Yue Jin1, Qing Zhang2, Jie-Xue Pan3, Fang-Fang Wang2, Fan Qu2. 1. The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 2. Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords:
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); apoptosis; case-control study; di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP); in vitro study; steroid production
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), which affects 5% to 12% of reproductive-aged
women,[1,2] is the leading
cause of sub-fecundity and anovulatory infertility, with characteristics of
hyperandrogenism, irregular menstruation, and ovulatory dysfunction.[3,4] Women with PCOS who have not
responded to first- or second-line ovulation induction therapies or who have
additional fertility factors can turn to in vitro fertilization (IVF).[5] However, pregnancy outcomes following IVF are not satisfactory because of
failed fertilization[6] and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.[7] Heterogeneous etiology, with genetic, environmental, clinical, and
biochemical factors, may be involved in PCOS phenotypes and compromised pregnancy outcomes.[8] Remarkably, PCOSpatients are thought to represent a subpopulation sensitive
to compounds that interfere with the endocrine system.[9] For instance, plasticizers such as bisphenol A (BPA) or phthalates, which are
endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), are possible environmental contributors to
PCOS pathogenesis.[10,11] Serum BPA may be involved in insulin resistance and
hyperandrogenism of PCOS.[12] The previously reported association of EDCs with menstrual disturbance,[13] reduced fecundability,[14] and adverse IVF outcomes[15] may have been affected by the inclusion of women with PCOS in these
studies.Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), is one of the most common EDCs and the most widely
used plasticizer indoors, and it can be found in cosmetics, toys, construction
materials, and cleaning solutions.[16] Concerns have been raised that DEHP is continuously released and exposed in
the environment during the use of plastic products.[17] DEHP can be absorbed by food and water from contact materials[18] and is contained in many medical devices.[19] Thus, humans can be exposed to DEHP through oral ingestion, inhalation, and
dermal exposure. Furthermore, DEHP is able to cross the placenta, as DEHP and its
metabolites have been detected in amniotic fluid, which may result in exposure risk
to the developing fetus.[20] With the potential to cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, DEHP has
shown adverse effects on sexual maturation, fertility, pregnancy, and the female
reproductive tract.[21]
In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that
exposure to DEHP impairs folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation in rodents and
induces epigenetic changes in germ cells that can be transmitted to subsequent
generations.[22,23]A few studies have explored the relationship between PCOS and exposure to EDCs
(mainly BPA). Considering the high prevalence of PCOS and the potential reproductive
toxicity caused by DEHP, we hypothesized that exposure to DEHP may be involved in
PCOS and might relate to some of the negative effects on reproduction. The aim of
the study was to measure DEHP levels in follicular fluid (FF) of women with and
without PCOS and to explore the association of DEHP level with pregnancy outcome in
women with PCOS undergoing IVF. Furthermore, as this study aimed to explore the
mechanisms underlying the action of DEHP, we also investigated the in
vitro effects of DEHP exposure on human granulosa cells (GCs) and the
steroidogenic human granulosa-like tumor cell line KGN.
Materials and methods
Participants
The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of School of
Medicine, Zhejiang University (Ethics Committee reference number 20170047), and
informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Fifty-six infertile
women with PCOS and 51 infertile women with tubal blockage (who served as
controls) were recruited into this case-control pilot study. Human GCs were
collected from an additional 22 infertile women with tubal blockage for the
in vitro study. The women with PCOS were diagnosed
according to the revised 2003 Rotterdam criteria, indicating PCOS to be present
if at least two of the following three criteria are met: oligo- or anovulation,
clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries
viewed on an ultrasound.[24] Inclusion criteria were 20 to 45 years of age, a body mass index (BMI)
≤35, and undergoing IVF. Women with possible ovarian tumors, congenital adrenal
hyperplasia, Cushing’s syndrome, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease were
excluded. The control subjects had regular menstrual cycles and normal sex
hormone levels. No structural abnormalities of the uterus and ovaries were found
by vaginal ultrasound or laparoscopy in any of the women. All partners of the
women had normal spermiograms and sperm morphology.All of the women were referred to our department for IVF. They received the long
agonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, with administration of
recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH, Gonal-F; Serono International
S.A., Geneva, Switzerland) after being downregulated with triptorelin (Serono
International S.A.). The dosages of gonadotropins were individualized according
to serum estradiol levels and transvaginal ultrasound measurements of the
follicles. When at least one of the follicles reached a diameter of 18 mm,
10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (Libao Biochemistry Co., Zhuhai,
China) was administered 36 hours before ultrasound-guided follicle
aspiration.
