Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania.

The biodiversity and taxonomy of colonial volvocine green algae are important in ancient lakes in tropical regions. However, few taxonomic studies of these algae have been conducted in African ancient lakes. Here, we describe two species of colonial volvocine green algae in cultures originating from water samples from Lake Victoria, an ancient lake in Africa. One was identified as an undescribed morphological species of Eudorina; E. compacta sp. nov. This new species can be distinguished from other Eudorina species by its compactly arranged vegetative cells that form a hollow ellipsoidal colony. The other was identified as Colemanosphaera charkowiensis. The genus Colemanosphaera is new to Africa.

Introduction

The volvocine green algae are a model lineage for studying the evolution of sex and multicellularity [1,2]. Culture materials established from samples we recently collected in Thailand contained two colonial volvocine species that are distributed only in a restricted tropical area: Pleodorina sphaerica [3] and Volvox dissipatrix [4]. Based on samples collected from Lake Biwa, a Japanese ancient lake, in 2013, Volvox africanus was recorded for the first time in Japan and a new species of Volvox, V. reticuliferus, was described [5]. Ancient lakes in the world provide significantly high diversity and levels of endemicity in animals and diatoms [6-8]. Therefore, field collections in African ancient lakes should be fruitful for studying the biodiversity and taxonomy of colonial volvocine green algae.

In Africa, several species of the genus Volvox have been recorded based on field samples collected since the 20th century [9-11]. Cultures of colonial volvocine green algae have been established from soil samples collected in Africa, including Volvox capensis [12], V. rousseletii [13], and Gonium pectorale [14]. However, colonial volvocine green algae have not been recorded from African ancient lakes.

In December 2018, we visited Lake Victoria, an ancient lake in Africa [6,8]. Based on material cultured from water samples collected from Lake Victoria, two colonial volvocine genera were identified: Eudorina and Colemanosphaera. This report describes the morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of these two algae.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

We collected colonial volvocine green algae from the water column of Lake Victoria. S1 Table shows the collection locations and details. Research in Mwanza was permitted by the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) (Nos. 2018-525-NA-2018-213 and 2018-527-NA-2018-213 for HN and RM, respectively).

Establishment of cultures and morphological observations

Water samples were collected from Nyegezi, Mwanza within the Mwanza Gulf, in southern Lake Victoria, 3–5 December 2018 (S1 Table). Using the pipette-washing method [15], 23 clonal cultures of colonial volvocine green algae (Eudorina and Colemanosphaera) were established from the water samples. The cultures were maintained in screw-cap tubes (18 × 150 mm) containing 10–11 mL artificial freshwater-6 (AF-6) or Volvox thiamin acetate (VTAC) medium [16] at 25 °C with a 14:10 h light:dark schedule under cool-white fluorescent lamps at an intensity of 80–130 μmol m−2 s−1. Eight of these new wild strains were selected for detailed studies and are available from the Microbial Culture Collection at the National Institute for Environmental Studies [16; https://mcc.nies.go.jp/index_en.html] as NIES-4373– NIES-4380 (S1 Table).

Vegetative colonies and asexual reproduction of Colemanosphaera and Eudorina were observed by examining a small aliquot of colonies that were maintained by inoculating 0.5–1.0 mL of actively growing culture into fresh medium every 5–7 days.

To induce the production of sperm packets by Eudorina male strains (the gender was selected by genomic PCR as described below), an actively growing culture (10 mL VTAC medium at 25 °C as described above) was mixed with 20 mL of Pleodorina mating medium [17] in Petri dishes (20 × 90 mm). Zygotes were induced by mixing male and female strains (10 mL in total) with 20 mL of Pleodorina mating medium in Petri dishes.

Light microscopy was performed using a BX60 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Nomarski interference optics. For transmission electron microscopy of Eudorina, colonies in culture were subjected to double fixation (using 1.5% glutaraldehyde for prefixation and 2% OsO4 for postfixation) and examined as described previously [18] using a JEM-1010 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Molecular experiments

To determine the gender of the Eudorina strains, the presence or absence of the male-specific minus dominant gene (MID) was examined by genomic PCR with MID-specific primers (S2 Table). PCR was carried out as described previously [19].

Sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA [ITS-1, 5.8S rDNA, and ITS-2]) and chloroplast Rubisco large subunit genes (rbcL) of the strains were obtained as described previously [19]. To construct ITS rDNA and rbcL phylogenies, we analyzed the operational taxonomic units or species/samples/strains listed in S1 and S3 Tables. The sequences were aligned as described previously [20]. The alignments are available from TreeBASE (www.treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html; study ID: S25155). The root or outgroup was designated based on previous phylogenetic analyses of colonial volvocine algae [20]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses based on the ITS rDNA and rbcL alignments were performed using MEGA version X [21], with 1000 bootstrap replicates [22]. In addition, Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of the respective alignments were carried out using MrBayes 3.2.6 [23], as described previously [24]. The secondary structures of ITS-2 were predicted as described previously [20].

To calculate genetic distances, the ATP synthase subunit beta (atpB) and photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A2 (psaB) genes of a Eudorina strain (2018-1205-E14; S1 Table) and ITS rDNA of Eudorina illinoisensis strain NIES-460 were determined as described previously [19,25].

Nomenclature

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) in a work with an ISSN or ISBN constitutes a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants; hence, the new names contained in the electronic publication of a PLOS ONE article are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone, so there is no longer any need to provide printed copies.

Results and discussion

Molecular analyses

Based on the sequences of ITS rDNA and the chloroplast rbcL gene, the strains were classified into two types: Eudorina and Colemanosphaera. The 661 (Eudorina) or 669 (Colemanosphaera) base-pair sequences of ITS rDNA and 1128 base pairs of rbcL were completely identical among the strains of each type (S1 Table). Fig 1 shows the phylogenetic positions of the two Tanzanian species within the Volvocaceae, based on the rbcL sequences.

Fig 1

Phylogenetic positions of two species of colonial volvocine green algae originating from Lake Victoria (red) within the Volvocaceae (S1 Table) based on maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of rbcL gene sequences.

Bootstrap values from ML (left) and posterior probabilities from Bayesian (right) analyses are shown on the branches.

In the rbcL gene phylogeny (Fig 1), the Tanzanian strains of Eudorina compacta, E. minodii, and several strains of E. elegans formed a clade with 64% bootstrap support in the ML tree and 1.00 posterior probability for the BI tree. The Tanzanian alga E. compacta was robustly sister to E. elegans strain NIES-456 originating from Tokyo, Japan [26,27]. In addition, the Tanzanian Colemanosphaera strains were robustly included within the genus Colemanosphaera, and were closely related to C. charkowiensis from Lake Isanuma, Japan [20].

The ITS-2 phylogenetic analyses produced a more detailed phylogeny of the Tanzanian algae. A Korean strain (KMMCC 1257) identified as “Pandorina morum” was almost identical to the Tanzanian strains of Eudorina compacta in the ITS-2 sequence (S1 Fig). Based on comparisons of the secondary structure of ITS-2, no compensatory base changes (CBCs) were found between the Tanzanian Eudorina compacta and Korean alga (S2 Fig). Two CBCs were found in the secondary structure of ITS-2 between E. compacta and E. elegans strain NIES-456 (S2 Fig). The Tanzanian strains of Colemanosphaera and Japanese strains C. charkowiensis formed a small robust clade in which no CBC was detected in the secondary structure of ITS-2 (S3 and S4 Figs).

Morphological observations and taxonomy

Eudorina compacta sp. nov.

Morphological observations: Vegetative colonies were ellipsoidal or elongate-ovoid in shape, contained 16 or 32 cells of approximately identical size, and measured up to 95 μm long. The cells were compactly arranged at the periphery of the gelatinous matrix to form a hollow colonial structure (Fig 2A and 2B). The cells were hexagonal or pentagonal in the surface view due to mutual compression, generally had no fenestrations or spaces between them, and measured up to 23 μm in surface diameter (Fig 2C and 2D). Each cell was biflagellate and had a massive cup-shaped chloroplast with a stigma. Several or more contractile vacuoles were distributed throughout the surface of the protoplast of each cell (Fig 2C). There was a gradual decrease in stigma size from the anterior to posterior pole of the colony (Fig 2C). Three to seven pyrenoids of almost identical size were randomly distributed throughout the chloroplasts of mature vegetative cells (Fig 2D). All colonial cells performed asexual reproduction to form daughter colonies, as described previously in other species of Eudorina [28,29].

Fig 2

Light microscopy of Eudorina compacta Nozaki sp. nov. originating from Lake Victoria.

