| Literature DB >> 31714944 |
Jun Qiang1, Omyia Ahmed Mohamed Khamis1, Huo Jin Jiang2, Zhe Ming Cao1, Jie He1, Yi Fan Tao1, Pao Xu1, Jin Wen Bao1.
Abstract
High-density aquaculture and nutritional imbalances may promote fatty liver in genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT, Oreochromis niloticus), thus reducing the gains achieved by breeding. In this study, apple peel powder (APP) was used as a feed additive for GIFT. A control group (fed on a diet without APP) and five groups fed on diets supplemented with APP (at 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, or 0.8% of the diet, by weight) were established to investigate the effects of APP on GIFT growth performance and physiological parameters, and on gene expression as determined by transcriptomic analysis. Dietary supplementation with APP at 0.2% promoted GIFT growth, reduced total cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels in the serum and liver, and decreased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities in the serum. Gene expression profiles in the liver were compared among the control, 0.2% APP, and 0.8% APP groups, and differentially expressed genes among these groups were identified. Annotation analyses using tools at the Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases showed that the differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in the regulation of immunity and fat metabolism. The results showed that excessive supplementation with APP in the diet significantly inhibited the expression of insulin-like growth factor 2 and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein, and stimulated the expression of fatty acid desaturase 2, heat shock protein 90 beta family member 1, and nuclear factor kappa B. This resulted in disordered lipid metabolism and increased pro-inflammatory reactions, which in turn caused liver damage. Therefore, APP has good potential as an environmentally friendly feed additive for GIFT at levels of 0.1%-0.2% in the diet, but excessive amounts can have adverse effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31714944 PMCID: PMC6850550 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Ingredients and composition of basal diet.
| Ingredients (%) | 0 (Control) | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish meal | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Wheat middling | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Corn starch | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 |
| Soybean oil | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Soybean meal | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Cottonseed meal | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| Rapeseed meal | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Mineral premix | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Choline chloride | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Vit C phosphate ester | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Ca (H2PO4)2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Cellulose | 1 | 0.95 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Crude protein | 28.7 | 28.2 | 28.5 | 28.7 | 28.5 | 28.8 |
| Crude lipid | 7.3 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.5 | 7.3 |
1Vitamin premix (mg/kg dry diet): VA, 10; VD, 0.05; VE, 400; VK, 40; VB1, 50; VB2, 200; VB3, 500; VB6, 50; VB7, 5; VB11, 15; VB12, 0.1; VC, 1000; Inositol, 2000; Choline, 5000.
2Mineral premix (mg/kg dry diet): FeSO4.7H2O, 372; CuSO4.5H2O, 25; ZnSO4.7H2O, 120; MnSO4.H2O, 5; MgSO4, 2475; NaCl, 1875; KH2PO4, 1000; Ca (H2PO4)2, 2500.
Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
| Name | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | |
|---|---|---|
| LPL | ||
| IGF-2 | ||
| FABP2 | ||
| TLR2 | ||
| HSP90b1 | ||
| FADS2 | ||
| NF-kB | ||
| 18S rRNA | ||
LPL: lipoprotein lipase; IGF-2: insulin-like growth factor 2; FABP2: liver-type fatty acid-binding protein; TLR2: toll-like receptor 2; HSP90b1: heat shock protein 90 beta family member 1; FADS2: fatty acid desaturase 2; NF-kB: nuclear factor kappa B
Growth performance and feed utilization of GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on diets supplemented with apple peel powder for 8 weeks.
| Parameters | Dietary apple peel powder level (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| WG | 41.12±2.45b | 48.38±2.39ab | 51.94±2.86a | 54.65±2.92a | 42.43±2.87b | 31.46±4.33c |
| SGR(%/d) | 4.70±0.25b | 4.97±0.12b | 5.34±0.24ab | 5.68±0.20a | 4.82±0.12b | 4.29±0.23c |
| FCR(%) | 1.14±0.03a | 1.05±0.06ab | 1.04±0.05ab | 0.92±0.08c | 1.03±0.04ab | 1.15±0.04a |
| HSI(%) | 1.80±0.08a | 1.86±0.19a | 1.74±0.10ab | 1.64±0.14b | 1.58±0.06b | 1.51±0.11b |
| VSI(%) | 14.36±0.27a | 14.27±0.38a | 13.49±0.19ab | 12.21±0.27b | 12.45±0.19b | 12.81±0.44b |
| Survival (%) | 98.89±1.11 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | 96.67±1.93 | 100.00±0.00 |
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and are mean ± standard deviation. Differences among six groups were detected by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters show significant differences among treatment groups.
WG: Weight gain; SGR: Specific growth rate; FCR: Feed conversion ratio; HSI: Hepatosomatic index; VSI: Viscerosomatic index
Fig 1Relationship between specific growth rate and amount of apple peel powder (APP) in feed, as analyzed by two slope broken-line model.