Sample collection
Peripheral blood was collected on day 3 of a natural menstrual cycle or during
withdrawal bleeding. The serum was separated by centrifugation at
3000 × g for 10 minutes and stored at −80°C until
measurement of FSH, luteinizing hormone (LH), total testosterone (TT), and
estradiol (E2). Follicular fluid and ovarian GCs were collected from women on
retrieval day. The FF was sampled by a transvaginal ultrasound-guided puncture
and aspiration of 16- to 18-mm-diameter follicles. Fluid collected from a single
dominant follicle of the first aspirated follicle of each ovary that did not
contain any visible blood contamination was used in this study. The FF samples
were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1300 × g to isolate GCs. The
supernatants were stored at −80°C before DEHP concentrations were measured. The
human GCs contained in the pellet were purified using Percoll gradient
centrifugation to remove red blood cells and cellular debris. If red blood cells
were not clearly removed, red blood cell lysis buffer (Biosharp, Hefei, China)
was added at a 4:1 ratio for 3 to 5 minutes at 4°C. The collected GCs were used
for the in vitro DEHP exposure study.
Measuring DEHP in FF
FF samples used for the detection of DEHP were prepared by adding 200 µL of
0.5 mol/L (pH 5.5) sodium acetate solution to 200 µL of FF sample. After the
samples were vortexed for 1 hour at room temperature, 800 µL of ethyl
acetate:hexane (60:40, v:v) was added, and the samples were mixed for 2 minutes.
To perform liquid-liquid extraction, the samples were centrifuged at
5000 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature; then, the
upper layer was removed (640 µL) and added to a 1.5-mL centrifuge tube. Next,
800 µL of ethyl acetate:hexane (60:40, v:v) was added to the lower layer and
mixed for 3 minutes, centrifuged at 4000 × g for 15 minutes at
room temperature and, again, the upper layer was removed (720 µL). The two
extraction solutions were combined, and the solution was separated into two
tubes, 680 µL/tube, and vacuum dried. Then, an acetonitrile:water solution
(50:50, v:v) was added, the samples were vortexed, centrifuged at
15,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was
subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis.
Eight microliters of sample was injected. A quality control sample was prepared
in parallel and tested at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the
experiment. The LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using an LC-ESI (QSTAR Elite;
Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) mass spectrometer.[25] Data analysis was performed using Analyst QS Software 2.0 (Applied
Biosystems/MDS Sciex) to extract the peak area of ion pair 228.27.
Cell culture and exposure to DEHP
Primary-cultured human GCs were isolated from the FF of 22 women with tubal
blockage who were undergoing IVF. The human GCs were cultured in RPMI-1640
medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% inactivated fetal
bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), and 100 U/mL of penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at
37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The KGN cells were
kindly provided by the laboratory of Professor Fan Jin (Women’s Hospital, School
of Medicine, Zhejiang University). The KGN cells have similar properties to
human GCs, including the expression of functional follicle-stimulating hormone
(FSH) receptor and relatively high aromatase activity.[26] KGN cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco)
supplemented with 10% inactivated FBS and 100 U/mL of penicillin/streptomycin at
37°C in a humidified atmosphere, with 5% CO2. Human GCs and KGN cells
were seeded respectively at 2 × 105 cells per well in six-well plates
and cultured for 24 hours before DEHP (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis,
MO) exposure. The medium containing 0 (as control) or 10 nM DEHP was added
separately to the cells for 24, 48, or 72 hours.
Measurement of steroid hormone production
After DEHP exposure for 24 hours, the supernatant of human GCs culture medium was
collected. The levels of testosterone, androstenedione, estradiol, and estrone
in the supernatant were detected by LC-MS/MS.
