association of Transplant Center With Survival Benefit Among Adults Undergoing Heart Transplant in the United States.

William F Parker1,2,3, Allen S Anderson4, Robert D Gibbons1,3, Edward R Garrity1,2, Lainie F Ross2,5, Elbert S Huang1,2, Matthew M Churpek1,3.   

Abstract

Importance: In the United States, the number of deceased donor hearts available for transplant is limited. As a proxy for medical urgency, the US heart allocation system ranks heart transplant candidates largely according to the supportive therapy prescribed by transplant centers. Objective: To determine if there is a significant association between transplant center and survival benefit in the US heart allocation system. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study of 29 199 adult candidates for heart transplant listed on the national transplant registry from January 2006 through December 2015 with follow-up complete through August 2018. Exposures: Transplant center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The survival benefit associated with heart transplant as defined by the difference between survival after heart transplant and waiting list survival without transplant at 5 years. Each transplant center's mean survival benefit was estimated using a mixed-effects proportional hazards model with transplant as a time-dependent covariate, adjusted for year of transplant, donor quality, ischemic time, and candidate status.
Results: Of 29 199 candidates (mean age, 52 years; 26% women) on the transplant waiting list at 113 centers, 19 815 (68%) underwent heart transplant. Among heart transplant recipients, 5389 (27%) died or underwent another transplant operation during the study period. Of the 9384 candidates who did not undergo heart transplant, 5669 (60%) died (2644 while on the waiting list and 3025 after being delisted). Estimated 5-year survival was 77% (interquartile range [IQR], 74% to 80%) among transplant recipients and 33% (IQR, 17% to 51%) among those who did not undergo heart transplant, which is a survival benefit of 44% (IQR, 27% to 59%). Survival benefit ranged from 30% to 55% across centers and 31 centers (27%) had significantly higher survival benefit than the mean and 30 centers (27%) had significantly lower survival benefit than the mean. Compared with low survival benefit centers, high survival benefit centers performed heart transplant for patients with lower estimated expected waiting list survival without transplant (29% at high survival benefit centers vs 39% at low survival benefit centers; survival difference, -10% [95% CI, -12% to -8.1%]), although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers (77.6% vs 77.1%, respectively; survival difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -1.3% to 2.3%]). Overall, for every 10% decrease in estimated transplant candidate waiting list survival at a given center, there was an increase of 6.2% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.3%) in the 5-year survival benefit associated with heart transplant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this registry-based study of US heart transplant candidates, transplant center was associated with the survival benefit of transplant. Although the adjusted 5-year survival after transplant was not significantly different between high and low survival benefit centers, compared with centers with survival benefit significantly below the mean, centers with survival benefit significantly above the mean performed heart transplant for recipients who had significantly lower estimated expected 5-year waiting list survival without transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31714985      PMCID: PMC6865773          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.15686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  Survival benefit from transplantation in patients listed for heart transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Tajinder P Singh; Carly E Milliren; Christopher S Almond; Dionne Graham
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor.

Authors:  Mark A Schnitzler; James F Whiting; Daniel C Brennan; Krista L Lentine; Niraj M Desai; William Chapman; Kevin C Abbott; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified?

Authors:  Omar Wever-Pinzon; Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Jose N Nativi; Edward M Gilbert; Melanie Everitt; Rami Alharethi; Kim Brunisholz; Feras M Bader; Dean Y Li; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Is it time for a cardiac allocation score? First results from the Eurotransplant pilot study on a survival benefit-based heart allocation.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Smits; Erwin de Vries; Michel De Pauw; Andreas Zuckermann; Axel Rahmel; Bruno Meiser; Guenther Laufer; Hermann Reichenspurner; Martin Strueber
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes.

Authors:  Lauren K Truby; A Reshad Garan; Raymond C Givens; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Maryjane A Farr; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Development of a quantitative donor risk index to predict short-term mortality in orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  Eric S Weiss; Jeremiah G Allen; Arman Kilic; Stuart D Russell; William A Baumgartner; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm.

Authors:  P Christian Schulze; Shuichi Kitada; Kevin Clerkin; Zhezhen Jin; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  Trends in the Use of Inotropes to List Adult Heart Transplant Candidates at Status 1A.

Authors:  William F Parker; Edward R Garrity; Savitri Fedson; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  A Tutorial on Multilevel Survival Analysis: Methods, Models and Applications.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  6 in total

1.  Practice Changes at U.S. Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy.

Authors:  William F Parker; Kevin Chung; Allen S Anderson; Mark Siegler; Elbert S Huang; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Epistemic Authority and Trust in Shared Decision Making About Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  William F Parker; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Between-center variation in high-priority listing status under the new heart allocation policy.

Authors:  Gege Ran; Kevin Chung; Allen S Anderson; Robert D Gibbons; Nikhil Narang; Matthew M Churpek; William F Parker
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Center-level Utilization of Hepatitis C Virus-positive Donors for Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Laura M Seese; Robert Handzel; Yisi Wang; Gavin Hickey; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  An updated estimate of posttransplant survival after implementation of the new donor heart allocation policy.

Authors:  Kevin A Lazenby; Nikhil Narang; Kenley M Pelzer; Gege Ran; William F Parker
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 9.369

6.  Trends and Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in the Lowest Urgency Candidates.

Authors:  Michael A Fuery; Fouad Chouairi; Peter Natov; Jasjit Bhinder; Maya Rose Chiravuri; Lynn Wilson; Katherine A Clark; Samuel W Reinhardt; Clancy Mullan; P Elliott Miller; Robert P Davis; Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Sounok Sen; Arnar Geirsson; Muhammad Anwer; Nihar Desai; Tariq Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.