David J Graham1, Elande Baro2, Rongmei Zhang2, Jiemin Liao3, Michael Wernecke3, Marsha E Reichman4, Mao Hu3, Onyekachukwu Illoh4, Yuqin Wei3, Margie R Goulding4, Yoganand Chillarige3, Mary Ross Southworth5, Thomas E MaCurdy6, Jeffrey A Kelman7. 1. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Electronic address: david.graham1@fda.hhs.gov. 2. Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md. 3. Acumen LLC, Burlingame, Calif. 4. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 5. Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md. 6. Acumen LLC, Burlingame, Calif; Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. 7. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Washington, DC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are alternatives to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Randomized trials compared NOACs with warfarin, but none have compared individual NOACs against each other for safety and effectiveness. METHODS: We performed a retrospective new-user cohort study of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation enrolled in US Medicare who initiated warfarin (n = 183,318), or a standard dose of dabigatran (150 mg twice daily; n = 86,198), rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily; n = 106,389), or apixaban (5 mg twice daily; n = 73,039) between October 2010 and September 2015. Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcomes of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, and all-cause mortality, comparing each NOAC with warfarin, and with each other NOAC. RESULTS: Compared with warfarin, each NOAC was associated with reduced risks of thromboembolic stroke (20%-29% reduction; P = .002 [dabigatran], P < 0.001 [rivaroxaban, apixaban]), intracranial hemorrhage (35%-62% reduction; P < 0.001 [each NOAC]), and mortality (19%-34% reduction; P < .001 [each NOAC]). The NOACs were similar for thromboembolic stroke but rivaroxaban was associated with increased risks of intracranial hemorrhage (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.35-2.17), major extracranial bleeding (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.45; vs apixaban: HR = 2.70; 95% CI, 2.38-3.05), and death (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24; vs apixaban: HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38). Dabigatran was associated with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage (HR = 0.70; 95% CI ,0.53-0.94) and increased risk of major extracranial bleeding (HR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.78-2.32) compared with apixaban. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with standard-dose NOAC for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and warfarin users with similar baseline characteristics, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were associated with a more favorable benefit-harm profile than warfarin. Among NOAC users, dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a more favorable benefit-harm profile than rivaroxaban.
BACKGROUND: Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are alternatives to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Randomized trials compared NOACs with warfarin, but none have compared individual NOACs against each other for safety and effectiveness. METHODS: We performed a retrospective new-user cohort study of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation enrolled in US Medicare who initiated warfarin (n = 183,318), or a standard dose of dabigatran (150 mg twice daily; n = 86,198), rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily; n = 106,389), or apixaban (5 mg twice daily; n = 73,039) between October 2010 and September 2015. Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcomes of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, and all-cause mortality, comparing each NOAC with warfarin, and with each other NOAC. RESULTS: Compared with warfarin, each NOAC was associated with reduced risks of thromboembolic stroke (20%-29% reduction; P = .002 [dabigatran], P < 0.001 [rivaroxaban, apixaban]), intracranial hemorrhage (35%-62% reduction; P < 0.001 [each NOAC]), and mortality (19%-34% reduction; P < .001 [each NOAC]). The NOACs were similar for thromboembolic stroke but rivaroxaban was associated with increased risks of intracranial hemorrhage (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.35-2.17), major extracranial bleeding (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.45; vs apixaban: HR = 2.70; 95% CI, 2.38-3.05), and death (vs dabigatran: HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24; vs apixaban: HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38). Dabigatran was associated with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage (HR = 0.70; 95% CI ,0.53-0.94) and increased risk of major extracranial bleeding (HR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.78-2.32) compared with apixaban. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with standard-dose NOAC for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and warfarin users with similar baseline characteristics, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were associated with a more favorable benefit-harm profile than warfarin. Among NOAC users, dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a more favorable benefit-harm profile than rivaroxaban.
Authors: Antonios Douros; Madeleine Durand; Carla M Doyle; Sarah Yoon; Pauline Reynier; Kristian B Filion Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Sachin J Shah; Daniel E Singer; Margaret C Fang; Kristi Reynolds; Alan S Go; Mark H Eckman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-11-11
Authors: Madeleine Durand; Mireille E Schnitzer; Menglan Pang; Greg Carney; Sherif Eltonsy; Kristian B Filion; Anat Fisher; Min Jun; I Fan Kuo; Christel Renoux; J Michael Paterson; Jacqueline Quail; Alexis Matteau Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-12-18
Authors: Jean-Pierre Bassand; Saverio Virdone; Marc Badoz; Freek W A Verheugt; A John Camm; Frank Cools; Keith A A Fox; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Shinya Goto; Sylvia Haas; Werner Hacke; Gloria Kayani; Frank Misselwitz; Karen S Pieper; Alexander G G Turpie; Martin van Eickels; Ajay K Kakkar Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-02-23
Authors: Xiaoxi Yao; Jonathan W Inselman; Joseph S Ross; Rima Izem; David J Graham; David B Martin; Aliza M Thompson; Mary Ross Southworth; Konstantinos C Siontis; Che G Ngufor; Karl A Nath; Nihar R Desai; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Rajiv Saran; Nilay D Shah; Peter A Noseworthy Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-10-05
Authors: Stine Munk Hald; Sören Möller; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Mike Sharma; Hanne Christensen; Maja Hellfritzsch; Anton Pottegård; Jesper Hallas; David Gaist Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Marie Bradley; Emily C Welch; Efe Eworuke; David J Graham; Rongmei Zhang; Ting-Ying Huang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 5.128