Literature DB >> 31712923

Time to Surgery and the Impact of Delay in the Non-Neoadjuvant Setting on Triple-Negative Breast Cancers and Other Phenotypes.

Alina M Mateo1, Anna M Mazor2, Elias Obeid3, John M Daly4, Elin R Sigurdson4, Elizabeth A Handorf5, Lyudmila DeMora5, Allison A Aggon4, Richard J Bleicher6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Characterization of breast cancer phenotypes has improved our ability to predict breast cancer behavior. Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers have higher and earlier rates of distant events. It has been suggested that this behavior necessitates treating TNs faster than others, including use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) if time to surgery is not rapid.
METHODS: A review of women diagnosed with non-inflammatory, invasive breast cancer was conducted using the National Cancer Database for patients not having NACT, diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Changes in overall survival due to delay were measured by phenotype.
RESULTS: Overall, 351,087 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 36,505 (10.4%) TNs, 77.9% hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and 11.7% human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (HER2+). Phenotype, among other factors, was predictive of treatment delays. Adjusted median days from diagnosis to surgery and chemotherapy were 29.9, 31.6 and 31.5 (p< 0.001), and 72.7, 78.0 and 74.4 (p< 0.001) for TNs, HR+ and HER2+ cancers, respectively. After diagnosis, OS declined for all patients per month of preoperative delay (hazard ratio 1.104; p< 0.001). In models separating or combining surgery and chemotherapy, this survival decline did not vary by breast cancer phenotype (p > 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Delays cause small but measurable effects overall, but the effect on survival does not differ among breast cancer phenotypes. Our data suggest that urgency between diagnosis and surgery or chemotherapy is similar for breast cancers of different subtypes. Although NACT is sometimes advocated solely to avoid treatment delays, this study does not suggest a greater surgical urgency for TNs compared with other breast cancer phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31712923      PMCID: PMC7145740          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08050-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Estela Pineda; Barbara Adamo; Patricia Galván; Aranzazu Fernández; Lydia Gaba; Marc Díez; Margarita Viladot; Ana Arance; Montserrat Muñoz
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Erik Liederbach; Mark Sisco; Chihsiung Wang; Catherine Pesce; Susan Sharpe; David J Winchester; Katharine Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1999-2006.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Lesley H Curtis; Bradley G Hammill; Edward F Patz; Amy P Abernethy; Alisa M Shea; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Outcomes of delays in time to treatment in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy Eastman; Yolanda Tammaro; Amy Moldrem; Valerie Andrews; James Huth; David Euhus; Marilyn Leitch; Roshni Rao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Patterns of multidisciplinary care in the management of non-metastatic invasive breast cancer in the United States Medicare patient.

Authors:  Thomas M Churilla; Brian L Egleston; Colin T Murphy; Elin R Sigurdson; Shelly B Hayes; Lori J Goldstein; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marij A Hillen; Niki M Medendorp; Joost G Daams; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-12

8.  Time to Treatment: Measuring Quality Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Amy C Polverini; Rebecca A Nelson; Emily Marcinkowski; Veronica C Jones; Lily Lai; Joanne E Mortimer; Lesley Taylor; Courtney Vito; John Yim; Laura Kruper
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Amy S Clark; Bruce J Giantonio; Richard N Ross; Yun Teng; Min Wang; Bijan A Niknam; Justin M Ludwig; Wei Wang; Orit Even-Shoshan; Kevin R Fox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinical impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Debora de Melo Gagliato; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Richard L Theriault; Sharon H Giordano; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Time to Completion of Breast Cancer Treatment and Survival.

Authors:  Debra Pratt; Talia Burneikis; Chao Tu; Stephen Grobmyer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Enhancing social support and knowledge perception decreases patient delay in breast cancer.

Authors:  Baisen Li; Li Xia; Jing Yang; Min Wen; Miao Yu; Exian Mou; Shiwei Liu; Hui Li; Hao Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

3.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Cancer Surgical Delays in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ronnie J Zipkin; Andrew Schaefer; Changzhen Wang; Andrew P Loehrer; Nirav S Kapadia; Gabriel A Brooks; Tracy Onega; Fahui Wang; Alistair J O'Malley; Erika L Moen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  A New Modality for Breast Cancer Diagnosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Report.

Authors:  Florence Vibert; Camille Martel; Raluca Andreea Ionescu; Carole Mathelin; Shanti Ame
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Time to Treatment Initiation for Breast Cancer During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kathryn Hawrot; Lawrence N Shulman; Ira J Bleiweiss; Elizabeth J Wilkie; Zachary A K Frosch; Rachel C Jankowitz; Amy I Laughlin
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 6.  The Relationship between Time to Surgery (TTS) and Survival in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yongcheng Su; Xiaogang Zheng; Zhong Ouyang
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Personalized Risk-Benefit Ratio Adaptation of Breast Cancer Care at the Epicenter of COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Giulia Viale; Luca Licata; Lorenzo Sica; Stefania Zambelli; Patrizia Zucchinelli; Alessia Rognone; Daniela Aldrighetti; Rosa Di Micco; Veronica Zuber; Marcella Pasetti; Nadia Di Muzio; Mariagrazia Rodighiero; Pietro Panizza; Isabella Sassi; Giovanna Petrella; Stefano Cascinu; Oreste Davide Gentilini; Giampaolo Bianchini
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-26

8.  Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy P Hanna; Will D King; Stephane Thibodeau; Matthew Jalink; Gregory A Paulin; Elizabeth Harvey-Jones; Dylan E O'Sullivan; Christopher M Booth; Richard Sullivan; Ajay Aggarwal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-11-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.