Messoud Ashina1, David Kudrow2, Uwe Reuter3, David Dolezil4, Stephen Silberstein5, Stewart J Tepper6, Fei Xue7, Hernan Picard7, Feng Zhang7, Andrea Wang7, Yanchen Zhou8, Frank Hong9, Jan Klatt9, Daniel D Mikol7. 1. Danish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark. 2. California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Dado Medical sro, Prague Headache Center, Prague, Czech Republic. 5. Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. 7. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. 8. Amgen Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 9. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Efficacy and safety of erenumab have been evaluated in a comprehensive clinical development program resulting in approval for migraine prevention in over 40 countries to date. METHODS: This integrated safety analysis included four double-blind randomized trials and their extensions (up to three-plus years). Safety endpoints included exposure-adjusted patient incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and anti-erenumab antibodies. RESULTS: In all, 2375 of the patients randomized across the four studies received at least one dose of erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg), with cumulative exposure of 2641.2 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates during the double-blind treatment phase were similar to placebo, with the exception of injection-site reactions (17.1 vs. 10.8 per 100 patient-years), constipation (7.0 vs. 3.8 per 100 patient-years), and muscle spasm (2.3 vs. 1.2 per 100 patient-years). During the long-term extensions, adverse events reported were similar to those observed during the double-blind treatment phase, and rates of injection site reactions, constipation, and muscle spasm were reported at lower rates than in the double-blind treatment phase. There were two deaths reported, both confounded by pre-existing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled safety analysis revealed a favorable and stable adverse event profile over time for erenumab with more than three years of exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01952574, NCT02483585, NCT02456740, NCT02066415, and NCT02174861.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of erenumab have been evaluated in a comprehensive clinical development program resulting in approval for migraine prevention in over 40 countries to date. METHODS: This integrated safety analysis included four double-blind randomized trials and their extensions (up to three-plus years). Safety endpoints included exposure-adjusted patient incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and anti-erenumab antibodies. RESULTS: In all, 2375 of the patients randomized across the four studies received at least one dose of erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg), with cumulative exposure of 2641.2 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates during the double-blind treatment phase were similar to placebo, with the exception of injection-site reactions (17.1 vs. 10.8 per 100 patient-years), constipation (7.0 vs. 3.8 per 100 patient-years), and muscle spasm (2.3 vs. 1.2 per 100 patient-years). During the long-term extensions, adverse events reported were similar to those observed during the double-blind treatment phase, and rates of injection site reactions, constipation, and muscle spasm were reported at lower rates than in the double-blind treatment phase. There were two deaths reported, both confounded by pre-existing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled safety analysis revealed a favorable and stable adverse event profile over time for erenumab with more than three years of exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01952574, NCT02483585, NCT02456740, NCT02066415, and NCT02174861.
Authors: Messoud Ashina; Peter J Goadsby; Uwe Reuter; Stephen Silberstein; David W Dodick; Fei Xue; Feng Zhang; Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima; Sunfa Cheng; Daniel D Mikol Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Timothy R Smith; Egilius L H Spierings; Roger Cady; Joe Hirman; Barbara Schaeffler; Vivienne Shen; Bjørn Sperling; Thomas Brevig; Mette Krog Josiassen; Elizabeth Brunner; Loan Honeywell; Lahar Mehta Journal: J Headache Pain Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 7.277
Authors: Robert Belvís; Pablo Irimia; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Carmen González-Oria; Antonio Cano; Javier Viguera; Belén Sánchez; Francisco Molina; Isabel Beltrán; Agustín Oterino; Elisa Cuadrado; Angel Gómez-Camello; Miguel Alberte-Woodward; Carmen Jurado; Teresa Oms; David Ezpeleta; Javier Díaz de Terán; Noemí Morollón; Germán Latorre; Marta Torres-Ferrús; Alicia Alpuente; Raquel Lamas; Carlos Toledano; Rogelio Leira; Sonia Santos; Margarita Sánchez Del Río Journal: J Headache Pain Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 7.277