Dario Tartaglia1, Salomone Di Saverio2, Weronika Stupalkowska2, Sandro Giannessi3, Virna Robustelli3, Federico Coccolini4, Orestis Ioannidis5, Gabriela Elisa Nita6, Virginia María Durán Muñoz-Cruzado7, Felipe Pareja Ciuró7, Massimo Chiarugi8. 1. Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. dario.tartaglia@unipi.it. 2. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. 3. General Surgery Unit, S. Jacopo Hospital, Pistoia, Italy. 4. General and Emergency Surgery Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy. 5. Fourth Surgical Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 6. General and Emergency Surgery Department, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy. 7. General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain. 8. Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) is feasible in selected patients with pelvic abscess and generalized purulent peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. We aimed to compare LPL and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in complicated acute diverticulitis. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with a pelvic abscess not amenable to conservative management and patients with Hinchey III acute diverticulitis, from 2015 to 2018. Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 28 (42%) underwent LPL and 38 (58%) underwent LS. In LS, patients had a primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, or an end colostomy (HA). Major outcomes were mortality, morbidity, failure of source control, reoperation, length of stay, and diverticulitis recurrence. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. In LPL, ASA score > 2 and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were significantly higher (p = 0.05 and 0.004). In LS, 24 patients (63%) had a PA and 14 (37%) an HA. No death was recorded. Overall, morbidity was 33% in LPL and 18% in LS (p = 0.169). However, failure to achieve source control of the peritoneal infection and the need to return to the operating room were more frequent in LPL (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006). Mean postoperative length of stay was comparable (p = 0.08). Diverticular recurrence was significantly higher in LPL (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: LPL is related to a higher reoperation rate, more frequent postoperative ongoing sepsis, and higher recurrence rates. Therefore, laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis carries a high risk of failure in daily practice.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) is feasible in selected patients with pelvic abscess and generalized purulent peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. We aimed to compare LPL and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in complicated acute diverticulitis. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with a pelvic abscess not amenable to conservative management and patients with Hinchey III acute diverticulitis, from 2015 to 2018. Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 28 (42%) underwent LPL and 38 (58%) underwent LS. In LS, patients had a primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, or an end colostomy (HA). Major outcomes were mortality, morbidity, failure of source control, reoperation, length of stay, and diverticulitis recurrence. RESULTS:Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. In LPL, ASA score > 2 and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were significantly higher (p = 0.05 and 0.004). In LS, 24 patients (63%) had a PA and 14 (37%) an HA. No death was recorded. Overall, morbidity was 33% in LPL and 18% in LS (p = 0.169). However, failure to achieve source control of the peritoneal infection and the need to return to the operating room were more frequent in LPL (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006). Mean postoperative length of stay was comparable (p = 0.08). Diverticular recurrence was significantly higher in LPL (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION:LPL is related to a higher reoperation rate, more frequent postoperative ongoing sepsis, and higher recurrence rates. Therefore, laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis carries a high risk of failure in daily practice.
Authors: Daniel Feingold; Scott R Steele; Sang Lee; Andreas Kaiser; Robin Boushey; W Donald Buie; Janice Frederick Rafferty Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Sandra Vennix; Gijsbert D Musters; Irene M Mulder; Hilko A Swank; Esther C Consten; Eric H Belgers; Anna A van Geloven; Michael F Gerhards; Marc J Govaert; Wilhelmina M van Grevenstein; Anton G Hoofwijk; Philip M Kruyt; Simon W Nienhuijs; Marja A Boermeester; Jefrey Vermeulen; Susan van Dieren; Johan F Lange; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ewen A Griffiths; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Salomone Di Saverio; Jan Ulrych; Yoram Kluger; Ofir Ben-Ishay; Frederick A Moore; Rao R Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Andrew B Peitzman; Ari Leppaniemi; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Osvaldo Chiara; Jeffry Kashuk; Boris Sakakushev; Dieter G Weber; Rifat Latifi; Walter Biffl; Miklosh Bala; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Kenji Inaba; Carlos A Ordonez; Andreas Hecker; Goran Augustin; Zaza Demetrashvili; Renato Bessa Melo; Sanjay Marwah; Sanoop K Zachariah; Vishal G Shelat; Michael McFarlane; Miran Rems; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Mario Paulo Faro; Gerson Alves Pereira Júnior; Ionut Negoi; Yunfeng Cui; Norio Sato; Andras Vereczkei; Giovanni Bellanova; Arianna Birindelli; Isidoro Di Carlo; Kenneth Y Kok; Mahir Gachabayov; Georgios Gkiokas; Konstantinos Bouliaris; Elif Çolak; Arda Isik; Daniel Rios-Cruz; Rodolfo Soto; Ernest E Moore Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Eva Angenete; Anders Thornell; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Stefan Skullman; Thue Bisgaard; Per Jess; Zoltan Läckberg; Peter Matthiessen; Jane Heath; Jacob Rosenberg; Eva Haglind Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969