Literature DB >> 31712986

The effect of chemical compromise on the recovery of DNA from skeletonized human remains: A study of three World War II era incidents recovered from tropical locations.

Suni M Edson1,2.   

Abstract

The use of DNA extracted from skeletonized human remains is a common challenge for those working in human identification. Thermal age and chemical compromise should be considered prior to performing DNA testing on skeletonized remains. Both heat and chemical contamination may cause damage to the DNA present in the osseous materials and a subsequent increase in both the difficulty and expense of DNA testing. For this study, three World War II era mass fatality events involving the US military, the USS Oklahoma, the Battle of Tarawa, and the Cabanatuan Prison Camps, were examined for the overall success of DNA testing using five DNA modalities: Sanger sequencing of mitochondrial DNA, AmpFlSTR® MiniFiler™; PowerPlex® Fusion; a modified AmpFlSTR® Yfiler™; and a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) protocol. Decedents from the three chosen incidents were buried in tropical environments and have the same approximate post mortem interval of 75 years, however, the chemical conditions that decedents were exposed to at each of the incidents vary. Remains from the USS Oklahoma were soaked in fuel oil and salt water immediately post-mortem; Cabanatuan Prison Camp remains were treated with a 'hardening' compound; and those from the Battle of Tarawa were not treated. Skeletal elements from each incident were compared across the 5 tested DNA modalities for success. Chemical insult to skeletal materials appears to have the greatest impact on every modality of DNA testing examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical compromise; DNA testing; Human identification; Skeletonized human remains

Year:  2019        PMID: 31712986     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-019-00179-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  21 in total

1.  Detection of bone glue treatment as a major source of contamination in ancient DNA analyses.

Authors:  Graeme J Nicholson; Jürgen Tomiuk; Alfred Czarnetzki; Lutz Bachmann; Carsten M Pusch
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization.

Authors:  Odile M Loreille; Toni M Diegoli; Jodi A Irwin; Michael D Coble; Thomas J Parsons
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 3.  The future of ancient DNA: Technical advances and conceptual shifts.

Authors:  Michael Hofreiter; Johanna L A Paijmans; Helen Goodchild; Camilla F Speller; Axel Barlow; Gloria G Fortes; Jessica A Thomas; Arne Ludwig; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Getting Ahead: Extraction of DNA from Skeletonized Cranial Material and Teeth.

Authors:  Suni M Edson
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Comparison of two ancient DNA extraction protocols for skeletal remains from tropical environments.

Authors:  Maria A Nieves-Colón; Andrew T Ozga; William J Pestle; Andrea Cucina; Vera Tiesler; Travis W Stanton; Anne C Stone
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Performance evaluation of a mitogenome capture and Illumina sequencing protocol using non-probative, case-type skeletal samples: Implications for the use of a positive control in a next-generation sequencing procedure.

Authors:  Charla Marshall; Kimberly Sturk-Andreaggi; Jennifer Daniels-Higginbotham; Robert Sean Oliver; Suzanne Barritt-Ross; Timothy P McMahon
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Efficiency of DNA-histone crosslinking induced by saturated and unsaturated aldehydes in vitro.

Authors:  J R Kuykendall; M S Bogdanffy
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The thermal history of human fossils and the likelihood of successful DNA amplification.

Authors:  Colin I Smith; Andrew T Chamberlain; Michael S Riley; Chris Stringer; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.895

9.  Optimal Ancient DNA Yields from the Inner Ear Part of the Human Petrous Bone.

Authors:  Ron Pinhasi; Daniel Fernandes; Kendra Sirak; Mario Novak; Sarah Connell; Songül Alpaslan-Roodenberg; Fokke Gerritsen; Vyacheslav Moiseyev; Andrey Gromov; Pál Raczky; Alexandra Anders; Michael Pietrusewsky; Gary Rollefson; Marija Jovanovic; Hiep Trinhhoang; Guy Bar-Oz; Marc Oxenham; Hirofumi Matsumura; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum.

Authors:  Henrik B Hansen; Peter B Damgaard; Ashot Margaryan; Jesper Stenderup; Niels Lynnerup; Eske Willerslev; Morten E Allentoft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.