(A)-(D) Vegetative colonies of strain 2018-1205-E14. (A) Surface view of 32-celled colony showing compactly arranged cells. (B) Optical section of 32-celled colony showing a hollow structure. (C) Surface view of colonial cells showing a stigma (s) and contractile vacuoles (arrows) randomly distributed on the cell surface. (D) Optical section of colonial cells with multiple pyrenoids (p) within the chloroplast. (E) Formation of sperm packets (bundles of male spindle-shaped male gametes. Strains 2018-1205-E8 and E14. (F) Mature zygotes. Strains 2018-1205- E14 and TzCl-9.

In sexual reproduction, each cell in male colonies divided successively to form 32-celled sperm packets (bundles of spindle-shaped male gametes) (Fig 2E). Zygotes were spherical in shape, with a smooth wall, and measured 15–18 μm in diameter (Fig 2F).

Under a transmission electron microscope, the entire colony was surrounded by a tripartite boundary (colonial boundary) of extracellular matrix (Fig 3), as in other volvocaceans [18,20]. Each cell was enclosed tightly by a dense layer (cellular envelope) of matrix (Fig 3A–3C). The cellular envelopes of adjoining cells were tightly attached to one another in some sections (Fig 3B). The structure and arrangement of organelles within the protoplast (Fig 3C) were essentially the same as those in other volvocaceans [18].

Fig 3

Transmission electron microscopy of vegetative colonies of Eudorina compacta Nozaki sp. nov. strain 2018-1205- E14 originating from Lake Victoria.

Each cell is enclosed by a dense fibrillar layer (cellular envelope) of the extracellular matrix inside a tripartite layer or colonial boundary (asterisks) encompassing the whole colony. Abbreviations: ce, cellular envelope; ch, chloroplast; G, Golgi body; N, nucleus; p, pyrenoid. (A) Longitudinal section of colony showing hollow colonial structure. (B) Part of colony showing attachment of cellular envelopes of neighboring cells. (C) Longitudinal section of cell.

Remarks: Under a light microscope, the African alga Eudorina compacta is similar to Pandorina morum and P. colemaniae [30-32] in having cells arranged compactly to be angular in the surface view due to mutual compression. However, the ultrastructure of the extracellular matrix in E. compacta differs from that of P. morum and P. colemaniae [32,33]. In the Pandorina species, each cell of the colony lacks cellular envelopes inside the colonial boundary. By contrast, E. compacta has cellular envelopes tightly enclosing cells inside the colonial boundary (Fig 3) as in other volvocacean genera with spheroidal colonies without the differentiation of obligate somatic cells: Yamagishiella, Eudorina, and Colemanosphaera [18,20]. Of these three genera, E. compacta is morphologically consistent with Eudorina in having several or more contractile vacuoles throughout the surface of the vegetative cell (Fig 2C) and anisogamous sexual reproduction with the formation of sperm packets (Fig 2E) [20].

Morphologically, E. compacta is unique within the genus Eudorina in having cells compactly arranged to form a hollow spheroidal colony, generally without spaces between the adjoining cells in the surface view [27-31]. Our rbcL gene phylogeny clearly placed E. compacta in a robust clade composed of several strains of Eudorina elegans [28] and E. minodii [29] (Fig 1). Furthermore, this African species was sister to Eudorina elegans strain NIES-456 originating from Japan [32] and these two entities showed genetic differences in ITS-2 (the presence of two CBCs) and rbcL (7 of 1128 bp), atpB (10 of 1128 bp) and psaB (12 of 1494 bp) genes, which were sufficient to recognize different species of Eudorina (S1, S2 and S5–S7 Figs). Although E. compacta represents a derived lineage from E. elegans sensu Goldstein [28], the latter morphological species is apparently composed of multiple cryptic species, as suggested by its sexual isolation [28,34] and genetic diversity (Fig 1). Further detailed studies will construct a more natural taxonomic system for the species of Eudorina related to E. compacta.

Colemanosphaera charkowiensis

Morphological observations: Vegetative colonies were ovoid to ellipsoidal in shape, consisted of 16 or 32 cells of approximately identical sizes, and measured up to 78 μm long. The colonial cells were embedded at the periphery of the gelatinous matrix to form a hollow colonial structure (Fig 4A and 4B). The cells were ovoid to subspheroidal in shape, with a broad anterior face that was more or less angular, measuring up to 19 μm in surface diameter. Each cell was biflagellate and had a massive cup-shaped chloroplast with a stigma. Generally, two contractile vacuoles were located only near the base of the flagella of each cell (Fig 4C). There was a gradual decrease in stigma size from the anterior to posterior pole of the colony. The chloroplast contained strong longitudinal striations on the surface (Fig 4C and 4D). Three to six pyrenoids of almost identical size were distributed in the chloroplasts of mature vegetative cells (Fig 4D). All colonial cells performed asexual reproduction to form daughter colonies, as described previously [20].

