Literature DB >> 31711254

Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Germany from 2007 to 2016: What Has Changed and Where Are We Now?

Alexander Klug1, Yves Gramlich1, Reinhard Hoffmann1, Joachim Pfeil2, Philipp Drees3, Karl Philipp Kutzner2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) is rising in many industrialized nations. At the same time, the evidence regarding different types of prostheses and fixation techniques is constantly evolving. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze changes in THA by these advancements during the last decade.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany from 2007 to 2016 was conducted using codes from the German procedure classification system and associated International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes. THA procedures were evaluated according to diagnoses, sex, and age of patients, along with the distribution of different prosthesis types. Additionally, changes in these parameters over time were analyzed.
RESULTS: From 2007 to 2016 a total of 2 157 041 primary THA procedures were performed in Germany, with an increase of 14.4% over this period. Overall, cementless standard THA (STHA) was used most frequently (50.0%), followed by hybrid variants (18.8%), hemiarthroplasties (15.9%), cemented standard THA (cSTHA; 9.2%), cementless short-stem THA (ssTHA; 4.8%), and hip resurfacing (HR; 0.9%) techniques. During the study period, the number of cSTHA and HR decreased significantly, whereas the use of STHA and ssTHA rose substantially, with a significantly higher application of these procedures in the elderly population. While osteoarthritis of the hip joint was the main indication for THA, several procedure-specific differences were identified.
CONCLUSION: The present data clearly demonstrate an increase in the use of cementless fixation for THA in Germany during the last decade and document a rise in ssTHA in recent years with, in contrast, the use of HR decreasing to a minimum. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31711254     DOI: 10.1055/a-1028-7822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall        ISSN: 1864-6697            Impact factor:   0.923


  6 in total

1.  Antioxidant System and Ions Concentrations After Femoral Neck and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karol Ochocki; Tomasz Stołtny; Alina Ostałowska; Marta Wróbel; Dominika Rokicka; Jarosław Pasek; Sławomir Kasperczyk; Krzysztof Strojek; Bogdan Koczy
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 2.  What the Surgeon Can Do to Reduce the Risk of Trunnionosis in Hip Arthroplasty: Recommendations from the Literature.

Authors:  Claude B Rieker; Peter Wahl
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Evaluation of intra- and interobserver reliability in the assessment of the 'critical trochanter angle'.

Authors:  Sebastian Serong; Moritz Schutzbach; Ivica Zovko; Marcus Jäger; Stefan Landgraeber; Marcel Haversath
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Can hip resurfacing be safely revised with short-stem total hip arthroplasty? A case series of six patients.

Authors:  Marcel Coutandin; Yama Afghanyar; Philipp Drees; Jens Dargel; Philipp Rehbein; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Xiaobin Shang; Yan Fang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  In vivo analysis of hip joint loading on Nordic walking novices.

Authors:  Yannick Palmowski; Srdan Popovic; Simone G Schuster; Sebastian Hardt; Philipp Damm
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.