Literature DB >> 3170634

Acetylcholine receptors and concanavalin A-binding sites on cultured Xenopus muscle cells: electrophoresis, diffusion, and aggregation.

J Stollberg1, S E Fraser.   

Abstract

Using digitally analyzed fluorescence videomicroscopy, we have examined the behavior of acetylcholine receptors and concanavalin A binding sites in response to externally applied electric fields. The distributions of these molecules on cultured Xenopus myoballs were used to test a simple model which assumes that electrophoresis and diffusion are the only important processes involved. The model describes the distribution of concanavalin A sites quite well over a fourfold range of electric field strengths; the results suggest an average diffusion constant of approximately 2.3 X 10(-9) cm2/s. At higher electric field strengths, the asymmetry seen is substantially less than that predicted by the model. Acetylcholine receptors subjected to electric fields show distributions substantially different from those predicted on the basis of simple electrophoresis and diffusion, and evidence a marked tendency to aggregate. Our results suggest that this aggregation is due to lateral migration of surface acetylcholine receptors, and is dependent on surface interactions, rather than the rearrangement of microfilaments or microtubules. The data are consistent with a diffusion-trap mechanism of receptor aggregation, and suggest that the event triggering receptor localization is a local increase in the concentration of acetylcholine receptors, or the electrophoretic concentration of some other molecular species. These observations suggest that, whatever mechanism(s) trigger initial clustering events in vivo, the accumulation of acetylcholine receptors can be substantially enhanced by passive, diffusion-mediated aggregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3170634      PMCID: PMC2115237          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  40 in total

1.  Polarization of fucoid eggs by steady electrical fields.

Authors:  H B Peng; L F Jaffe
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-10-15       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Developmental regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  S M Schuetze; L W Role
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  A model for the localization of acetylcholine receptors at the muscle endplate.

Authors:  C Edwards; H L Frisch
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1976-07

Review 4.  Rotational and translational diffusion in membranes.

Authors:  M Edidin
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1974

5.  Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in the photoreceptor membrane.

Authors:  M Poo; R A Cone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Electrophoresis along cell membranes.

Authors:  L F Jaffe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Electrophoresis of concanavalin A receptors along embryonic muscle cell membrane.

Authors:  M Poo; K R Robinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes.

Authors:  S J Singer; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The rapid intermixing of cell surface antigens after formation of mouse-human heterokaryons.

Authors:  L D Frye; M Edidin
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Lateral electrophoresis and diffusion of Concanavalin A receptors in the membrane of embryonic muscle cell.

Authors:  M M Poo; W J Poo; J W Lam
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  18 in total

1.  Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Periklis Pantazis; James Maloney; David Wu; Scott E Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  G Ardolino; B Bossi; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Role of membrane potential in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Sarah Sundelacruz; Michael Levin; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Common molecular mechanisms in field- and agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor clustering.

Authors:  F Sabrina; J Stollberg
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.046

5.  Density and diffusion limited aggregation in membranes.

Authors:  J Stollberg
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Subnanosecond polarized fluorescence photobleaching: rotational diffusion of acetylcholine receptors on developing muscle cells.

Authors:  Y Yuan; D Axelrod
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Statistical and fractal analyses of rat prostate cancer cell motility in a direct current electric field: comparison of strongly and weakly metastatic cells.

Authors:  Zuzanna Siwy; Maria E Mycielska; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 1.733

9.  Reversing the direction of galvanotaxis with controlled increases in boundary layer viscosity.

Authors:  Brian M Kobylkevich; Anyesha Sarkar; Brady R Carlberg; Ling Huang; Suman Ranjit; David M Graham; Mark A Messerli
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Mechanism of acetylcholine receptor cluster formation induced by DC electric field.

Authors:  Hailong Luke Zhang; H Benjamin Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.