Literature DB >> 31707159

Long-term impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in low-risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CLOSE to CURE study.

Mattias Duytschaever1, Jan De Pooter2, Anthony Demolder3, Milad El Haddad4, Thomas Phlips4, Teresa Strisciuglio4, Philippe Debonnaire4, Michael Wolf4, Yves Vandekerckhove4, Sebastien Knecht4, Rene Tavernier4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluated the impact of catheter ablation (CA) on atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) burden in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
OBJECTIVE: In the prospective, patient-controlled CLOSE to CURE study, we determined the longer-term impact of optimized CA on ATA burden by using an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM).
METHODS: A total of 105 patients with paroxysmal AF were implanted with an ICM 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 61-78) days before CA. CA consisted of contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation targeting an intertag distance of ≤6 mm and a region-specific ablation index. The primary end point was reduction in ICM-detected ATA burden; secondary end points were single-procedure freedom from ATA, quality of life, and adverse events.
RESULTS: The mean age was 62 ± 8 years; the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1 (IQR 1-2); and the median left atrial diameter was 43 (IQR 39-43) mm. After pulmonary vein isolation (1.13 ± 0.39 procedures per patient), median ATA burden decreased from 2.68% (IQR 0.09%-15.02%) at baseline to 0% (IQR 0%-0%) during the first year and to 0% (IQR 0%-0%) during the second year (reduction in ATA burden 100% [IQR 100%-100%]; P < .001). Single-procedure freedom from any ATA was 87% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. Quality of life improved significantly across all scores. Adverse events occurred in 5 patients (4.8%).
CONCLUSION: CA has become an effective procedure in paroxysmal AF, with a major impact on ICM-detected ATA burden. Whereas conventional survival analysis suggests a progressive decline in efficacy, we observed that burden reduction is maintained at longer follow-up. These data imply that ATA burden is a more optimal end point for assessing ablation efficacy.
Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Burden; Insertable cardiac monitor; Pulmonary vein isolation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31707159     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  11 in total

1.  [Pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation].

Authors:  Leon Iden; Sonia Busch; Daniel Steven; Roland R Tilz; Dong-In Shin; K R Julian Chun; Heidi Estner; Felix Bourier; David Duncker; Philipp Sommer; Andreas Metzner; Tilman Maurer; Nils-Christian Ewertsen; Henning Jansen; Andreas Rillig; Victoria Johnson; Till Althoff
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-26

Review 2.  Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Jitae A Kim; Khurrum Khan; Riyad Kherallah; Shamis Khan; Ishan Kamat; Owais Ulhaq; Qussay Marashly; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: current indications and evolving technologies.

Authors:  Ramanathan Parameswaran; Ahmed M Al-Kaisey; Jonathan M Kalman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Effect on Atrial Fibrillation Burden: The RACE-AF Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Samuel K Sørensen; Arne Johannessen; René Worck; Morten L Hansen; Jim Hansen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  Safety, effectiveness, and quality of life following pulmonary vein isolation with a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes from SHINE.

Authors:  Richard Schilling; Gurpreet Singh Dhillon; Claudio Tondo; Stefania Riva; Massimo Grimaldi; Federico Quadrini; Petr Neuzil; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Ahmed Abdelaal; Liesbeth Vanderlinden; Tiffany Tan; Wern Yew Ding; Dhiraj Gupta; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Optimizing Durability in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Zain I Sharif; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-05-15

7.  Relationship between ablation index and myocardial biomarkers after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alessandro De Bortoli; Anfinsen Ole-Gunnar; Holm Torbjørn
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-11-30

8.  Is Increased Resting Heart Rate after Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Isolation a Predictor of Favorable Long-Term Outcome of the Procedure?

Authors:  Cezary Maciejewski; Michał Peller; Piotr Lodziński; Edward Koźluk; Agnieszka Piątkowska; Dariusz Rodkiewicz; Izabela Sierakowska; Natalia Roman; Diana Wiśniewska; Dominika Żółcińska; Dominika Rymaszewska; Grzegorz Opolski; Marcin Grabowski; Paweł Balsam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation feasibility, safety, durability, and efficacy.

Authors:  René Worck; Samuel K Sørensen; Arne Johannessen; Martin Ruwald; Martin Haugdal; Jim Hansen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Quality of life and healthcare utilisation improvements after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Dhiraj Gupta; Johan Vijgen; Tom De Potter; Daniel Scherr; Hugo Van Herendael; Sebastien Knecht; Richard Kobza; Benjamin Berte; Niels Sandgaard; Jean-Paul Albenque; Gábor Széplaki; Yorick Stevenhagen; Philippe Taghji; Matt Wright; Mattias Duytschaever
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.