Serum biochemistry parameters of GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on diets supplemented with apple peel powder for 8 weeks.
| Parameters | Dietary apple peel powder level (%) ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| TC(mmol/L) | 4.76±0.52a | 4.09±0.42b | 3.65±0.31bc | 3.51±0.37bc | 3.12±0.31c | 3.97±0.41a |
| TG(mmol/L) | 5.54±0.64a | 3.87±0.47b | 2.69±0.34c | 2.12±0.31c | 1.47±0.38d | 2.38±0.49c |
| GLU(mmol/L) | 1.89±0.32c | 2.17±0.25ab | 2.14±0.19ab | 2.33±0.31a | 2.27±0.17ab | 2.11±0.30b |
| ALT(U/L) | 29.76±1.47ab | 25.13±2.82b | 26.13±2.16b | 26.34±1.92b | 27.11±2.28b | 33.24±2.89a |
| AST(U/L) | 78.41±6.79a | 65.41±8.11b | 72.19±7.33b | 68.26±5.18b | 67.22±7.31b | 84.06±8.23a |
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and are mean ± standard deviation. Differences among six groups were detected using Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters show significant differences among treatment groups.
TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol; GLU, Glucose; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase
Hepatic biochemical parameters of GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on diets supplemented with apple peel powder for 8 weeks.
| Parameters | Dietary apple peel powder level (%) ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| TC(mmol/L) | 7.31±0.49a | 5.19±0.40b | 4.85±0.41b | 3.41±0.37c | 3.82±0.41c | 3.67±0.38c |
| TG(mmol/L) | 21.34±0.64a | 16.78±0.72b | 15.79±1.04bc | 14.12±0.91c | 16.27±0.68bc | 17.78±1.49ab |
| FFA(ng/mL) | 376.66±16.11a | 269.40±38.24b | 262.45±40.55b | 250.26±34.33b | 285.47±22.88b | 361.19±27.54a |
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and are mean ± standard deviation. Differences among six groups were detected using Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters show significant differences among treatment groups.
TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol; FFA, free fatty acids
Fig 2Histological analysis of liver sections by hematoxylin-eosin staining in GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on diets supplemented with 0% (A), 0.2% (B), and 0.8% (C) apple peel powder. H, hepatocyte; V, vacuolization; EH, enlarged hepatocyte; SN, shrunken nucleus.
Fig 3Histological analysis of liver sections by oil red O staining in GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) fed on diets supplemented with 0% (A), 0.2% (B) and 0.8% (C) apple peel powder. Ld, lipid droplet.
Overview of reads for mRNA-seq of GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) and quality filtering.
| Sample | Raw Reads | Base | Valid Read | Base | Valid Ratio (reads) | Q20% | Q30% | GC content% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APP_A1 | 45867590 | 6.88G | 45374664 | 6.81G | 98.93 | 98.59 | 90.43 | 49 |
| APP_A2 | 57594264 | 8.64G | 57040408 | 8.56G | 99.04 | 99.03 | 90.79 | 48.50 |
| APP_A3 | 52452746 | 7.87G | 40430496 | 6.06G | 77.08 | 99.23 | 91.10 | 52 |
| C1 | 49272160 | 7.39G | 48844226 | 7.33G | 99.13 | 99.08 | 90.64 | 48.50 |
| C2 | 54099584 | 8.11G | 53512740 | 8.03G | 98.92 | 98.47 | 89.52 | 49 |
| C3 | 49681658 | 7.45G | 49111518 | 7.37G | 98.85 | 98.68 | 90.00 | 49 |
| APP_H1 | 54547964 | 8.18G | 47660140 | 7.15G | 87.37 | 98.26 | 86.80 | 49.50 |
| APP_H2 | 63096352 | 9.46G | 62293208 | 9.34G | 98.73 | 99.13 | 92.26 | 48 |
| APP_H3 | 52005944 | 7.80G | 51294450 | 7.69G | 98.63 | 98.98 | 91.33 | 50.50 |
APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder
Fig 4Analysis of differentially expressed genes in APP_A vs. C, APP_H vs. C, and APP_A vs. APP_H group comparisons by transcriptome sequencing.
APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder.
Fig 5Venn diagram showing differentially expressed genes among APP_A vs. C, APP_H vs. C, and APP_A vs. APP_H group comparisons.
APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder.
Fig 6KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (corrected P-value < 0.05) in APP_A vs. C and APP_H vs. C group comparisons.
APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder.
Fig 7Validation of seven differentially expressed genes in APP_A, APP_H, and C groups by qRT-PCR.
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Differences between two groups were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (significance at P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters show significant differences among different treatment groups. APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder.
Relative gene expression levels of seven differentially expressed genes in APP_A vs. C and APP_H vs. C comparisons as estimated from mRNA-Seq data.
| Gene abbreviation | Gene | RNA-seq | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2 (fold_change) | Regulation (APP_A | Log2 (fold_change) | Regulation (APP_H | ||
| LPL | lipoprotein lipase | -1.67 | down | 2 | up |
| IGF-2 | insulin-like growth factor 2 | 1.85 | up | -2.57 | down |
| FABP2 | liver-type fatty acid-binding protein | 1.66 | up | -2.66 | down |
| TLR2 | toll-like receptor 2 | 3.62 | up | 1.95 | up |
| HSP90b1 | heat shock protein 90 beta family member 1 | -1.47 | down | 2.45 | up |
| FADS2 | Fatty acid | 1.37 | up | 3.64 | up |
| NF-κB | nuclear factor κappa B | -1.99 | down | 2.94 | up |
APP_A: 0.2% apple peel powder; APP_H: 0.8% apple peel powder; C: control group, 0% apple peel powder
Fig 8Pathways related to inflammatory response and fat metabolism in GIFT (Oreochromis niloticus) potentially affected by apple peel powder in feed.