Morphological and molecular identification of the dioecious "African species Volvox rousseletii (Chlorophyceae) in the water column of a Japanese lake based on field-collected and cultured materials.

Volvox rousseletii is a dioecious species belonging to Volvox sect. Volvox that has previously only been found in Africa. During field surveys in a large dam lake (Lake Sagami) in Kanagawa Prefecture, central Japan, we encountered a Volvox sect. Volvox species that produces dioecious sexual spheroids in the water column. Although sexual induction of this species in culture did not produce adequately well-developed sexual spheroids for species identification, molecular data directly obtained from field-collected sexual spheroids verified the identity of field-collected male and female sexual spheroids as well as cultured materials. Based on molecular and morphological data, the species was identified as V. rousseletii. This is the first record of a dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox in Japan.

Introduction

Volvox sect. Volvox is a morphologically interesting group of green algae due to the presence of thick cytoplasmic bridges between constitutive cells and spines on the zygote walls [1,2]. This section of Volvox includes seven monoecious and three dioecious species [3-5]. Although three of the monoecious species, V. globator, V. barberi, and V. capensis, are found on at least two different continents [1,3,4], records of the dioecious species of this section are not as frequent, and each has previously only been found in a small area of a single continent [1,5,6]. The three dioecious species are distinguished from one another primarily by differences in the morphology of the sexual spheroids [1,5]. In Japan, at least two monoecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox have been found [3,7]. However, dioecious species of this section have not previously been recorded from Japan.

During our field surveys of large dam lakes in Kanagawa Prefecture, central Japan, we encountered dioecious sexual spheroids of Volvox sect. Volvox in the water column of a lake. Although a subsequent culture experiment did not produce adequately well-developed and fully mature sexual spheroids for species identification, molecular data obtained directly from the fully developed sexual spheroids collected from the lake water resolved the species identity. The species was identified as V. rousseletii, which has previously only been reported from Africa [1,6]. The morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of V. rousseletii are described in this report.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

We collected Volvox rousseletii from the water column of a large dam lake, Lake Sagami. Collection locations and details are shown in Table 1. The collection of volvocalean algae in Lake Sagami and from water storage tanks of the Tanigahara Water Purification Plant was permitted by the Tanigahara Water Purification Plant of Kanagawa Prefecture Companies Authority, the Kanagawa Prefectural Government, Japan.

Table 1

List of species and field-collected samples/strains used in the present phylogenetic analyses (Figs 4 and 5).

Species	Sample/strain designation	Origin of sample/strain	GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ Accession number
			ITS-1, 5.8S rDNA and ITS-2	rbcL	psbC
Volvox rousseletii from Japan	2015-0610-3v6 a,b (= NIES-4336)	Water sample collected from LakeSagami, Kanagawa, Japan (water temperature 21°C; pH 9.1; N 35° 36.625’, E 139° 11.150’) in 10 June 2015.	LC493797 c	LC493808 c	LC493810 c
	2015-0610-3v7 a,b (= NIES-4337)		LC493798 c
	2015-0610-3v9 a,b (= NIES-4338)		LC493799 c
	v-sgm-17 a,b (= NIES-4339)	Water sample collected from LakeSagami, Kanagawa, Japan (water temperature 28°C; pH 9.6; N 35°36.732’, E 139°11.457’) in 26 July 2018.	LC493800 c	LC493809 c	LC493811 c
	v-sgm-23 a,d (= NIES-4340)		LC493801 c
	v-sgm-24 a,b (= NIES-4341)		LC493802 c
	Male-Sagami e		LC493803 c
	FeEg-Sagami f		LC493804 c
	v-tani-9 a,b (= NIES-4342)	Water sample collected from Tanigahara Water Purification Plant, Kanagawa, Japan (water temperature 22°C; pH 10.1; N 35° 35.459’, E 139° 17.782’) in 20 September 2018.	LC493805 c
	Male-Tani e		LC493806 c
	FeZy-Tani g		LC493807 c
Volvox sp. Sagami	NIES-4021	Japan	LC191308	LC191316	LC191326
Volvox capensis	M1-2 (= NIES-3874)	USA	LC0338704	LC033870	LC033872
Volvox kirkiorum	NIES-2740	Japan	AB663324	AB663322	AB663323
Volvox ferrisii	NIES-2736	Japan	AB663336	AB663334	AB663335
Volvox globator	SAG 199.80 (= UTEX 955)	USA	AB663340	D86836	AB044478
Volvox barberi	UTEX 804	USA	AB663341	D86835	AB044477
Volvox rousseletii from South Africa	UTEX 1862 (= NIES-734)	South Africa	AB663342	D63448	AB044479
Volvox perglobator	Tucson	USA	MG429137
	VspTf			KY489662	KY489659
Colemano- sphaera angeleri	NIES-3382	Japan		AB905592	AB905598
Colemano- sphaera charkowiensis	NIES-3383	Japan		AB905591	AB905598
Platydorina caudata	NIES-728 (= UTEX 1658)	USA		D86828	AB044494