Fig 4

Light microscopy of 32-celled vegetative colonies of Colemanosphaera charkowiensis strain 2018-1204-C1 originating from Lake Victoria.

(A), (B) Two views of colony. (C) Surface view of colonial cells showing anterior contractile vacuoles (arrows). (D) Optical section of colonial cells showing multiple pyrenoids (p) in the chloroplast.

Remarks: Within the colonial volvocine green algae, three genera (Yamagishiella, Colemanosphaera, and Eudorina) have 32-celled spheroidal colonies without somatic cell differentiation [20,31]. While Eudorina has multiple contractile vacuoles randomly distributed on the surface of each vegetative cell, Yamagishiella and Colemanosphaera have only anterior contractile vacuoles in each vegetative cell as in the African alga [20,35]. The latter two genera have different modes of sexual reproduction [20]. However, sexual reproduction was not observed in the present strains. The rbcL gene sequence data and strong longitudinal striations on the chloroplast surface and multiple pyrenoids of almost identical size in the chloroplast clearly assigned the present species to C. charkowiensis [20]. No such strong striations of the chloroplast surface are seen in the other species of Colemanosphaera, C. angeleri, which contains a large basal pyrenoid and small pyrenoids in the cup-shaped chloroplasts in mature vegetative cells [20]. Yamagishiella contains only a single basal pyrenoid in the chloroplast [35].

The genus Colemanosphaera was established based on C. charkowiensis, which was originally described as Pandorina charkowiensis originating from the Ukraine [20]. Nozaki et al. [20] studied Japanese strains of C. charkowiensis and C. angeleri and analyzed the ITS region of C. angeleri from Austria. Recently, C. angeleri and C. charkowiensis were recorded from China [36,37]. Ours is the first record of the genus Colemanosphaera in Africa.

Taxonomic treatment

Eudorina compacta Nozaki sp. nov.

Vegetative colonies ellipsoidal or elongate-ovoid in shape, containing 16 or 32 cells of approximately identical size, measuring up to 95 μm long. Cells compactly arranged to form a hollow colonial structure. The cells hexagonal or pentagonal in the surface view due to mutual compression, measuring up to 23 μm in the surface diameter. Each cell biflagellate, having a massive cup-shaped chloroplast with three to seven pyrenoids of almost identical size and several or more contractile vacuoles distributed throughout the surface. All colonial cells performing daughter colony formation in asexual reproduction. Sexual reproduction anisogamous with formation of sperm packets (bundles of male gametes). Under the transmission electron microscope, the whole vegetative colony surrounded by a tripartite boundary (colonial boundary) of the extracellular matrix, and each cell enclosed tightly by a dense layer (cellular envelope) of the matrix.

Holotype: Resin-embedded asexual spheroids of Eudorina compacta strain 2018-1205-E14 (TNS-AL-58961), deposited in TNS (Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan). This strain is available as NIES-4373 from the Microbial Culture Collection at the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan [16].

Strains examined: 2018-1205-E14 (= NIES-4373), 2018-1205-E11 (= NIES-4374), 2018-1205-E8 (= NIES-4375), TzCl-9 (= NIES-4376) and TzCl-3 (= NIES-4377) (S1 Table).

Etymology: The species epithet “compacta” meaning compactness of vegetative cells.

Type locality: Lake Victoria, Mwanza, Tanzania. A water sample was collected by RM and HN on 5 December 2018.

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Eudorina species related to Eudorina compacta from Lake Victoria based on ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS-1, 5.8S rDNA, and ITS-2) (S1 Table).

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

The secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) transcript of Eudorina compacta from Lake Victoria, including the 3’ end of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 5’ end of the LSU rRNA.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Colemanosphaera strains including those originating from Lake Victoria based on ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS-1, 5.8S rDNA, and ITS-2) (S1 Table).