Western blotting analysis
Primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells were lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate
buffer after exposure to DEHP for 24 hours. A bicinchoninic acid assay kit
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the protein
concentration. Protein lysates were loaded, separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and
electro-transferred onto a polyvinyl difluoride membrane (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked for 2 hours at
room temperature with 5% skimmed milk in Tris buffered saline-Tween (10 mM Tris,
pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween-20), and then probed with primary
antibodies against CYP19A1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:2000), CYP17A1 (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, 1:1500), and an internal control, GAPDH (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, 1:3000). After incubation with their corresponding secondary
antibody, the signals were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham
Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The densitometric intensity was measured
using a GS-800 densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). CYP17A1
catalyzes two oxidase reactions and leads to the conversion of pregnenolone and
progesterone into C19 steroids, such as androstenedione, whereas CYP19A1 can
catalyze either androstenedione or testosterone, yielding estrone or estradiol, respectively.[27]
Cell viability assay
For cell viability analysis, 100 µL of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
were seeded in 96-well plates at 7000 cells per well and incubated overnight.
For a better observation of cell viability over time, cells were under 0
(control) and 10 nM of DEHP treatment for 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively, and
then cell viability was analyzed using an MTT assay kit (cell proliferation)
(Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, after
the cell cultures were exposed to DEHP, 10 µL of 5 mg/mL MTT solution was added
to the culture of each well. The cells were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 4
hours, and absorbance was measured using a microplate reader at a wavelength of
492 nm (A492). Cell viability rate (%) was calculated by the ratio of A492 in
the DEHP exposure group to A492 in the untreated, control group.
Cell cycle assay
For cell cycle analysis, primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells treated with
DEHP were plated in 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells per well and
incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. The cells were then collected, washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed with 70% cold ethanol at 4°C
overnight. Then, 50 µg/mL propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co.) with
100 µg/mL RNaseA was added to the cells at 4°C in the dark for 30 minutes. The
cell cycle distribution was analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton
Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Apoptosis analysis
To assess whether DEHP had an apoptotic effect, apoptotic cells were determined
by annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining, and the rate of apoptosis was
assessed using flow cytometry analysis. After exposure to DEHP for 48 hours,
primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells were collected and washed with PBS,
incubated with annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate for 15 minutes and
counterstained with PI for 10 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Apoptotic
cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson).
Real-time quantitative PCR analysis
Expression levels of caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8, caspase-9, and Bcl-2 mRNA
in both primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells were analyzed with real-time
quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). After DEHP exposure for 24 hours, total RNA was
extracted from human GCs and KGN cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to a standard protocol. The concentration and
quality of the RNA samples were evaluated using a NanoDrop ND-100
spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reverse transcription was
performed with the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Perfect Real Time, TaKaRa,
Dalian, China) following standard protocols. Quantitative PCR was performed
using the Applied Biosystems 7500 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primers
specific for caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8, caspase-9, Bcl-2, and GAPDH genes
for humans were provided by Sangon Biological Engineering Technology (Shanghai,
China). PCR reactions were performed using 2 µL of cDNA, 10 µM each primer, 50×
ROX reference dye II, and 2× SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa) in 20-µL reactions. The
thermal cycler protocol was as follows: 95°C for 30 seconds, followed by 40
cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 34 seconds. The experiment was
repeated three times. The cycle threshold (Ct) value for GAPDH
mRNA was subtracted from that of the target gene, and the relative mRNA
expression levels of target genes to GAPDH were expressed as
2−ΔΔCt.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (quartiles), or n
(%). A Shapiro–Wilk test was conducted to determine the normal distribution of
raw or logarithmically transformed data. Differences between the two groups were
examined using Student’s t-test for normally or lognormally
distributed data or Pearson’s Chi-squared (χ2) test for categorical
data. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed for the non-normally distributed
data. Comparisons of multiple groups were conducted with analysis of variance
(ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests. A two-tailed
P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Statistical analyses were carried out with SAS software (version 9.4; SAS
Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego,
CA, USA).
Results
DEHP levels in human follicular fluid
The FF from women with PCOS had significantly higher levels of DEHP (n = 56;
geometric mean: 1.68 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.27–2.13) than that of
women in the control group (n = 51; geometric mean: 1.21 ng/mL, 95% confidence
interval: 1.06–1.38) (P < 0.01; Figure 1). The women with PCOS whose FF
DEHP levels were greater than the geometric mean were defined as the H-DEHPPCOS
group (n = 27); those with levels lower than the geometric mean were included in
the N-H-DEHPPCOS group (n = 29).
Figure 1.
Concentrations of DEHP in FF of women with PCOS and controls. The data
are shown as mean ± SD. The red horizontal line represents the geometric
mean. **P < 0.01 versus the control by Student’s
t-test. DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; FF,
follicular fluid; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
Concentrations of DEHP in FF of women with PCOS and controls. The data
are shown as mean ± SD. The red horizontal line represents the geometric
mean. **P < 0.01 versus the control by Student’s
t-test. DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; FF,
follicular fluid; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
Clinical characteristics of participants
There were no significant differences among the control, H-DEHPPCOS, and
N-H-DEHPPCOSwomen for body mass index, duration of infertility, estradiol
levels, dosage of rFSH administered, or induction length. No significant
differences were found between women in the H-DEHPPCOS and N-H-DEHPPCOS groups
in the abovementioned clinical characteristics. However, women in H-DEHPPCOS
and N-H-DEHPPCOS groups did differ in LH/FSH ratio, TT levels on day 3 of
spontaneous menstrual cycle, and the number of oocytes compared with women in
the control group (all P < 0.05; Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of women with PCOS and high or low levels of
DEHP in follicular fluid (H-DEHP PCOS, N-H-DEHP PCOS) and controls
(women without PCOS).
Items
Control (n = 51)
N-H-DEHP PCOS (n = 29)
H-DEHP PCOS (n = 27)
Age (years)
31.59 ± 4.44
29.0 ± 3.22*
29.93 ± 3.56
BMI (kg/m2)
22.44 ± 3.08
23.23 ± 3.32
22.41 ± 3.12
Duration of infertility (years)
4.0 (2.0–7.0)
4.0 (2.0–7.0)
3.0 (2.0–6.0)
LH/FSH
0.66 (0.54–0.97)
0.89 (0.71–1.80)*
1.40 (0.70–3.36)*
Day 3 TT (nmol/L)
1.01 ± 0.48
1.56 ± 0.76*
1.34 ± 0.68*
Day 3 estradiol (pmol/L)
107.24 (70.84–169.50)
83.92 (55.27–126.16)
98.68 (62.58–146.36)
rFSH administered (IU)
2175 (1650–3300)
2050 (1650–2625)
2100 (1800–2700)
Induction length (days)
10 (9–11)
11 (9–12)
10 (9–12)
Number of oocytes
10.27 ± 3.56
12.9 ± 4.04*
12.37 ± 3.46*
Clinical pregnancy ratea
24 (47.06)
10 (34.48)
6 (22.22)*
Note: aClinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a
gestational sac with the heartbeat visualized by ultrasound 4–6
weeks after embryo transfer. Data are shown as mean ± SD, median
(quartiles) or n (%). *P < 0.05 versus the control by Student’s
t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or
χ2 test. DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; PCOS,
polycystic ovary syndrome; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH,
luteinizing hormone; Day 3, third day of spontaneous menstrual
cycle; rFSH, recombinant FSH; TT, total testosterone.
Clinical characteristics of women with PCOS and high or low levels of
DEHP in follicular fluid (H-DEHPPCOS, N-H-DEHPPCOS) and controls
(women without PCOS).Note: aClinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a
gestational sac with the heartbeat visualized by ultrasound 4–6
weeks after embryo transfer. Data are shown as mean ± SD, median
(quartiles) or n (%). *P < 0.05 versus the control by Student’s
t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or
χ2 test. DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; PCOS,
polycystic ovary syndrome; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH,
luteinizing hormone; Day 3, third day of spontaneous menstrual
cycle; rFSH, recombinant FSH; TT, total testosterone.The clinical pregnancy rates of the control, N-H-DEHPPCOS, and H-DEHPPCOSwomen
were 47.06%, 34.48%, and 22.22%, respectively. The pregnancy rate was
significantly lower in H-DEHPPCOSwomen than in controls (P = 0.032; Table 1).
Effects of DEHP on steroid production of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN
cells
The levels of testosterone and androsterone in the supernatant of primary-culture
medium with DEHP exposure were significantly higher than those of the control
(both P < 0.05). No significant differences existed in the levels of estrone
or estradiol between primary-culture medium with DEHP exposure and the control
(Table 2).
Table 2.
The levels of steroid hormones in primary-culture medium detected by
LC-MS/MS.
Steroid hormone
Primary-culture control
Primary-culture DEHP
Testosterone (pg/mL)
134.14 ± 15.75
232.08 ± 22.81*
Estrone (pg/mL)
15.82 ± 3.27
17.61 ± 2.55
Estradiol (pg/mL)
3.00 ± 0.45
3.23 ± 0.41
Androsterone (pg/mL)
14.40 ± 0.62
22.04 ± 0.94*
Note: Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control, by
Student’s t-test. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
The levels of steroid hormones in primary-culture medium detected by
LC-MS/MS.Note: Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control, by
Student’s t-test. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.The ratios of estradiol to testosterone and estrone to androsterone were
significantly lower in the primary-culture medium exposed to DEHP compared with
the control (both P < 0.05; Figure 2a). The mRNA expression level of CYP19A1 in
human GCs following DEHP exposure was significantly lower than in control cells
(P < 0.05; Figure
2b). The protein expression of CYP19A1 was significantly lower in both
primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells after exposure to DEHP compared with
the controls (both P < 0.05; Figure 2c). The mRNA and protein expression of CYP17A1 was
significantly higher in both primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells after
exposure to DEHP compared with controls (all P < 0.05; Figure 2b and 2c).
Figure 2.
Effects of DEHP on steroid production of primary-cultured human GCs and
KGN cells. (a) The ratios of E2 to T and E1 to A in the supernatant of
primary-culture medium. (b) mRNA expression levels of
CYP19A1 and CYP17A1 in
primary-cultured human GCs or KGN cells. (c) Protein expression levels
of CYP19A1 and CYP17A1 in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells. Data
are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control by ANOVA,
#P < 0.05, KGN DEHP versus PC DEHP by ANOVA. PC,
primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human granulosa-like
tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; T, testosterone; E1,
estrone; E2, estradiol; A, androsterone.
Effects of DEHP on steroid production of primary-cultured human GCs and
KGN cells. (a) The ratios of E2 to T and E1 to A in the supernatant of
primary-culture medium. (b) mRNA expression levels of
CYP19A1 and CYP17A1 in
primary-cultured human GCs or KGN cells. (c) Protein expression levels
of CYP19A1 and CYP17A1 in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells. Data
are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus control by ANOVA,
#P < 0.05, KGN DEHP versus PCDEHP by ANOVA. PC,
primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human granulosa-like
tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; T, testosterone; E1,
estrone; E2, estradiol; A, androsterone.
Effect of DEHP on cell viability, cell cycle, and cell apoptosis
Cell viability analysis showed that exposure of primary-cultured human GCs and
KGN cells to DEHP for 24, 48, and 72 hours led to a significant decrease in
viability compared with controls (all P < 0.05; Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Effect of DEHP on viability of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
measured by MTT assay. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus
control by Student’s t-test. PC, primary-cultured human
GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP,
di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Effect of DEHP on viability of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
measured by MTT assay. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus
control by Student’s t-test. PC, primary-cultured human
GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP,
di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.Cell cycle analysis showed that the proportion of KGN cells in G1
phase was significantly higher after exposure to DEHP compared with the KGN
control (P < 0.05), whereas the proportions of primary-cultured human GCs and
KGN cells in S phase were lower after DEHP exposure compared with the controls
(both P < 0.05). The G2/M phase was not influenced by DEHP
exposure. These results showed that in vitro DEHP treatment
arrested primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells in the G1 phase and
stopped them from entering the S phase (Figure 4a and 4b).
Figure 4.
Effect of DEHP on cell cycle of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Flow cytometry results. The vertical and
horizontal axis indicate cell numbers and cell division cycle,
respectively. (b) Histogram. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05
versus control by ANOVA, #P < 0.05, KGN DEHP versus PC
DEHP group by ANOVA. PC, primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic
human granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate.
Effect of DEHP on cell cycle of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Flow cytometry results. The vertical and
horizontal axis indicate cell numbers and cell division cycle,
respectively. (b) Histogram. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05
versus control by ANOVA, #P < 0.05, KGN DEHP versus PCDEHP group by ANOVA. PC, primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic
human granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate.Cell apoptosis analysis showed that the rates of late, early, and total
(late + early) apoptosis of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells were
significantly increased after exposure to DEHP compared with controls (all
P < 0.05, Figure 5a).
The mRNA expression levels of caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-9 were
significantly higher in KGN cells after exposure to DEHP compared with controls
(all P < 0.05), whereas the mRNA expression of Bcl-2 was significantly lower
in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells after exposure to DEHP compared with
controls (both P < 0.05) (Figure 5b).
Figure 5.
Effect of DEHP on cell of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells. (a)
Annexin V flow cytometry assay was performed to analyze cell apoptosis.
The vertical and horizontal axes indicate PI- and FITC-positive areas,
respectively. Identified by flow cytometry, cells were divided into four
sections: UL (annexin V-FITC− PI+) was representative of mechanical
error; UR (annexin V-FITC+ PI+) was representative of late apoptosis or
necrosis cells; LL (annexin V-FITC− PI−) was representative of living
cells; LR (annexin V-FITC+ PI−) was representative of early apoptosis
cells. (b) mRNA expression levels of caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8,
caspase-9, and Bcl-2 in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
measured using real-time quantitative PCR. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
*P < 0.05 versus control by ANOVA, #P < 0.05, KGN DEHP
versus PC DEHP group by ANOVA. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate, PC, primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human
granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Effect of DEHP on cell of primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells. (a)
Annexin V flow cytometry assay was performed to analyze cell apoptosis.
The vertical and horizontal axes indicate PI- and FITC-positive areas,
respectively. Identified by flow cytometry, cells were divided into four
sections: UL (annexin V-FITC− PI+) was representative of mechanical
error; UR (annexin V-FITC+ PI+) was representative of late apoptosis or
necrosis cells; LL (annexin V-FITC− PI−) was representative of living
cells; LR (annexin V-FITC+ PI−) was representative of early apoptosis
cells. (b) mRNA expression levels of caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8,
caspase-9, and Bcl-2 in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN cells
measured using real-time quantitative PCR. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
*P < 0.05 versus control by ANOVA, #P < 0.05, KGN DEHP
versus PCDEHP group by ANOVA. PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate, PC, primary-cultured human GCs; KGN, steroidogenic human
granulosa-like tumor cell line; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Discussion
The current study provided population-based evidence regarding the role of organic
pollutants in female reproductive health; we found increased levels of DEHP in the
FF of PCOSwomen, which may be associated with the reduced clinical pregnancy rate
when women with PCOS undergo IVF. This study also demonstrated that in
vitro DEHP treatment altered steroid production, decreased viability
and proliferation, and increased apoptosis in primary-cultured human GCs and KGN
cells.The profile of PCOS, including alterations in both endocrine and reproductive
aspects, may indicate that women with PCOS represent a sensitive subpopulation for
EDC exposure.[9] EDCs represent a group of widespread pollutants that may act as possible
environmental contributors to the pathogenesis of PCOS.[10,28] Previous studies have shown
that DEHP exposure is associated with PCOS characteristics such as altered hormone concentrations,[29] cessation of ovulation,[30] and polycystic ovarian morphology.[29] Prenatal exposure to DEHP that reduces female fertility in a
transgenerational manner[31] may contribute to altered fetal programming and be involved in the
pathogenesis of PCOS.[32] Although the mechanism has not been fully elucidated, animal studies have
shown that DEHP exposure reduces reproductive functions accompanying changes in sex
hormone concentrations and granulosa cell apoptosis,[33] disrupts primordial folliculogenesis by inducing autophagy in perinatal ovaries,[34] and leads to dysfunction of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis[35] and altered pulsatile LH secretion.[36]According to the traditional two-cell theory of human ovarian steroidogenesis,
CYP17A1 expression in the ovary is limited to the theca cells, which are the site of
androgen production. Granulosa cells do not express CYP17A1 but express CYP19A1 for
estradiol production;[37] however, studies suggest that human luteinized granulosa cells in culture do
express CYP17A1.[38-40] It was
reported that C-fos, the AP-1 transcription factor, may inhibit the expression of
CYP17A1 and hence suppress the production of androstenedione.[41] The steroidogenic pathway and the expression of CYP17A1 in the cultured
granulosa cells may be affected by several factors, such as the stage of follicular
development, the state of the preovulatory granulosa cell in vivo,[42] and the in vitro cell culture system.[39] In this study, the results of the in vitro experiment showed
that human GCs had altered steroid hormone production after exposure to DEHP. The
decreased ratios of estradiol to testosterone and of estrone to androsterone, as
well as the increased androstenedione level after DEHP exposure, indicated reduced
CYP19A1 activity and enhanced CYP17A1 activity.[43] These findings were further supported by DEHP’s inhibition of CYP19A1
expression and upregulation of CYP17A1 expression in both primary human GCs and KGN
cells. Thus, DEHP affects sex steroid hormone production by altering expression of
steroid hormone–associated synthases, which supports the previously reported effects
of DEHP and its metabolite on steroid production, which resulted from suppressed
transcript levels of aromatase in animal and human GCs.[44,45]DEHP causes an imbalance in cellular proliferation and apoptosis that is associated
with the inhibition of the cell cycle and alteration of apoptosis-associated gene
expression, which may drive the development of abnormal reproductive functions of PCOS.[46] The caspase family of proteins, including caspase-3, caspase-7, and
caspase-9, which are involved in the caspase cascade responsible for executing cell death,[47] were found to have an upregulated transcript level in KGN cells after DEHP
exposure, whereas Bcl-2, an anti-apoptosis factor and an important regulator of
programmed cell death,[48] was downregulated in both primary human GCs and KGN cells. Similarly,
previous studies reported that DEHP treatment arrested mouse GCs at the
G0/G1 phase[33] and resulted in the increased cell apoptosis,[33,45] and that exposure to DEHP or
its metabolite induced a decrease in cell viability and promoted apoptosis of rat
GCs through increasing caspase-3 activity and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio.[49,50]To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure the concentration of DEHP in
follicular fluid of women with PCOS. Follicular fluid serves as a medium for
communication between oocytes and follicular cells, and it provides the
microenvironment for developing oocytes.[51] Thus, increased DEHP levels in follicular fluids of women with PCOS found in
this study may reflect changes in the ovarian follicular microenvironment and may be
associated with the impaired reproductive functions in PCOS. A strength of the study
lies in the LC-MS/MS method used to measure the DEHP level in follicular fluids and
steroid hormones in cell culture supernatant. With high selectivity and sensitivity,
LC-MS/MS is becoming established as the instrument of choice for determining
metabolites of phthalates in biological samples[52,53] and of steroid hormones.[54] Conversely, the study was limited by the small sample size and an
insufficient follow-up period. The potential mechanism of DEHP action in the
pathogenesis of PCOS needs further investigation. The effects of DEHP on aromatase
activity need to be further explored by adding testosterone or androsterone as
substrate.In summary, the clinical data in this study support the hypothesis that exposure to
DEHP is involved in PCOS pathogenesis and in the adverse pregnancy outcomes of women
with PCOS who undergo IVF. Our in vitro findings add to our
understanding of how DEHP affects reproductive functions in women with PCOS. To
fully assess the hazard of DEHP to humans, further studies are needed to confirm the
role of DEHP exposure in the pathogenesis of PCOS and explore the underlying
mechanism. If confirmed, protective strategies and strong recommendations should be
considered to reduce human exposure to protect female reproduction from adverse
health effects.[11]
Conclusions
Women with PCOS are exposed to increased levels of DEHP in follicles, which may be
involved in pregnancy loss when undergoing IVF. The mechanisms underlying DEHP
action may be related to disturbance of steroid production, balance of cellular
proliferation, and apoptosis in GCs.
Authors: Y Nishi; T Yanase; Y Mu; K Oba; I Ichino; M Saito; M Nomura; C Mukasa; T Okabe; K Goto; R Takayanagi; Y Kashimura; M Haji; H Nawata Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Hanno C Erythropel; Milan Maric; Jim A Nicell; Richard L Leask; Viviane Yargeau Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J Lyngsø; C H Ramlau-Hansen; B B Høyer; H Støvring; J P Bonde; B A G Jönsson; C H Lindh; H S Pedersen; J K Ludwicki; V Zviezdai; G Toft Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Adam H Balen; Lara C Morley; Marie Misso; Stephen Franks; Richard S Legro; Chandrika N Wijeyaratne; Elisabet Stener-Victorin; Bart C J M Fauser; Robert J Norman; Helena Teede Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 15.610