a Established in this study.

b Male strain.

c Sequenced in this study.

d Female strain.

e Sexual male spheroids isolated from field-collected water sample.

f Sexual female spheroids with eggs isolated from field-collected water sample.

g Sexual female spheroids with matured zygotes isolated from field-collected water sample.

Establishment of cultures and light microscopic observations

Water samples were collected from Lake Sagami and storage tanks of lake water from Lake Sagami within the Tanigahara Water Purification Plant (Table 1). Clonal cultures of Volvox rousseletii were established from the water samples in Petri dishes (90 × 20 mm), using the pipette-washing method [8]. The cultures were grown in screw-cap tubes (18 × 150 mm) containing 10–11 mL artificial freshwater-6 (AF-6) [9] or AF-6/3 medium (AF-6 medium diluted with two volumes of distilled water [4]) at 20°C, 23°C, or 25°C on a 14 h light:10 h dark schedule under cool-white fluorescent lamps at an intensity of 80–130 μmol∙m–2∙s–1. Because the asexual spheroids of the dioecious species were indistinguishable from those of the monoecious species Volvox sp. Sagami in the same lake [7], clonal culture strains of the candidate dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox (V. rousseletii) were selected from the aforementioned established strains based on molecular information (see below). The new wild strains of the dioecious species Volvox rousseletii from Japan (Table 1) are available from the Microbial Culture Collection at the Institute for National Environmental Studies (NIES Collection, Tsukuba, Japan) [10] (http://mcc.nies.go.jp/index_en.html) as NIES-4336–NIES-4342 (Table 1).

To observe the morphology of asexual spheroids, the cultures were grown in Volvox thiamin acetate (VTAC) medium containing 200 mg L–1 sodium acetate 4H2O [10,11] or VTAC/3 (VTAC medium diluted with two volumes of distilled water [2]) at 25°C on 14:10 LD. A small aliquot of asexual spheroids in actively grown 2- to 5-day-old cultures in tubes or Petri dishes (55 × 15 mm) was examined. Sexual spheroids did not develop spontaneously in culture with either VTAC or VTAC/3 medium. To induce production of sexual spheroids in culture, urea soil Volvox thiamin/3 (USVT/3) medium [7] (USVT medium [VTAC medium supplemented with 40 mg L–1 urea and 40 mL L–1 soil extract medium] [4] diluted with two volumes of distilled water) was also used, and these cultures were grown at 25°C on 14:10 LD. To enhance sexual induction, 0.1–0.2 mL inducer (supernatant of the male culture after production of male sexual spheroids and sperm packets) was added to the USVT/3 medium and grown at 32°C on 14:10 LD. For maturation of sexual spheroids, 0.5–1.0 mL actively growing culture with sexual spheroids was inoculated into 10–11 mL USVT/3 medium.

Light microscopy was performed using a BX60 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Nomarski optics. The number of cells in spheroids was counted as described previously [1,11]. Individual cellular sheaths of the gelatinous matrix of the spheroids were examined after mixing approximately 10 μL cultured material with 2–5 μL 0.002% (w/v in distilled water) methylene blue (1B-429 WALDECK GmbH & Co Division Chroma, Münster, Germany).

