Jonathan Catry1, Antoine Brouquet2, Frédérique Peschaud3, Karina Vychnevskaia3, Solafah Abdalla1, Robert Malafosse3, Benoit Lambert1, Bruno Costaglioli1, Stéphane Benoist1, Christophe Penna1. 1. Department of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. 2. Department of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. antoine.brouquet@bct.aphp.fr. 3. Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery Hospital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris-Ouest, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This prospective study aimed to compare outcomes after laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) and sigmoid resection with primary colorectal anastomosis (RPA). METHODS: From June 2010 to June 2015, 40 patients presenting with Hinchey III peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis underwent LPL or RPA. Patients with Hinchey II or IV peritonitis and patients who underwent an upfront Hartmann procedure were excluded. Primary endpoint was overall 30-day or in-hospital postoperative morbidity after surgical treatment of peritonitis. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent RPA and 15 LPL. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different after RPA and LPL (40 vs 67 %, p = 0.19; 4 vs 6.7 %, p = 1, respectively). Intra-abdominal morbidity and reoperation rates were significantly higher after LPL compared to RPA (53 vs 12 %, p < 0.01; 40 vs 4 %, p = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that LPL (p = 0.028, HR = 18.936, CI 95 % = 1.369-261.886) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal septic morbidity. Among 6 patients who underwent reoperation after LPL, 4 had a Hartmann procedure. All surviving patients who had a procedure requiring stoma creation underwent stoma reversal after a median delay of 92 days after LPL and 72 days after RPA (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: LPL for perforated diverticulitis is associated with a high risk of inadequate intra-abdominal sepsis control requiring a Hartmann procedure in up to 25 % of patients. RPA appears to be safer and more effective. It may represent the best option in this context.
PURPOSE: This prospective study aimed to compare outcomes after laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) and sigmoid resection with primary colorectal anastomosis (RPA). METHODS: From June 2010 to June 2015, 40 patients presenting with Hinchey III peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis underwent LPL or RPA. Patients with Hinchey II or IV peritonitis and patients who underwent an upfront Hartmann procedure were excluded. Primary endpoint was overall 30-day or in-hospital postoperative morbidity after surgical treatment of peritonitis. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent RPA and 15 LPL. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different after RPA and LPL (40 vs 67 %, p = 0.19; 4 vs 6.7 %, p = 1, respectively). Intra-abdominal morbidity and reoperation rates were significantly higher after LPL compared to RPA (53 vs 12 %, p < 0.01; 40 vs 4 %, p = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that LPL (p = 0.028, HR = 18.936, CI 95 % = 1.369-261.886) was associated with an increased risk of postoperative intra-abdominal septic morbidity. Among 6 patients who underwent reoperation after LPL, 4 had a Hartmann procedure. All surviving patients who had a procedure requiring stoma creation underwent stoma reversal after a median delay of 92 days after LPL and 72 days after RPA (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION:LPL for perforated diverticulitis is associated with a high risk of inadequate intra-abdominal sepsis control requiring a Hartmann procedure in up to 25 % of patients. RPA appears to be safer and more effective. It may represent the best option in this context.
Authors: Sandra Vennix; Gijsbert D Musters; Irene M Mulder; Hilko A Swank; Esther C Consten; Eric H Belgers; Anna A van Geloven; Michael F Gerhards; Marc J Govaert; Wilhelmina M van Grevenstein; Anton G Hoofwijk; Philip M Kruyt; Simon W Nienhuijs; Marja A Boermeester; Jefrey Vermeulen; Susan van Dieren; Johan F Lange; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christian Eugen Oberkofler; Andreas Rickenbacher; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Kuno Lehmann; Peter Villiger; Christian Buchli; Felix Grieder; Hans Gelpke; Marco Decurtins; Adrien A Tempia-Caliera; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Stefan Breitenstein Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hilko A Swank; Jefrey Vermeulen; Johan F Lange; Irene M Mulder; Joost A B van der Hoeven; Laurents P S Stassen; Rogier M P H Crolla; Meindert N Sosef; Simon W Nienhuijs; Robbert J I Bosker; Maarten J Boom; Philip M Kruyt; Dingeman J Swank; Willem H Steup; Eelco J R de Graaf; Wibo F Weidema; Robert E G J M Pierik; Hubert A Prins; Hein B A C Stockmann; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Bart A van Wagensveld; Peter-Paul L O Coene; Gerrit D Slooter; Esther C J Consten; Eino B van Duijn; Michael F Gerhards; Anton G M Hoofwijk; Thomas M Karsten; Peter A Neijenhuis; Charlotte F J M Blanken-Peeters; Huib A Cense; Guido H H Mannaerts; Sjoerd C Bruin; Quirijn A J Eijsbouts; Marinus J Wiezer; Eric J Hazebroek; Anna A W van Geloven; John K Maring; André J L D'Hoore; Alex Kartheuser; Christophe Remue; Helma M U van Grevenstein; Joop L M Konsten; Donald L van der Peet; Marc J P M Govaert; Alexander F Engel; Johannes B Reitsma; Willem A Bemelman Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Andrew S Miller; Kathryn Boyce; Benjamin Box; Matthew D Clarke; Sarah E Duff; Niamh M Foley; Richard J Guy; Lisa H Massey; George Ramsay; Dominic A J Slade; James A Stephenson; Phil J Tozer; Danette Wright Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 3.917