Literature DB >> 34951528

An updated estimate of posttransplant survival after implementation of the new donor heart allocation policy.

Kevin A Lazenby1, Nikhil Narang2,3, Kenley M Pelzer4, Gege Ran1, William F Parker4,5.   

Abstract

The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) implemented a new heart allocation policy on October 18, 2018. Published estimates of lower posttransplant survival under the new policy in cohorts with limited follow-up may be biased by informative censoring. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate 1-year posttransplant survival for pre-policy (November 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017) and post-policy cohorts (November 1, 2018, to October 31, 2019) with follow-up through March 2, 2021. We adjusted for changes in recipient population over time with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. To demonstrate the effect of inadequate follow-up on post-policy survival estimates, we repeated the analysis but only included follow-up through October 31, 2019. Transplant programs transplanted 2594 patients in the pre-policy cohort and 2761 patients in the post-policy cohort. With follow-up through March 2, 2021, unadjusted 1-year posttransplant survival was 90.6% (89.5%-91.8%) in the pre-policy cohort and 90.8% (89.7%-91.9%) in the post-policy cohort (adjusted HR = 0.93 [0.77-1.12]). Ignoring follow-up after October 31, 2019, the post-policy estimate was biased downward (1-year: 82.2%). When estimated with adequate follow-up, 1-year posttransplant survival under the new heart allocation policy was not significantly different.
© 2022 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); health services and outcomes research; heart transplantation/cardiology; patient survival; registry/registry analysis; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34951528      PMCID: PMC9177535          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   9.369


  18 in total

1.  Impact of informative censoring on the Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival in phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Federico Campigotto; Edie Weller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  When good intentions turn bad: A need for course correction.

Authors:  Hector O Ventura; Howard Eisen
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  "Unintended" Consequences of Changes in Heart Transplant Allocation Policy: Impact on Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Jaimin R Trivedi; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Variation of heart transplant rates in the United States during holidays.

Authors:  Justin L Grodin; Colby R Ayers; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Joseph D Mishkin; Pradeep P A Mammen; David W Markham; Mark H Drazner; Parag C Patel
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Validation of the United States-derived Index for Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Transplantation (IMPACT) using international registry data.

Authors:  Arman Kilic; Jeremiah G Allen; Eric S Weiss
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Reassessing Recipient Mortality Under the New Heart Allocation System: An Updated UNOS Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Oliver K Jawitz; Marat Fudim; Vignesh Raman; Benjamin S Bryner; Adam D DeVore; Robert J Mentz; Carmelo Milano; Chetan B Patel; Jacob N Schroder; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 12.035

7.  Outcomes in the 2018 UNOS donor heart allocation system: A perspective on disparate analyses.

Authors:  Anubodh S Varshney; Sameer A Hirji; Michael M Givertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Between-center variation in high-priority listing status under the new heart allocation policy.

Authors:  Gege Ran; Kevin Chung; Allen S Anderson; Robert D Gibbons; Nikhil Narang; Matthew M Churpek; William F Parker
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  United Network for Organ Sharing 2018 Heart Transplant Reallocation Policy: Aiming for Evidence-Based Policy.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Update to an early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.

Authors:  Thomas C Hanff; Michael O Harhay; Stephen E Kimmel; Edo Y Birati; Michael A Acker
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationships between 2018 UNOS heart policy and transplant outcomes in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural settings.

Authors:  Khadijah Breathett; Shannon M Knapp; Daniel Addison; Amber Johnson; Rashmee U Shah; Kelsey Flint; Harriette G C Van Spall; Nancy K Sweitzer; Sula Mazimba
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 13.569

2.  The heart transplant allocation change attenuates but does not eliminate blood group O waitlist outcome disadvantage.

Authors:  Jay N Patel; Dmitry Abramov; Marat Fudim; Ike S Okwuosa; David G Rabkin; Joshua S Chung
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.456

3.  The effect of recipient BMI on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes after the 2018 heart transplant allocation policy change.

Authors:  Jay N Patel; David G Rabkin; Brett W Sperry; Anju Bhardwaj; Joshua S Chung; Dmitry Abramov
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.778

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.