Molecular experiments

To identify species and infer the phylogenetic position of the Japanese dioecious species, we used the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA; ITS-1, 5.8S rDNA, and ITS-2). The ITS rDNA sequences of cultured materials and field-collected sexual spheroids as well as two chloroplast genes (the large subunit of Rubisco [rbcL] and the photosystem II CP43 apoprotein [psbC] genes) of cultured materials were determined by direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products as described previously [7] except for DNA template and enzyme reaction for PCR. For field-collected sexual spheroids, five morphologically identical male or female spheroids were washed with culture medium and pipetted into a tube into which 30 μL 2×PCR Buffer of KOD FX Neo (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and one ceramic bead (5 mm in diameter; YTZ ball, Nikkato Co., Osaka, Japan) were added. For clonal cultures, approximately 30 μL concentrated cultured material were mixed with 30 μL 2×PCR Buffer and a bead. Then the tubes were subjected to a Retsch Mixer Mill MM300 (F. Kurt Retsch GmbH & Co.KG, Haan, RP, Germany) with 30 Hz for 10 min to produce “disrupted cell solution” for template DNA for PCR. PCR reaction mixtures were prepared with the disrupted cell solution (10–15% v/v in the mixture) and KOD FX Neo (for ITS rDNA and rbcL) or KOD One PCR Master Mix (Toyobo) (for psbC), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The PCR schedule for rbcL and psbC was 2 min at 94°C, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 50°C and 30 s at 68°C. For PCR of ITS rDNA, the schedule was 2 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 66°C and 30 s at 68°C.

For the phylogeny of ITS rDNA and rbcL-psbC [7], we analyzed the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or species/samples/strains listed in Table 1. The sequences were aligned as described previously [3,4,7]. The alignments are available from TreeBASE (www.treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html; study ID: 24792). Designation of the root or outgroup was performed as in a previous study [7]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses based on the ITS rDNA and rbcL-psbC alignments were performed using MEGA6.06 [12], with 1000 replicates of bootstrap analyses [13], In addition, Bayesian phylogenetic analyses for the respective alignments were carried out using MrBayes 3.2.6 [14], as described in a previous study [3]. The secondary structures of ITS-2 were predicted as described previously [2-4,7].

Results

Morphology of asexual spheroids of Volvox rousseletii from Japan

Mature asexual spheroids in culture were ovoid in shape with a broad posterior pole, measured 331–423 μm wide and 352–476 μm long, and contained 4700–11,800 cells embedded in individual sheaths at the periphery of the gelatinous matrix (Fig 1A and 1B). Somatic cells were connected to one another by cytoplasmic bridges thicker than flagella (Fig 1C), measuring up to 12 μm long. Somatic cells in the anterior region of the spheroid were pear-shaped to ovoid in side view, with the cell length longer than cell width (Fig 1D). Each somatic cell had two flagella, a single stigma, and a cup-shaped chloroplast with a single basal pyrenoid. Asexual spheroids typically had 4–8 gonidia. Gonidia were spherical in shape and distributed in the posterior two-thirds of the spheroid (Fig 1A). During daughter spheroid formation, gonidia of the next generation were evident in the embryo just after inversion (Fig 1E).

Fig 1

Light microscopic features of asexual spheroids in culture of Volvox rousseletii strain v-sgm-17 from Lake Sagami, Japan (Table 1).

(A) Mature spheroid showing daughter spheroids (d). (B-D) Part of spheroids. (B) Top view of individual sheaths (asterisks) of somatic cells stained with methylene blue. (C) Top view of somatic cells with thick cytoplasmic bridges (b). (D) Side view of elongate-ellipsoidal, anterior somatic cell with stigma (s) and pyrenoid (p) in the chloroplast. (E) Developing embryo just after inversion, showing gonidia (g) of the next generation.

Morphology of sexual spheroids of field-collected Volvox rousseletii from Japan

Mature male spheroids in field-collected samples were ovoid or ellipsoidal in shape, measured 304–468 μm wide and 337–534 μm long, and contained 9100–17,000 somatic cells and 35–92 sperm packets (Fig 2A). Sperm packets were compressed globoids composed of biflagellate male gametes, 34–44 μm in diameter, and positioned in the posterior 2/3–3/4 of the colony (Fig 2B). The packets did not develop simultaneously; early stages of sperm packet development were present in old male spheroids (Fig 2A). Female spheroids with mature eggs or zygotes were also found (Fig 2C–2F). These were ovoid or ellipsoidal in shape, measured 363–550 μm wide and 380–657 μm long, and contained 8900–14,000 somatic cells and 52–97 eggs or zygotes distributed in the posterior 2/3 of the spheroids (Fig 2C and 2E). The eggs did not develop simultaneously, but fully matured female colonies contained only matured eggs or zygotes (Fig 2C and 2E). The mature zygote was spiny, and the spines were slightly curved or straight with acute apices (Fig 2F). Zygotes were 31–39 μm in diameter (excluding spines). Spines were 3.4–6.4 μm long.

Fig 2

Light microscopic features of sexual spheroids of Volvox rousseletii from field-collected samples in Lake Sagami, Japan (24 July 2018; Table 1).

(A) Male spheroid with sperm packets (sp) of various developing stages. (B) Sperm packets (sp) developing within male spheroid. (C) Female spheroid with eggs (e). (D) Side view of egg (e) in female spheroid. (E) Female spheroid with matured zygotes (mz). (F) Matured zygote (mz) with acute spines on zygote wall.

Induction of sexual spheroids of Volvox rousseletii from Japan in culture

Although the ITS sequences were identical between field-collected sexual spheroids and cultured materials, sexual spheroids induced in culture were not well developed, particularly in female strains; matured zygotes were not obtained even after mixing male and female spheroids induced in culture.

Induced male spheroids were essentially the same as those found in the water column except that they were smaller (Fig 3A and 3B). Fully matured sperm packets escaped from the parental male colony within the culture.

Fig 3

Light microscopic features of sexual spheroids developing in culture of .

(A) Male spheroid with sperm packets (sp). (B) Side view of sperm packet (sp) in male spheroid. (C) Female colony with eggs (e). (D) Egg (e) in female spheroid.

Female spheroids in culture were also smaller than those found in the lake. They contained only eggs (Fig 3C and 3D). The eggs in female strains sometimes had a smooth or spiny wall and became reddish brown in color to develop into parthenospores.

Molecular identification and phylogeny

All specimens (excluding strains with nuclear rDNA ITS sequences corresponding to that of the monoecious species growing in the same lake, Volvox sp. Sagami [7]) exhibited identical sequences in the nuclear rDNA ITS region. Figs 4 and 5 show the phylogenetic position of the dioecious species Volvox rousseletii from Japan, based on the ITS region and rbcL-psbC genes, respectively. The relationships were essentially the same as those of previous studies [5,7], except for the additional OTUs (V. rousseletii from Japan and V. perglobator). The Japanese dioecious species V. rousseletii was sister to V. rousseletii strain UTEX 1862 originating from South Africa [6] with 80–87% bootstrap values and 0.89–0.97 posterior probabilities. Based on comparisons of the secondary structure of ITS-2, no compensatory base changes were found between the Japanese and South African algae (S1 and S2 Figs).

Fig 4

Phylogenetic position of Volvox rousseletii originating from Japan (Table 1) within Volvox sect.

Branch lengths are proportional to the evolutionary distances that are indicated by the sale bar. Numbers in left and right sides at branches represent bootstrap values (50% or more) based on 1000 replications of ML and posterior probabilities (0.85 or more) by Bayesian inference, respectively.

Fig 5

Phylogenetic position of Volvox rousseletii originating from Japan (Table 1) within Volvox sect.

Branch lengths are proportional to the evolutionary distances that are indicated by the sale bar. Numbers in left and right sides at branches represent bootstrap values (50% or more) based on 1000 replications of ML and posterior probabilities (0.85 or more) by Bayesian inference, respectively.

Discussion

Three dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox, i.e., V. rousseletii, V. perglobator, and V. prolificus, can be clearly distinguished from one another based on differences in the morphology of sexual spheroids observed in field-collected materials [1,15,16]. However, the cultured materials in the present study did not produce adequately well-developed sexual spheroids for species identification (Fig 3). Thus, taxonomic data were obtained from the field-collected samples including male and female spheroids and mature zygotes (Fig 2); these samples were identified as the same species as the cultured materials using ITS sequences. Two species of Volvox sect. Volvox (monoecious Volvox sp. Sagami and dioecious V. rousseletii) generally grow simultaneously in Lake Sagami, and the asexual spheroids of the two species cannot be morphologically distinguished. Thus, morphological data for asexual spheroids of V. rousseletii described here were based on cultured materials (Fig 1) after molecular identification.

The present morphological data from the Japanese dioecious species of Volvox rousseletii are consistent with those from sexual spheroids and zygotes of V. rousseletii from Africa, in that they exhibit continuous development of sperm packets during the maturation of male spheroids, the nearly simultaneous maturation of eggs in female spheroids, and acute spines in the zygote wall (S1 Table). Although V. rousseletii var. lucknowensis was described based on Indian material [1, 16], spines of the zygote wall of this alga are broadly conical, representing a different species. In another dioecious species of this section, V. perglobator recorded only from the USA [1,5], sperm packet development in male spheroids is not continuous (old male spheroids contain only matured sperm packets), and spines of the zygotes are blunt (S1 Table). The remaining dioecious species of this section, V. prolificus, has only been recorded from India [1, 16]. In V. prolificus, eggs mature continuously from young to old stages of the parental female spheroid, and spines of the zygote walls are not acute [1, 16]. In addition, the present Japanese species was most closely related to V. rousseletii from South Africa in our phylogenetic analyses.

Conclusions

The present combined data set from field-collected and cultured materials of a Volvox species distributed in a Japanese lake demonstrated the occurrence of V. rousseletii, which has previously only been reported from Africa [1,6]. However, asexual and sexual spheroids of this Japanese alga are smaller than those of V. rousseletii reported from Africa (S1 Table). In addition, the Japanese alga is genetically different from the South African alga of the same species (Figs 4 and 5). Thus, the species range for V. rousseletii has been expanded based on the present study and more data are needed to resolve the biogeographical significance of the morphological and genetic variability within this species. Now, V. rousseletii is a unique dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox distributed in more than one continent, and fresh cultures of V. tousseletii originating from Japan and South Africa are available (Table 1). Additional dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox with intercontinental distribution and/or new species of this section may be revealed in further studies using both field-collected and cultured materials of this section growing in various freshwater habitats worldwide.

The secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) transcript of Volvox rousseletii from Japan, including the 3’ end of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 5’ end of the large subunit of rRNA (LSU rRNA).

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of helices of the secondary structure of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 2 transcripts between Volvox rousseletii from Japan and its related strain/species (Figs 4 and 5).

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of dioecious species originating from Japan and previously described dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

16 Jul 2019

PONE-D-19-17716

Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Dioecious “African Species” Volvox rousseletii (Chlorophyceae) in the Water Column of a Japanese Lake Based on Field-collected and Cultured Materials

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I agree with Reviewer 1 about the high quality and overall suitability of this manuscript for publication.  In your revision and rebuttal please respond to the critiques of Reviewer 1 with whom I also agree regarding the last section where the discussion of Spirogyra and Chloromonas seemed out of place, and the need for details of the KOD polymerase method to be elaborated in the Methods section.

One more minor point. In Fig. 1B there are asterisk symbols which are not mentioned in the legend.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Aug 30 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: "Funding: HN was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant number 16H02518) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grants/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:  "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript details the occurrence of Volvox rousseletii in Japan, the first time this species has been recorded outside of Africa. The manuscript is well written and is both concise and clear. The data presented is micrographs of laboratory cultivated asexual colonies, field collected sexual colonies, and phylogenetic analyses deriving from both asexual and sexual colonies (confirming that the sexual colonies do indeed correspond to the associated asexual strains). Overall the analyses are appropriate, the data recording is meticulous, the micrographs are excellent, and the paper should be published.

I have one major comment which should be addressed before publication. While the manuscript title, Abstract, and Introduction emphasizes the characterization of a species thought to be restricted to Africa, the Conclusions section instead emphasizes the challenge of characterizing sexual isolates in culture in Spirogyra and Chloromonas, other algae not previously mentioned. The Conclusions should be revised to address the novelty of this paper, the isolation of V. rousseletii in Japan as emphasized by the title, Abstract, and Introduction. The revised species range for V. rousseletii and availability of fresh cultures is worthwhile and should be emphasized. Similarly, the usage of KOD polymerase, an important methodological detail, should be moved to the Methods.

A few minor comments:

1. Hanschen et al 2018 Evol Eco Res published the psbC and rbcL sequences of Volvox perglobator (accession numbers KY489659 and KY489662), these should be included in Figure 5.

2. Page 5, last paragraph “Volvox” should be italicized when introducing VTAC media

3. The implementation of maximum parsimony for phylogenetic analyses is outdated and should be replaced by Bayesian analyses. This analysis can be implemented in MrBayes.

4. Page 9, please do not abbreviate CBCs.

5. Figure 1, the (*) and (b) are not specified in the legend for panels B and C.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

31 Jul 2019

PONE-D-19-17716

Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Dioecious “African Species” Volvox rousseletii (Chlorophyceae) in the Water Column of a Japanese Lake Based on Field-collected and Cultured Materials

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I agree with Reviewer 1 about the high quality and overall suitability of this manuscript for publication. In your revision and rebuttal please respond to the critiques of Reviewer 1 with whom I also agree regarding the last section where the discussion of Spirogyra and Chloromonas seemed out of place, and the need for details of the KOD polymerase method to be elaborated in the Methods section.