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

The secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) transcript of Colemanosphaera charkowiensis from Lake Victoria, including the 3’ end of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 5’ end of the LSU rRNA.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of genetic distances between closely related strains in the genus Eudorina.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

The secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) transcript of Eudorina peripheralis strain UTEX 1215, including the 3’ end of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

The secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) transcript of Eudorina cylindrica strain UTEX 1197, including the 3’ end of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (RNA) and the 5’ end of the LSU rRNA.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

List of colonial volvocine species/strains included in the phylogenetic analyses of ITS-2 sequences (with DDBJ/EMBL/GENBANK accession numbers; S1 and S3 Figs).

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Primers used for genomic PCR of possible male-specific minus dominance (MID) gene of Eudorina compacta.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

List of the colonial volvocine taxa/strains included in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig 1) and DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers of rbcL genes.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.

2 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-26214

Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I am requesting some minor changes as described below.

In your revision please consider the suggestions of Reviewer 1 including the request for inclusion of more information on biodiversity and geographical ranges.  The significance of the collection site being an ancient lake (versus another type of lake or aquatic habitat) was not clear, so if you leave the “ancient lake” description in the manuscript please add some additional information to provide context on why this is an important distinction to make.

For Reviewer 2, Point 1, PLoS ONE does not discriminate based on perceived impact or target audience size, so no need to address this comment.  Point 2 raises a valid issue that continues to complicate taxonomic classification of volvocine algae due to extensive polyphyly, but I don’t feel it is something that must be solved here in order to publish this work.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 16 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript describes the isolation of two volvocine green algal species from Lake Victoria, a novel species, Eudorina compacta, and the first isolation of Colemanosphaera charkowiensis in Africa. The manuscript presents novel research, which is worthy of publication, and is clearly and concisely written. The methods are rigorous and the images are excellent. I have one suggestion meant to improve the manuscript- both the abstract and introduction overemphasize that Lake Victoria is an "ancient" lake. The introduction would be more convincing if the emphasis on ancient lakes was reduced and the value of characterizing species ranges and cataloguing global/African biodiversity was emphasized more. Similarly, the previously known species range of C. charkowiensis should be discussed in the Introduction.

Minor comment:

Page 5, second to last line of "Molecular analyses" section: "stains" should be "strains".

Reviewer #2: In the submitted manuscript, the authors described two colonial volvocalean green algae isolated from Lake Victoria (Tanzania). The ms is well written and all results are sound. The phylogenetic analyses are state-of-the-art. However, I have two major concerns.

1. The story is very small and is only of interests for small community. Therefore, I don't know if that should be published in a journal of wider audience such as PLOS One, but I leave this point to the editor.

2. Many studies about volvocalean algae have demonstrated that most genera are not monophyletic. So, the genus Eudorina is split at least into three lineages as the authors also showed. Therefore, in my view it is not possible to describe a new species of Eudorina if the status of this genus is not resolved. Even the type species of Eudorina, E. elegans, appears on different position in the phylogenetic analyses. It is clear that the new strain represents an own species, but if the authors want to describe a new species, the status of Eudorina elegans and the generic concept of Eudorina should be resolved. This can be done if the authors decide which strain of E. elegans will be designated as epitype. The epitype strain should be an isolate from Germany, near Berlin (type locality).

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

8 Oct 2019

Dear Dr. Jim Umen,

Thank you very much for your positive review results of our manuscript entitled "Morphology, phylogeny and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania " submitted for publication in PLOS ONE as a research article.

Based on the comments raised by Reviewers the academic editor, the manuscript has been revised adequately. Accession numbers of the new sequences, study ID of the rDNA ITS regions and rbcL-psbC sequences used for construction of the phylogenetic tress (Fig. 1 and S1 and S3 Figs) and NIES strain designations of the new Tanzanian strains of Eudorina compacta and Colemanosphaera charkowiensis have been obtained and described in the revised manuscript.

Our responses to the comments by the academic editor and Reviewers have been described below.

******

PONE-D-19-26214

Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I am requesting some minor changes as described below.

In your revision please consider the suggestions of Reviewer 1 including the request for inclusion of more information on biodiversity and geographical ranges. The significance of the collection site being an ancient lake (versus another type of lake or aquatic habitat) was not clear, so if you leave the “ancient lake” description in the manuscript please add some additional information to provide context on why this is an important distinction to make.

Response: In order to explain the significance of the collection site being an ancient lake, the following three references ([6-8]) suggesting the importance of ancient lakes worldwide in the biodiversity studies have been cited in the Introduction section of the revised manuscript.

6. Martens K. Speciation in ancient lakes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997; 12: 177–182. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01039-2.

7. Cristescu ME, Adamowicz SJ, Vaillant JJ, Haffner DG. Ancient lakes revisited: from the ecology to the genetics of speciation. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19: 4837–4851. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04832.x.

8. Kulikovskiy MS, Lange-Bertalot H, Kuznetsova IV. Lake Baikal: hotspot of endemic diatoms II. In: Lange-Bertalot H. editor. Iconographia Diatomologica Volume: 26. Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Scientific Books; 2015. pp. 1-656.

For Reviewer 2, Point 1, PLoS ONE does not discriminate based on perceived impact or target audience size, so no need to address this comment. Point 2 raises a valid issue that continues to complicate taxonomic classification of volvocine algae due to extensive polyphyly, but I don’t feel it is something that must be solved here in order to publish this work.

Response: I agree with these AE comments. See Responses described below.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 16 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript describes the isolation of two volvocine green algal species from Lake Victoria, a novel species, Eudorina compacta, and the first isolation of Colemanosphaera charkowiensis in Africa. The manuscript presents novel research, which is worthy of publication, and is clearly and concisely written. The methods are rigorous and the images are excellent. I have one suggestion meant to improve the manuscript- both the abstract and introduction overemphasize that Lake Victoria is an "ancient" lake. The introduction would be more convincing if the emphasis on ancient lakes was reduced and the value of characterizing species ranges and cataloguing global/African biodiversity was emphasized more. Similarly, the previously known species range of C. charkowiensis should be discussed in the Introduction.

Responses: In order to explain the significance of the collection site being an ancient lake, the following three references ([6-8]) suggesting the importance of ancient lakes worldwide in the biodiversity studies have been cited in the Introduction section of the revised manuscript.

6. Martens K. Speciation in ancient lakes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997; 12: 177–182. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01039-2.

7. Cristescu ME, Adamowicz SJ, Vaillant JJ, Haffner DG. Ancient lakes revisited: from the ecology to the genetics of speciation. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19: 4837–4851. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04832.x.

8. Kulikovskiy MS, Lange-Bertalot H, Kuznetsova IV. Lake Baikal: hotspot of endemic diatoms II. In: Lange-Bertalot H. editor. Iconographia Diatomologica Volume: 26. Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Scientific Books; 2015. pp. 1-656.

Species range of C. charkowiensis had been discussed in the Results and Discussion section; it is not needed to discuss in the Introduction section.

Minor comment:

Page 5, second to last line of "Molecular analyses" section: "stains" should be "strains".

Response: Done as suggested.

Reviewer #2: In the submitted manuscript, the authors described two colonial volvocalean green algae isolated from Lake Victoria (Tanzania). The ms is well written and all results are sound. The phylogenetic analyses are state-of-the-art. However, I have two major concerns.

1. The story is very small and is only of interests for small community. Therefore, I don't know if that should be published in a journal of wider audience such as PLOS One, but I leave this point to the editor.

Response: PLoS ONE does not discriminate based on perceived impact or target audience size, so no need to address this comment.

2. Many studies about volvocalean algae have demonstrated that most genera are not monophyletic. So, the genus Eudorina is split at least into three lineages as the authors also showed. Therefore, in my view it is not possible to describe a new species of Eudorina if the status of this genus is not resolved. Even the type species of Eudorina, E. elegans, appears on different position in the phylogenetic analyses. It is clear that the new strain represents an own species, but if the authors want to describe a new species, the status of Eudorina elegans and the generic concept of Eudorina should be resolved. This can be done if the authors decide which strain of E. elegans will be designated as epitype. The epitype strain should be an isolate from Germany, near Berlin (type locality).

Response: The main object of the present study is to delineate a new species of Eudorina. Although the polyphyly of the genus Eudorina has been a serious taxonomic problem, many further data of sequences and unobserved morphology are needed. Thus, the generic concept of the genus Eudorina has not been revised in this manuscript.

________________________________________

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

________________________________________

In compliance with data protection regulations, you may request that we remove your personal registration details at any time. (Remove my information/details). Please contact the publication office if you have any questions.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

10 Oct 2019

Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania

PONE-D-19-26214R1

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

14 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-26214R1

Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of two species of colonial volvocine green algae from Lake Victoria, Tanzania

Dear Dr. Nozaki:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. James G. Umen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE