| Literature DB >> 31709784 |
Xing-Han Chen1, Sen Yang2, Wei Yang1, Yuan-Yuan Si1, Rui-Wen Xu1, Bin Fan1, Le Wang3, Zi-Ning Meng4,5.
Abstract
Tylorrhynchus heterochaetus is a widespread benthic polychaete worm found in coastal brackish waters of the west Pacific. It has high ecological and economic value as a biomarker of water quality and as a high-quality feed in aquaculture and fisheries and is considered a delicacy in some areas of Asia. However, it has experienced a marked reduction in recent years due to overexploitation as well as changes in the environment and climate. Here, to comprehensively understand its genetic background and thus provide insights for better conservation and utilization of this species, we assessed the genetic variability and demographic history of T. heterochaetus individuals sampled from eight locations along the coasts of southeast China and north Vietnam based on mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I ( COI) sequences. We observed high haplotype diversity ( Hd), with an average of 0.926, but relatively low nucleotide diversity ( π), with a mean of 0.032 across all samples. A total of 94 polymorphic sites and 85 haplotypes were identified among 320 individuals. The pairwise genetic distances among haplotypes ranged from 0.001 to 0.067, with the high intraspecific divergence possibly reflecting geographic isolation and gene pool fragmentation. Significant genetic structures were revealed among the studied locations; specifically, the eight locations could be treated as six genetically different populations based on pairwise Φ ST results (0.026-0.951, P<0.01). A significant pattern of isolation-by-distance was detected between the genetic and geographic distances ( r=0.873, P=0.001). Three geographic lineages were defined based on phylogenetic tree and network analyses of COI haplotypes. AMOVA results indicated that genetic variations mainly occurred among the three lineages (89.96%). Tests of neutrality and mismatch distribution suggested that T. heterochaetus underwent recent population expansion. These results provide the first report on the genetic status of T. heterochaetus and will be valuable for the management of genetic resources and better understanding of the ecology and evolution in this species.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic history; Genetic diversity; Mitochondrial DNA; Population structure; Tylorrhynchus heterochaetus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31709784 PMCID: PMC6956720 DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zool Res ISSN: 2095-8137
1Sampling locations of T. heterochaetus used in this study (indicated by solid cycles)
Sampling information on T. heterochaetus in this study
| Location code | Locality | Country | Sample size ( | Longitude (E) | Latitude (N) |
| WZ | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | China | 40 | 121°18’ | 28°38’ |
| FA | Fu’an, Fujian | China | 40 | 119°40’ | 26°59’ |
| FZ | Fuzhou, Fujian | China | 40 | 119°18’ | 25°58’ |
| YJ | Yangjiang, Guangdong | China | 40 | 112°02’ | 21°51’ |
| ZS | Zhongshan, Guangdong | China | 40 | 113°21’ | 22°15’ |
| QZ | Qinzhou, Guangxi | China | 40 | 108°29’ | 21°56’ |
| HP | Hai Phong | Vietnam | 40 | 106°35’ | 20°43’ |
| ND | Nam Dịnh | Vietnam | 40 | 106°22’ | 20°20’ |
Genetic diversity of eight T. heterochaetus locations based on COI gene sequences
| Location (lineage) | ||||||
| WZ | 40 | 32 | 23 | 0.949 | 0.009 12 | 6.465 |
| FA | 40 | 13 | 10 | 0.776 | 0.004 74 | 3.362 |
| FZ | 40 | 16 | 13 | 0.783 | 0.004 70 | 3.329 |
| ZS | 40 | 18 | 6 | 0.237 | 0.001 27 | 0.900 |
| YJ | 40 | 12 | 13 | 0.654 | 0.001 40 | 0.994 |
| QZ | 40 | 11 | 10 | 0.441 | 0.001 04 | 0.735 |
| HP | 40 | 17 | 16 | 0.645 | 0.001 59 | 1.124 |
| ND | 40 | 7 | 8 | 0.618 | 0.001 05 | 0.744 |
| Lineage A | 120 | 42 | 39 | 0.861 | 0.007 11 | 5.043 |
| Lineage B | 80 | 29 | 18 | 0.660 | 0.001 75 | 1.239 |
| Lineage C | 120 | 29 | 29 | 0.767 | 0.002 74 | 1.942 |
| Overall | 320 | 94 | 85 | 0.926 | 0.032 15 | 22.794 |
Pairwise Ф (below diagonal) and genetic distance (above diagonal) among different T. heterochaetus locations
| Location code | WZ | FA | FZ | ZS | YJ | QZ | HP | ND |
| WZ | − | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.060 |
| FA | − | 0.005 | 0.059 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.063 | 0.063 | |
| FZ | −0.013 | − | 0.059 | 0.058 | 0.062 | 0.063 | 0.063 | |
| ZS | − | 0.002 | 0.020 | 0.019 | 0.019 | |||
| YJ | − | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.021 | ||||
| QZ | − | 0.005 | 0.005 | |||||
| HP | − | 0.001 | ||||||
| ND | 0.017 | − | ||||||
2Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of T. heterochaetus based on COI haplotypes
3Median-joining network of T. heterochaetus based on COI haplotypes
AMOVA results of T. heterochaetus based on mtDNA
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance component | Percentage of variation (%) | Fixation indices | |
| *: | |||||
| Among lineages | 2 | 3171.121 | 14.871 Va | 89.86 | |
| Among populations within lineages | 5 | 120.279 | 0.573 Vb | 3.47 | |
| Within populations | 312 | 344.225 | 1.103 Vc | 6.67 | |
| Total | 319 | 3635.625 | 16.548 | ||
Parameters of neutrality test and mismatch distribution analysis for six T. heterochaetus populations
| Population | Neutrality test | Mismatch distribution analysis | Expansion time | |||||
| Tajima’s | Fu’s | Tau ( | ||||||
| *: | ||||||||
| WZ | –0.486 | –7.786** | 0.023 | 0.024 | 6.425 | 0.113 | ||
| FA+FZ | –0.395 | –5.076* | 0.052 | 0.123 | 4.834 | 0.085 | ||
| ZS | –2.571** | –1.607 | 0.002 | 0.408 | 13.936 | 0.246 | ||
| YJ | –1.995** | –11.090** | 0.001 | 0.06 | 1.062 | 0.019 | ||
| QZ | –2.172** | –7.960** | 0.000 1 | 0.124 | 1.103 | 0.019 | ||
| HP+ND | –2.333** | –24.297** | 0.003 | 0.081 | 0.969 | 0.017 | ||