Responses: Based on the comments, the conclusion section has been drastically revised by deleting the discussion of Spirogyra and Chloromonas. Detailed methods of PCR with KOD polymerase have been described in Materials and Methods section of the revised manuscript.

One more minor point. In Fig. 1B there are asterisk symbols which are not mentioned in the legend.

Response: The asterisk symbols have been specified in the legend for Fig. 1B in the revised manuscript.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Aug 30 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: We have ensured that our revised manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: "Funding: HN was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant number 16H02518) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-grants/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Responses: I have removed any funding-related text from the revised manuscript. We would not like to update our Funding Statement "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Responses: I have included captions for our Supporting Information files at the end of our revised manuscript and updated any in-text citations to match accordingly. I have seen your Supporting Information guidelines

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript details the occurrence of Volvox rousseletii in Japan, the first time this species has been recorded outside of Africa. The manuscript is well written and is both concise and clear. The data presented is micrographs of laboratory cultivated asexual colonies, field collected sexual colonies, and phylogenetic analyses deriving from both asexual and sexual colonies (confirming that the sexual colonies do indeed correspond to the associated asexual strains). Overall the analyses are appropriate, the data recording is meticulous, the micrographs are excellent, and the paper should be published.

I have one major comment which should be addressed before publication. While the manuscript title, Abstract, and Introduction emphasizes the characterization of a species thought to be restricted to Africa, the Conclusions section instead emphasizes the challenge of characterizing sexual isolates in culture in Spirogyra and Chloromonas, other algae not previously mentioned. The Conclusions should be revised to address the novelty of this paper, the isolation of V. rousseletii in Japan as emphasized by the title, Abstract, and Introduction. The revised species range for V. rousseletii and availability of fresh cultures is worthwhile and should be emphasized. Similarly, the usage of KOD polymerase, an important methodological detail, should be moved to the Methods.

Responses: Based on the comments, the conclusion section has been drastically revised by deleting the discussion of the challenge of characterizing sexual isolates in culture in Spirogyra and Chloromonas. Revised species range for V. rousseletii and availability of fresh cultures from Japan have been discussed in the conclusion section of the revised manuscript. Detailed methods of PCR with KOD polymerase have been described in Materials and Methods section of the revised manuscript.

A few minor comments:

1. Hanschen et al 2018 Evol Eco Res published the psbC and rbcL sequences of Volvox perglobator (accession numbers KY489659 and KY489662), these should be included in Figure 5.

Responses: Based on the comment, the psbC and rbcL sequences Volvox perglobator (accession numbers KY489659 and KY489662) have been included in Figure 5 of the revised manuscript.

2. Page 5, last paragraph “Volvox” should be italicized when introducing VTAC media

Response: Done as suggested.

3. The implementation of maximum parsimony for phylogenetic analyses is outdated and should be replaced by Bayesian analyses. This analysis can be implemented in MrBayes.

Response: The maximum parsimony has been replaced by Bayesian analyses using MrBayes in Figures 4 and 5 of the revised manuscript.

4. Page 9, please do not abbreviate CBCs.

Response: Done as suggested.

5. Figure 1, the (*) and (b) are not specified in the legend for panels B and C.

Response: The (*) and (b) have been specified in the legend for panels B and C in the revised manuscript.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

13 Aug 2019

Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Dioecious “African Species” Volvox rousseletii (Chlorophyceae) in the Water Column of a Japanese Lake Based on Field-collected and Cultured Materials

PONE-D-19-17716R1

Dear Dr. Nozaki,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.  Congratulations on adding an interesting new set of isolates to the Volvox family.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Note that the revised manuscript file set did not include Table S1 which I assume did not change from the first submission. Please remember to send this file to the PLoS ONE editorial staff.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

James G. Umen, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

22 Aug 2019

PONE-D-19-17716R1

Morphological and Molecular Identification of the Dioecious “African Species” Volvox rousseletii (Chlorophyceae) in the Water Column of a Japanese Lake Based on Field-collected and Cultured Materials

Dear Dr. Nozaki:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. James G. Umen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE