Literature DB >> 31713252

Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies.

Ahtisham Younas1,2, Maria Pedersen3, Angela Durante4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify the characteristics of joint displays illustrating the data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies and to make recommendations for effective use of joint displays for the integration of qualitative and quantitative data in mixed-methods studies.
DESIGN: Discussion Paper. DATA SOURCES: We have completed this paper as a part of a mixed-methods prevalence review of 190 studies published in nursing journals. We searched 10 nursing journals and three databases from January 2014-April 2018, additional journal search was performed from May-September 2018. We reviewed 17 studies that used joint displays as the method of data integration. Using a joint display typology, checklists, summary tables, and personal experiences of using joint displays, we evaluated the quality of displays. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurse researchers should use advanced data integration approaches to increase the rigour of the mixed-methods studies. Joint displays can enable nurse researchers to efficiently integrate and synthesize the qualitative and quantitative data in mixed-methods studies. However, nurse researchers should clearly label the type and title of the display, include both qualitative and quantitative data and interpretations, and highlight the mixed-methods interpretations as confirmed, divergent, or expanded in the displays.
CONCLUSION: Joint displays are adopted for data integration in nursing mixed-methods studies. Improvements are required concerning data presentation in the displays. Researchers should provide clear titles and supporting data and inferences and identify the meta-inferences by assessing the fit between quantitative and qualitative data. IMPACT: Despite the importance of integration in mixed methods, reviews indicated a consistent lack of integration in nursing research. Joint displays are structured frameworks used for the integration and synthesis of the qualitative and quantitative data at the analysis and interpretation levels. The discussed typology and characteristics of displays can enable nurse researchers to enhance the quality and presentation of integrated results in mixed-methods studies.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  data integration; joint displays; mixed methods; nurses; nursing; nursing research; research methods

Year:  2019        PMID: 31713252     DOI: 10.1111/jan.14264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based advance care plan for dementia.

Authors:  Liza L Behrens; Brianna Morgan; Emily Summerhayes; Sonia Talwar; Vanessa L Burshnic-Neal; Mary Ersek; Nancy Hodgson
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.525

2.  Effects of an internationalization at home (IAH) programme on cultural awareness among medical and nursing students in Hong Kong and Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Patrick Pui Kin Kor; Clare Tsz Kiu Yu; Ida Ayu Triastuti; Mitra Andini Sigilipoe; Haryo Dimasto Kristiyanto; Johana Puspasari Dwi Pratiwi; Teguh Kristian Perdamaian; Lisa Mengli Li; Phyllis Chui Ping Pang; The Maria Meiwati Widagdo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Medical Students' Socialization Tactics When Entering a New Clinical Clerkship: A Mixed Methods Study of Proactivity.

Authors:  Anique Atherley; Wendy C-Y Hu; Diana Dolmans; Pim W Teunissen; Iman Hegazi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 7.840

4.  LIVES for families psychological first aid training programme to address COVID-19 psychological distress: a mixed methods acceptability and feasibility protocol.

Authors:  Melissa Kimber; Sheila Harms; Noam Soreni; Maggie Inrig; Anita Acai; Ellen Louise Lipman; Roberto Sassi; David L Streiner; Harriet L MacMillan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Global child health in higher education in Germany: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Dennis Küppers; Michael Galatsch; Ralf Weigel
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 2.996

6.  Experiences and Needs of Patients, Caregivers and Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Colette Balice-Bourgois; Loris Bonetti; Angela Tolotti; Sarah Jayne Liptrott; Michele Villa; Corina Elena Luca; Laura Maria Steiner; Annette Biegger; Silvia Goncalves; Laura Moser; Antonio Palermo; Davide Sari; Dario Valcarenghi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Predictive Sequential Research Design to Study Complex Social Phenomena.

Authors:  Romel Ramón González-Díaz; Gladys Inés Bustamante-Cabrera
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.524

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.